•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

ecosystem product；realizing the value；value monetization；ecosystem services；regulation services；Beijing

Document Type

Review and Outlook on Concept "Lucid Waters and Lush Mountains Are Invaluable Assets" at Its 20th Anniversary: Scientific Connotation, Strategic Value, and Case Study-Case Study

Abstract

The regulating services provided by ecosystems are an important safeguard for regional ecological security, and are typical public service products characterized by non-excludability and non-rivalry. Compared with the material provisioning products and cultural service products of ecosystems, regulating services face significant shortcomings in market-based value realization and monetization capacity, making them difficult to trade and monetize. This study systematically introduces the experiences of Beijing and particularly Yanqing District and Mentougou District in overcoming bottlenecks and promoting the monetization and enhancement of regulating service products. In the area of value realization, major efforts have focused on policy preparation and the cultivation of policy-driven markets; in the area of value enhancement, work has mainly centered on expanding coverage, increasing quality, enhancing protection, optimizing land-use, and so on. In addition, to enhance the application and management efficiency of the value of regulating services, an integrated cloud platform for regulation services management has been adopted.

First page

1295

Last Page

1305

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 国家发展和改革委员会, 国家统计局. 生态产品总值核算规范. 北京: 人民出版社, 2022. National Development and Reform Commission, National Bureau of Statistics. Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting specification. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2022. (in Chinese)

2 潘家华. 生态产品的属性及其价值溯源. 环境与可持续发展, 2020, 45(6): 72-74. Pan J H. On the attributes of ecological products and their value traceability. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2020, 45(6): 72-74. (in Chinese)

3 Ouyang Z Y, Song C S, Zheng H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. PNAS, 2020, 117(25): 14593-14601.

4 Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B, et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 117-125.

5 Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Norström A, et al. Integrating supply and demand in ecosystem service bundles characterization across Mediterranean transformed landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34(7): 1619-1633.

6 束承继, 孟菡, 韩宝龙, 等. 降雨因素对生态系统生产总值核算结果的影响. 生态学报, 2023, 43(3): 1054-1063. Shu C J, Meng H, Han B L, et al. Impact of precipitation factors on Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting results. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(3): 1054-1063. (in Chinese)

7 Neuenkamp L, García de León D, Hamer U, et al. Comprehensive tools for ecological restoration of soils foster sustainable use and resilience of agricultural land. Communications Biology, 2024, 7: 1577.

8 Escobedo F J, Wagner J E, Nowak D J, et al. Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile’s policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 86(1): 148-157.

9 Tu Z S, Chen Z L, Ye H D, et al. Integrating water quality restoration cost with ecosystem service flow to quantify an ecological compensation standard: A case study of the Taoxi Creek Watershed. Water, 2022, 14(9): 1459.

10 Guo C Y, Han B L, Shu C J, et al. Research on CLUFS and its application in rapid prediction of the impact of regulating services value in construction projects. Land, 2023, 12(11): 2041.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS