•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

psychology; neuroscience; integration of disciplines; challenges; roles

Document Type

Disciplinary Development

Abstract

Psychology and neuroscience are deeply cross-fertilized to reveal the neural mechanisms of psychological processes and to promote the precise diagnosis and treatment of mental diseases. Psychology and neuroscience need to further break down disciplinary boundaries in the future to jointly address the complex challenges of human mental and brain health. This study discusses the role of psychology in the interaction with neuroscience, analyzes the challenges facing the interaction between the two parties as well as the direction of future breakthroughs, and uses a community-based population-based cohort study of depression as an example to further illustrate the multiple challenges of such interactions in practice as well as the central role that psychology can play in addressing the challenges.

First page

1082

Last Page

1088

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 刘勋, 伍海燕. 心理学与脑科学：进展、思考和展望. 科技导报, 2017, 35(19): 12-13. Liu X, Wu H Y. Psychology and brain science: Advances, reflections, and perspectives. Science & Technology Review, 2017, 35(19): 12-13. (in Chinese)

2 McKeon S D, Perica M I, Calabro F J, et al. Prefrontal excitation/inhibition balance supports adolescent enhancements in circuit signal to noise ratio. Progress in Neurobiology, 2024, 243: 102695.

3 MacDonald A W, Cohen J D, Stenger V A, et al. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control.Science, 2000, 288: 1835-1838.

4 Hofmann S G, Ellard K K, Siegle G J. Neurobiological correlates of cognitions in fear and anxiety: A cognitive-neurobiological information-processing model. Cognition and Emotion, 2012, 26(2): 282-299.

5 Hölzel B K, Carmody J, Vangel M, et al. Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 2011, 191(1): 36-43.

6 Luber B, Lisanby S H. Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuro Image, 2014, 85(3): 961-970.

7 Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Moran J M, Nieto-Castañón A, et al. Associations and dissociations between default and self-reference networks in the human brain. NeuroImage, 2011, 55(1): 225-232.

8 Salamone J D, Correa M. The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron, 2012, 76(3): 470-485.

9 Norman W T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66: 574-583.

10 Depue R A, Luciana M, Arbisi P, et al. Dopamine and the structure of personality: Relation of agonist-induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67(3): 485-498.

11 Teicher M H, Samson J A, Anderson C M, et al. The effects of childhood maltreatment on brain structure, function and connectivity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2016, 17(10): 652-666.

12 Wang Y, Zheng D, Chen J, et al. Born for fairness: Evidence of genetic contribution to a neural basis of fairness intuition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2019, 14(5): 539-548.

13 Cui Y, Liu B, Zhou Y, et al. Genetic effects on fine-grained human cortical regionalization. Cerebral Cortex, 2016, 26(9): 3732-3743.

14 Zhou Y, Wang Y, Rao L L, et al. Money talks: Neural substrate of modulation of fairness by monetary incentives. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2014, 8: 150.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS