•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

enterprise；young innovative talents；policy instrument

Abstract

As enterprises strengthen their role of innovation drivers, their participation in cultivating young innovative talent has become a key means to enhance youth innovation, reinforce corporate innovation capacity, and align talent development with industry needs. This study examines the policy instruments and implementation pathways through which enterprises participate in the training of young innovative talent, and conducts a comparative analysis of relevant experiences in the United States, Germany, and Japan. The findings indicate that Germany has developed a collaborative model integrating environmental and supply-side instruments through institutional embedding; the United States has established a demand-led model centered on market-based incentives; and Japan has formed a collaborative model of supply-side and environmental instruments oriented toward strategic symbiosis. Despite their differences in national approaches, all three countries share a common underlying logic of coordinated incentives, empowerment, and embedding, thereby aligning corporate interests with national talent strategies. Building on these insights and China’s specific context, the study proposes policy recommendations including strengthening incentives and demand pull, deepening empowerment and resource decentralization, and promoting systemic embedding and innovation ecosystem development, with the aim of improving China’s mechanisms for cultivating young innovative talent.

First page

1925

Last Page

1935

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

[1] 尹志欣. 前沿科技人才培养发展的国际经验与对策. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2024, 39(Z1): 68-77. Yin Z X. International experience and countermeasures for the cultivation and development of frontier science and technology talents. Global Science, Technology and Economy Outlook, 2024, 39(Z1): 68-77. (in Chinese)

[2] Capano G, Howlett M. The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 2020, 10(1): 1-13.

[3] Coleman S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.

[4] 鲍威, 孙晓哲, 吴嘉琦. 解构产教融合育人中企业深度参与的制约因素——基于AI大语言模型的混合研究. 中国高教研究, 2025, (7): 8-16. Bao W, Sun X Z, Wu J Q. Factors influencing enterprises engagement in industry-university collaboration: An AI large language models mixed-methods study. China Higher Education Research, 2025, (7): 8-16. (in Chinese)

[5] Granstrand O, Holgersson M. Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 2020, 90-91: 102098.

[6] 杨匀, 梁昌裔, 杨金鑫. 供给型政策工具、知识产权保护与企业创新——来自中国制造企业的经验证据. 科技和产业, 2024, 24(13): 49-54. Yang Y, Liang C Y, Yang J X. Supply-oriented policy instruments, intellectual property protection and firm innovation: Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Science Technology and Industry, 2024, 24(13): 49-54. (in Chinese)

[7] 寇明婷, 杜晓明, 张超. 政策与市场工具促进高新技术企业研发活动的组态分析. 科研管理, 2025, 46(2): 97-107. Kou M T, Du X M, Zhang C. Configuration analysis of the promotion of R&D activities of high-tech enterprises by policy and market tools. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 97-107. (in Chinese)

[8] 陈朝月, 吴辉凡. 创新激励政策工具组合何以更有效?——基于企业创新链的视角. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2025, 46(6): 19-31. Chen C Y, Wu H F. How can the innovation incentive policy mix be more effective?—Based on the perspective of enterprise innovation chain. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2025, 46(6): 19-31. (in Chinese)

[9] 冯南平, 赵万荣, 魏芬芬. 创新生态系统组织模式下中小企业参与关键核心技术攻关的行为意愿研究——基于PLS-SEM与fsQCA的混合方法. 科技进步与对策, 2026, 43(5): 92-103. Feng N P, Zhao W R, Wei F F. The willingness of SMEs to participate in key core technology breakthroughs under the organizational model of an innovation ecosystem: An integrated approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2026, 43(5): 92-103. (in Chinese)

[10] 郑烨, 李真淼, 段永彪. 环境政策工具对煤化工企业节能减排绩效的影响——绿色技术创新行为的中介作用和绿色技术创新意愿的调节作用. 干旱区资源与环境, 2025, 39(5): 20-32. Zheng Y, Li Z M, Duan Y B. Impact of environmental policy instruments on energy conservation and emission reduction performance of coal chemical enterprises: Mediating role of green technology innovation behavior and moderating role of green technology innovation willingness. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2025, 39(5): 20-32. (in Chinese)

[11] 程聪, 曹烈冰, 张颖, 等. 中小企业渐进式创新影响因素结构分析——资源基础还是能力制胜?. 科学学研究, 2014, 32(9): 1415-1422. Cheng C, Cao L B, Zhang Y, et al. Analysis of SMEs incremental innovation structural affecting factors: Winning by resource or ability?. Studies in Science of Science, 2014, 32(9): 1415-1422. (in Chinese)

[12] 秦方云, 王凌. 美国联邦政府和社会组织支持青年科研人员的举措和特点. 中国科技人才, 2023, (1): 70-76. Qin F Y, Wang L. The U.S. federal government's and social entities' strategies and practices to support early career investigators. Scientific and Technological Talents of China, 2023, (1): 70-76. (in Chinese)

[13] 西鹏, 陈东阳, 刘爽健. 高校新型研发机构市场化能力建设研究——基于德国弗劳恩霍夫协会模式的思考. 中国高校科技, 2022, (Z1): 92-97. Xi P, Chen D Y, Liu S J. Research on market-oriented capacity construction of university new R&D institutions: Reflections based on the Fraunhofer Association Model in Germany. China University Science & Technology, 2022, (Z1): 92-97. (in Chinese)

[14] 中国电子信息产业发展研究院（赛迪研究院）. 中国集成电路产业人才发展报告（2024—2025年版）. 北京: 中国电子信息产业发展研究院, 2025. China Center for Information Industry Development (CCID). China Integrated Circuit Industry Talent Development Report (2024—2025 Edition). Beijing: China Center for Information Industry Development, 2025.

[15] 陈宝明, 谢昱. 美国能源部国家实验室培养科技人才的做法与经验. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2023, 38(11/12): 79-86. Chen B M, Xie Y. Practice and inspiration of U.S. DOE national laboratories in cultivating science and technology talents. Global Science, Technology and Economy Outlook, 2023, 38(11/12): 79-86. (in Chinese)

[16] 刘进, 钟小琴. 全球人工智能人才培养的政策比较研究：以中美英加四国为例. 重庆高教研究, 2021, 9(2): 39-50. Liu J, Zhong X Q. A comparative study on the policies of global artificial intelligence talent cultivation: Taking China, America, Britain and Canada as examples. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2021, 9(2): 39-50. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS