•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

industrial system; basic research; applied technology; talent cultivation; institutional reform

Document Type

Deep Integration Development of Technological and Industrial Innovation

Abstract

The core of the competition between large nations during the fourth industrial revolution is centered on economic resilience, which is based on the industrial system of each nation. The key takeaway from the historical experience of industrial development in the United Kingdom and the United States is that the building of a modern industrial system must prioritize the balanced development of industries rather than concentrating solely on the financial and service sectors and ignoring the manufacturing sector, which leads to industrial hollowing-out. China ought to build a modern industrial system that possesses the five characteristics, including industry comprehensiveness, large capacity, a wide variety of economic activities, high density of economic activity, and advanced technology. The essence of building a modern industrial system is to cultivate new industries while upgrading traditional industries, both of which rely on the generation of innovative technologies. The current institutional shortcomings that hinder the realization of technological innovation in China include structural fragmentation of the talent cultivation system, bias in the definition of talent, improper design of research projects and review systems, disconnection between basic research and applied technology, lack of scientific understanding of enterprises-universities-researches integration, and over-regulation of emerging industries. To overcome these drawbacks, China should promote the establishment of a large and integrated science and technology innovation system, using a “multi-tracking” model, which consists of technology demand-led innovation, a traditional innovation mode with basic research conducted by universities and research institutions, and leveraging artificial intelligence for technology innovation. In the meantime, China should establish special science and technology innovation zones in specific geographic and functional areas and implement pilot reforms of institutional mechanisms in these zones.

First page

795

Last Page

808

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 Kochhar R. The State of the American Middle Class: Who is in it and key trends from 1970 to 2023. (2024-05-31)[2025-04-09]. https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2024/05/31/the-state-of-the-american-middle-class/.

2 郑永年, 徐兰朦. 企业如何通过开放实现技术进步. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(11): 1675-1684. Zheng Y N, Xu L M. How enterprises achieve technological progress through openness?. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(11): 1675-1684. (in Chinese)

3 郑永年. 中国跨越“中等技术陷阱”的策略研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(11): 1579-1592. Zheng Y N. How can China avoid the middle technology trap?. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(11): 1579-1592. (in Chinese)

4 陈瑞飞, 史冬梅. 国外科技计划支持青年科技人才的主要做法及启示. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2022, 37(11): 51-61. Chen R F, Shi D M. The main practice and enlightenment of foreign science and technology plans supporting young scientific and technological talents. Global Science, Technology and Economy Outlook, 2022, 37(11): 51-61. (in Chinese)

5 Liu B, Slusarczyk M. Fueling global pharma pipelines: The rise of China’s innovations. (2025-02-06)[2025-04-10]. https://www.simon-kucher.com/en/insights/fueling-global-pharma-pipelines-rise-chinas-innovations.

6 任晓星, 史录文. 中美欧新药上市加快审评审批政策研究.中国新药杂志, 2020, 29(9): 961-971. Ren X X, Shi L W. A policy study on NDA/BLA expedited pathways in China, US and EU. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2020, 29(9): 961-971.. (in Chinese)

7 Smith-Goodson P, Kimball M. The Stargate Project: Trump Touts $500 Billion Bid for AI Dominance. (2025-01-30)[2025-04-11]. https://www.forbes.com/sites/moorinsights/2025/01/30/the-stargate-project-trump-touts-500-billion-bid-for-ai-dominance/.

8 Nelson R R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 1959, 67(3): 297-306.

Share

COinS