•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

facilitymetrics；team composition；large-scale research infrastructures；internal scientists；scientific impact

Document Type

Policy & Management Research

Abstract

In the context of big science, collaborative research is one of the most significant characteristics and large-scale research infrastructures (LSRIs) play an important role as research platforms. However, whether collaborations, specifically, the co-authorships between facilities’ scientists and users, could affect the performance of LSRIs’ outputs or not is unclear. This work takes SLAC National Accelerate Lab as an example and quantifies how the participation of facilities’ scientists influences the performances of LSRIs’ outputs. The result shows that facilities’ scientists could promote the scientific impact. Therefore, a continued and long-term collaborative relationship should be attempted to set up, which could release the scientific advancing abilities of LSRIs further.

First page

1357

Last Page

1369

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1. 赵兰香, 姚大志, 宋卿清. 建制化科研：概念提出与发展逻辑. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(1): 108-117. Zhao L X, Yao D Z, Song Q Q. Institutionalized science research: The concept and its development logic. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(1): 108-117. (in Chinese) 2. 褚建勋, 王晨阳, 王喆. 国家有组织科研: 迎接世界三大中心转移的中国创新生态系统探讨. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(5): 708-718. Chu J X, Wang C Y, Wang Z. State-organized research(SOR): Chinese innovation eco-system to meet shift of world’s three major centers. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(5): 708-718. (in Chinese) 3. 习近平. 加强基础研究 实现高水平科技自立自强. 求是, 2023, (8): 4-6.Xi J P. Strengthening basic research to realize high-level scientific and technological self-reliance. Qiushi, 2023, (8): 4-6. (in Chinese) 4. 温珂, 蔡长塔, 潘韬, 等. 国立科研机构的建制化演进及发展趋势. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(1): 71-78. Wen K, Cai C T, Pan T, et al. Evolution and trend of public research institutes’ institutionalization. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(1): 71-78. (in Chinese) 5. 龙云安, 胡能贵, 陈国庆, 等. 培育我国国家战略科技力量建制化新优势研究. 科学管理研究, 2017, 35(2): 18-21. Long Y A, Hu N G, Chen G Q, et al. Research on the new advantages of cultivating our country’s national strategic science and technology power. Scientific Management Research, 2017, 35(2): 18-21. (in Chinese) 6. 扈永顺. 依托重大科技基础设施开展建制化研究. 科学大观园, 2023, (15): 60-63. Hu Y S. Relying on major scientific and technological infrastructures to carry out research on institutionalization. Grand Garden of Science, 2023, (15): 60-63. (in Chinese) 7. 李泽霞, 魏韧, 曾钢, 等. 重大科技基础设施领域发展动态与趋势. 世界科技研究与发展, 2019, 41(3): 221-230. Li Z X, Wei R, Zeng G, et al. Analysis on development trends of major research infrastructure. World Sci-Tech R & D, 2019, 41(3): 221-230. (in Chinese) 8. 潘教峰, 鲁晓, 王光辉. 科学研究模式变迁: 有组织的基础研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12): 1395-1403. Pan J F, Lu X, Wang G H. Transforming scientific research: Organized basic research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12): 1395-1403. (in Chinese) 9. Xu F L, Wu L F, Evans J. Flat teams drive scientific innovation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119(23): e2200927119. 10. Wu L F, Wang D S, Evans J A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, 2019, 566: 378-382. 11. Lin Y L, Frey C B, Wu L F. Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. Nature, 2023, 623: 987-991. 12. 张玲玲, 王蝶, 张利斌. 跨学科性与团队合作对大科学装置科学效益的影响研究. 管理世界, 2019, 35(12): 199-212. Zhang L L, Wang D, Zhang L B. Research of the influence of interdisciplinarity and team cooperation on the scientific effects based on large-scale scientific facilities. Management World, 2019, 35(12): 199-212. (in Chinese) 13. Falk-Krzesinski H J, Contractor N, Fiore S M, et al. Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(2): 145-158. 14. Hallonsten O. Introducing ‘facilitymetrics’: A first review and analysis of commonly used measures of scientific leadership among synchrotron radiation facilities worldwide. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(2): 497-513. 15. 李辉, 西桂权, 张惠娜. 美国国家实验室联合攻关重大科技任务的组织模式及启示. 实验技术与管理, 2024, 41(1): 245-251. Li H, Xi G Q, Zhang H N. Organizational model and enlightenment from United States national laboratories in jointly tackling major scientific and technological tasks. Experimental Technology and Management, 2024, 41(1): 245-251. (in Chinese) 16. 黄振羽, 丁云龙. 美国大学与国家实验室关系的演化研究——从一体化到混合的治理结构变迁与启示. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(6): 815-823. Huang Z Y, Ding Y L. Evolutionary analysis of relationship between American universities and national laboratories: From integration to hybrid. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(6): 815-823. (in Chinese) 17. Heinze T, Hallonsten O. The reinvention of the SLAC national accelerator laboratory, 1992–2012. History and Technology, 2017, 33(3): 300-332. 18. Börner K, Silva F N, Milojević S. Visualizing big science projects. Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3(11): 753-761. 19. Lauto G, Valentin F. How large-scale research facilities connect to global research. Review of Policy Research, 2013, 30(4): 381-408. 20. Trimble V. A generation of astronomical telescopes, their users, and publications. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(1): 21-34. 21. Silva F S V, Schulz P A, Noyons E C M. Co-authorship networks and research impact in large research facilities: Benchmarking internal reports and bibliometric databases. Scientometrics, 2019, 118(1): 93-108. 22. D’Ippolito B, Rüling C C. Research collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications. Research Policy, 2019, 48(5): 1282-1296. 23. 刘人境, 钟兴举, 孟拓宁, 等. 大科学装置科研合作网络结构特征研究. 西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2023, 43(6): 140-151. Liu R J, Zhong X J, Meng T N, et al. Structural characteristics of large-scale scientific facility cooperation network. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2023, 43(6): 140-151. (in Chinese) 24. 王婷, 陈凯华, 卢涛, 等. 重大科技基础设施综合效益评估体系构建研究——兼论在FAST评估中的应用. 管理世界, 2020, 36(6): 213-236. Wang T, Chen K H, Lu T, et al. The research on the evaluation system of large research infrastructures’ comprehensive benefits with an application in the evaluation of FAST. Management World, 2020, 36(6): 213-236. (in Chinese) 25. 郭世杰, 王学昭, 韩涛, 等. 大科学装置“预期-实际-扩展应用” 链式模型及其实证研究——以日本SACLA装置为例. 情报学报, 2019, 38(11): 1187-1199. Guo S J, Wang X Z, Han T, et al. The “expected-actual-extended application” chain model, and an empirical study of large scientific facilities, taking SACLA as an example. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(11): 1187-1199. (in Chinese) 26. 段飞, 龙云凤, 孟鸿. 大科学装置推动新材料技术研发的模式和路径——以中国散裂中子源为例. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(17): 103-108. Duan F, Long Y F, Meng H. The model and path of promoting new material technology research and development through large scientific devices: Taking the China spallation neutron source as an example. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(17): 103-108. (in Chinese) 27. 张鑫应. 社会网络视角下中美大科学装置科研合作特征比较研究. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2023. Zhang X Y. A Comparative Study of Research Collaboration Characteristic between China and the United States in Large Research Infrastructures from the Perspective of Social Network: A Case Study of LAMOST and SDSS. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2023. (in Chinese) 28. 李苏蕊, 谢起慧. 大科学装置科普效果的影响路径探究——基于模糊集的定性比较分析. 中国科技论坛, 2023(8): 159-168. Li S R, Xie Q H. Research on the influence path of science popularization effect of large-scale scientific installations—A qualitative comparative analysis based on fuzzy sets. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2023(8): 159-168. (in Chinese) 29. Söderström K R. Global reach, regional strength: Spatial patterns of a big science facility. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023, 74(9): 1140-1156. 30. Heidler R, Hallonsten O. Qualifying the performance evaluation of Big Science beyond productivity, impact and costs. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(1): 295-312. 31. Söderström K R. The structure and dynamics of instrument collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(6): 3581-3600. 32. 陈娟, 周华杰, 樊潇潇, 等. 美国能源部大科学装置建设管理与启示. 前沿科学, 2016, 10(2): 63-70. Chen J, Zhou H J, Fan X X, et al. The organization structure and management methods of large scientific facilities in the US department of energy. Frontier Science, 2016, 10(2): 63-70. (in Chinese) 33. Lin Z H, Yin Y A, Liu L, et al. SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science research. Scientific Data, 2023, 10: 315. 34. Xu H M, Liu M J, Bu Y, et al. The impact of heterogeneous shared leadership in scientific teams. Information Processing & Management, 2024, 61(1): 103542. 35. Nakajima K, Liu R D, Shudo K, et al. Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice. Journal of Informetrics, 2023, 17(4): 101460. 36. Brzezinski M. Power laws in citation distributions: Evidence from Scopus. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(1): 213-228. 37. Zhu X D, Turney P, Lemire D, et al. Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(2): 408-427. 38. Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science, 2016, 63(3): 791-817. 39. Lyu D Q, Gong K L, Ruan X M, et al. Does research collaboration influence the “disruption” of articles? Evidence from neurosciences. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(1): 287-303. 40. Thelwall M, Kousha K, Abdoli M, et al. Why are coauthored academic articles more cited: Higher quality or larger audience?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023, 74(7): 791-810. 41. Bornmann L. Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents-such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 170-184. 42. Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(3): 419-429. 43. Liu X, Bu Y, Li M, et al. Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2024, 75(1): 59-78. 44. Tahamtan I, Safipour Afshar A, Ahamdzadeh K. Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3): 1195-1225. 45. Hinnant C C, Stvilia B, Wu S H, et al. Author-team diversity and the impact of scientific publications: Evidence from physics research at a national science lab. Library & Information Science Research, 2012, 34(4): 249-257.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS