Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
Keywords
“lucid; waters;and;lush;mountainsareinvaluableassets”, ecological assets, ecological value, ecological GDP, Yellow River Basin
Document Type
Review and Outlook on Concept "Lucid Waters and Lush Mountains Are Invaluable Assets" at Its 20th Anniversary: Scientific Connotation, Strategic Value, and Case Study-Scientific Connotation
Abstract
This study, following Xi Jinping’s ecological civilization philosophy and the two mountains concept, explores pathways for realizing ecological value and mechanisms for ecological GDP in the Yellow River Basin. The research demonstrates that the two mountains concept breaks through the limitations of traditional development paradigms, providing a foundational guide for ecological conservation and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. The research shows that constructing an ecological asset system and incorporating it into GDP accounting is the key to addressing the challenges of ecological value transformation. This requires adherence to the principles of “requisition-compensation balance” and “market-based transaction”, coupled with the quantification and rights verification of core ecological assets to facilitate the conversion of ecological resources into ecological products. The estimates reveal that over 90% of the total ecological asset value in the Yellow River Basin originates from its upper and middle reaches provinces, highlighting the necessity for cross-regional compensation mechanisms to address spatial imbalances. Three pathways for ecological value realization are proposed based on regional characteristics: (1) “storage-based transformation” is applicable to ecologically rich regions such as Qinghai; (2) “investment-driven” path for regions with diversified industries such as Shandong and Sichuan; (3) “storage-investment composite” model for resource-dependent regions with industrial structure transformation needs such as Shanxi and Inner Mongolia.
First page
1143
Last Page
1156
Language
Chinese
Publisher
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
References
1 张金良, 李达. 黄河流域泥沙系统治理科学研究与工程实践. 中国水利, 2024, (5): 11-16+23. Zhang J L, Li D. Scientific research and engineering practice in the systematic governance of sediment in the Yellow River Basin. China Water Resources, 2024, (5): 11-16+23. (in Chinese)
2 刘玉龙, 阮本清, 张春玲, 等. 从生态补偿到流域生态共建共享——兼以新安江流域为例的机制探讨. 中国水利, 2006, (10): 4-8. Liu Y L, Ruan B Q, Zhang C L, et al. From ecological compensation to ecological inter-construction and share of river basins: a mechanism discussion on the Xin’an River Basin. China Water Resources, 2006, (10): 4-8. (in Chinese)
3 陈其煜, 罗可欣, 黄光晴. 林业生态产品价值实现机制研究——以三明市“林改”为例. 造纸装备及材料, 2023, 52(2): 186-188. Chen Q Y, Luo K X, Huang G Q. Research on the value realization mechanism of forestry ecological products: A case study of “Forest Reform” in Sanming City. Papermaking equipment and materials, 2023, 52(2): 186-188. (in Chinese)
4 张二进. 回顾与展望:我国生态产品价值实现研究综述. 中国国土资源经济, 2023, 36(4): 51-58+81. Zhang E J. Retrospect and prospect: summary of research on the value realization of eco-products in China. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2023, 36(4): 51-58+81. (in Chinese)
5 孙阁. 塞罕坝林场造林碳汇达成首笔交易. 国土绿化, 2018, (8): 55. Sun G. Saihanba Forest Farm afforestation carbon sink reached the first transaction. Land Greening, 2018, (8): 55. (in Chinese)
6 邱凉, 郑艳霞, 翟红娟, 等. 赤水河流域生态补偿机制研究. 人民长江, 2013, 44(13): 94-96+108. Qiu L, Zheng Y X, Zhai H J, et al. Research on ecological compensation mechanism of Chishui River Basin. Yangtze River, 2013, 44(13): 94-96+108. (in Chinese)
Recommended Citation
WANG, Guangqian
(2024)
"“Lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets”: Pathways and prospects for ecological GDP in the Yellow River Basin,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 40
:
Iss.
7
, Article 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/j.issn.1000-3045.20250512004
Available at:
https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol40/iss7/2
Included in
Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons, Sustainability Commons