•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

social contract of science, science policy U.S., science governance

Abstract

This study analyzes the evolution of the relationship between science and government in the United States through the lens of the social contract of science. It proposes a five-dimensional framework covering legitimacy, institutional support, autonomy, functional expectations, and responsibility, and identifies three historical stages from 1945 to 2024, followed by recent policy changes since 2025.The findings suggest a shift from a science-centered, cognition-driven model to a mission-oriented model shaped by national competition and technological capacity. This transition is marked by more concentrated resource allocation, stronger alignment with industrial and security policies, and growing pressure on basic research. Overall, the postwar social contract of science is undergoing a structural transformation that remains unsettled. This shift reflects a context-specific response to intensifying competition rather than a universal model.

First page

1055

Last Page

1066

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1. Bush V. Science, the Endless Frontier. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.

2.Brooks H. National science policy and technological innovation// Landu R, Rosenberg N. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1986: 119-167.

3. Atkinson R D. US science policy at a crossroad. (2025-06-23)[2026-01-24]. https://itif.org/publications/2025/06/23/us-science-policy-at-a-crossroads/.

4. Chiang M. Blazing new trails to the endless frontier: Transforming America’s university research. (2025-04-01)[2026-01-24]. https://www.purdue.edu/president/blazing-new-trails-to-the-endless-frontiers-transformation-of-americas-university-research/.

5. Feuer M. The end of the endless frontier? A warning on research cuts. (2025-07-24)[2026-01-24]. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-end-of-the-endless-frontier-a-warning-on-research-cuts/.

6. Margonelli L. No longer free of strings. Issues in Science and Technology, 2025, 42(1): 17-18.

7. Price D K. Government and Science, Their Dynamic Relation in American Democracy. New York: New York University Press, 1954.

8. Brooks H. Lessons of history: Successive challenges to science policy// Susan E. Cozzens, Peter Healey, Arie Rip, et al. The Research System in Transition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989: 11-22.

9. Guston D H, Kenneth K. Introduction: The social contract for science// Guston D H. and Keniston K. The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1994: 1-41.

10. 大卫·古斯顿. 在政治与科学之间：确保科学研究的诚信与产出率. 龚旭, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011. Guston D H. Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Translated by Gong X. Beijing: Science Press, 2011. (in Chinese)

11. Kleinman D L. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Poswart Research in the United States. Durham: Duke University Press, 1995.

12. Mowery D C，Rosenberg N. The U.S. national innovation system// Nelson R R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993: 29-75.

13. Kevles D. Principles and politics in federal R&D policy, 1945-1990: An appreciation of the Bush Report// Bush V. Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington DC: National Science Foundation, 1990: vii-xxxiii.

14. Clinton W J, Gore A Jr. Science in the National Interests. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1994.

15. Stokes D E. Pasteur’s Quadrant. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.

16. Slaughter S, Rhoades G. From “endless frontier” to “basic science for use”: Social contracts between science and society. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2005, 30(4): 536-572.

17. Government Publishing Office US. GPRA modernization act of 2010. (2011-01-04)[2026-01-07]. https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ352/PLAW-111publ352.pdf.

18. NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. (2010-01-04)[2026-01-07]. https://www.nsf.gov/policies/document/proposal-award-policies-procedures-guide-january-2010/nsf10-1.

19. National Economic Council, Council of Economic Advisers, Office of Science and Technology Policy. A strategy for American innovation: Securing our economic growth and prosperity. (2011-02-02)[2026-01-07]. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/InnovationStrategy.pdf.

20. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Trump administration science & technology highlights. (2026-01-01)[2026-01-07]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/WHOSTP-2025-Wins.pdf.

21. The White House. Restoring gold standard science. (2025-05-23)[2026-01-07]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/restoring-gold-standard-science/.

22. The White House. A letter to Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2025-03-26)[2026-01-07]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/03/a-letter-to-michael-kratsios-director-of-the-white-house-office-of-science-and-technology-policy/.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS