•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

national research institution; critical and core technologies; management and mechanism

Document Type

Understanding and Countermeasures for National Critical Technology Strategy

Abstract

As an important component of the national strategic scientific and technological forces, national research institutions, especially those in high-tech fields, have important missions and responsibilities in developing critical and core technologies. This study firstly analyzes the mission and function of national research institutions in critical and core technology research, and then illustrates that national research institutions are capable of undertaking critical and core technologies that need large and long cycle of investments and are of high risk, which means universities and enterprises could not or have no willingness to carry out. In details, national research institutions are able to conduct R&D of three types of critical and core technologies: basic frontier driven technology (Type I), generic industrial technology (Type II), and niche technology (Type III). National research institutions have formed relatively mature management mechanisms in R&D of Type I critical and core technologies, but has not yet formed clear management mechanisms in Type II and Type III critical and core technologies. Therefore, this study focuses on the four major elements including topic selection, fund allocation, forces organization, and personal incentive, to investigate the international experiences and inspiration to China. It provides research support for China’s national research institutions to better fulfill the mission of high level scientific and technological self-reliance.

First page

935

Last Page

945

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 樊春良, 李哲. 国家科研机构在国家战略科技力量中的定位和作用. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5): 642-651. Fan C L, Li Z. Orientation and role of national scientific research institutions in national strategic scientific and technological strength. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5): 642-651. (in Chinese)

2 魏鹏, 田德录, 李静, 等. 使命导向国家科研机构治理变革——源起、困境与路径. 科学学研究, 2024, doi: 10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20241031.002. Wei P, Tian D L, Li J, et al. Mission-oriented governance reform of national research institutions: Origin, dilemma and approach. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, doi: 10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20241031.002. (in Chinese)

3 白光祖, 万劲波, 彭现科, 等. 强化国家战略科技力量支撑，服务构建新发展格局. 科技导报, 2022, 40(11): 6-14. Bai G Z, Wan J B, Peng X K, et al. Strengthening national strategic scientific and technological power for supporting the creation of new development paradigm. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(11): 6-14. (in Chinese)

4 刘震, 崔曦元. 高校在国家关键核心技术突破中的有组织科研机制研究——以清华大学核研院高温气冷堆技术攻关为例. 清华大学教育研究, 2023, 44(2): 21-29. Liu Z, Cui X Y. Study of the mechanism of organized scientific research in colleges and universities in the breakthrough in core technologies in key fields—A case study of the high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR)in Tsinghua University. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 2023, 44(2): 21-29. (in Chinese)

5 余江, 管开轩, 李哲, 等. 聚焦关键核心技术攻关强化国家科技创新体系化能力. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(8): 1018-1023. Yu J, Guan K X, Li Z, et al. Focus on key technology breakthroughs, and strengthen national scientific and technological innovation systematization capability. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(8): 1018-1023. (in Chinese)

6 胡登峰, 黄紫微, 李博, 等. 关键核心技术突破助推链长职能的培育机制研究——以中国建材补链强链为例. 管理世界, 2024, 40(6): 169-195. Hu D F, Huang Z W, Li B, et al. Research on the cultivation mechanism of key core technology breakthroughs to promote chain leader’s functions in the industrial chain: A case study of CNBM’s complementing the chain with technology and integrating to strengthen the chain. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(6): 169-195. (in Chinese)

7 樊春良. 科技举国体制的历史演变与未来发展趋势. 国家治理, 2020, (42): 23-28. Fan C L. The historical evolution and future development trend of science and technology nationwide system. Governance, 2020, (42): 23-28. (in Chinese)

8 余江, 陈凤, 张越, 等. 铸造强国重器：关键核心技术突破的规律探索与体系构建. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(3): 339-343. Yu J, Chen F, Zhang Y, et al. Forging pillars of scientific and technological power: Mechanism exploration and system construction for breakthrough of core and key technologies. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(3): 339-343. (in Chinese)

9 白春礼. 世界主要国立科研机构概况. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. Bai C L. A Profile of the World’s Major National Scientific Research Institutions. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. (in Chinese)

10 张玉臣, 谭礼. 关键核心技术的概念界定a、特征辨析及突破路径. 中国科技论坛, 2023, (2): 20-29. Zhang Y C, Tan L. Concept definition, characteristic discrimination and breakthrough path of key core technology. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2023, (2): 20-29. (in Chinese)

11 辜胜阻, 吴华君, 吴沁沁, 等. 创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石. 中国软科学, 2018, (10): 9-18. Gu S Z, Wu H J, Wu Q Q, et al. Innovation-driven and core technology breakthrough: The cornerstone of high-quality development. China Soft Science, 2018, (10): 9-18. (in Chinese)

12 高乔子. 中国企业的核心技术短板分析及对策研究. 学习论坛, 2018, (3): 54-58. Gao Q Z. Analysis and countermeasure research on the core technology shortboard of Chinese enterprises. Tribune of Study, 2018, (3): 54-58. (in Chinese)

13 阳镇. 关键核心技术：多层次理解及其突破. 创新科技, 2023, 23(1): 14-24. Yang Z. Core technologies in key fields: Multi-level understanding and breakthrough. Innovation Science and Technology, 2023, 23(1): 14-24. (in Chinese)

14 肖小溪, 李晓轩. 关于国家战略科技力量概念及特征的研究. 中国科技论坛, 2021, (3): 1-7. Xiao X X, Li X X. Study on concept and characteristics of national strategic science and technology forces. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2021, (3): 1-7. (in Chinese)

15 Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter, 1987.

16 吴月辉. 积极探索新型科研组织模式. 人民日报, 2024-02-26(19). Wu Y H. Actively explore a new model of scientific research organization. People’s Daily, 2024-02-26(19). (in Chinese)

17 张锁江. 推进建制化科研范式变革. 科技日报, 2022-11-25(05). Zhang S J. Promoting the paradigm change of institutional scientific research. Science and Technology Daily, 2022-11-25(05). (in Chinese)

18 王彤, 梁洪力. 建制化科研：现实内涵与优势发挥——以中国科学院实践为例. 科技促进发展, 2024, 20(2): 179-184. Wang T, Liang H L. Institutional scientific research: Realistic connotation and advantage play —Take the Chinese Academy of Sciences as example. Science & Technology for Development, 2024, 20(2): 179-184. (in Chinese)

19 彭晓艺, 周程, 张赤东. 关键核心技术攻关的国家支持模式——以韩国半导体4M DRAM联合研发项目为例. 中国科技论坛, 2024, (5): 178-188. Peng X Y, Zhou C, Zhang C D. Study on the state support model of key core technology research and development—Taking Korean semiconductor 4M DRAM joint R&D project as an example. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2024, (5): 178-188. (in Chinese)

20 陈凤, 余江, 甘泉, 等. 国立科研机构如何牵引核心技术攻坚体系：国际经验与启示. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(8): 920-925. Chen F, Yu J, Gan Q, et al. How national research institutes pilot system for core technology breakthrough: International experience and implications. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(8): 920-925. (in Chinese)

21 黄宁燕, 张丽娟. 美国联邦机构技术转移管理和运行机制研究. 中国科技论坛, 2024, (8): 169-178. Huang N Y, Zhang L J. Research on the management and operation mechanism of technology transfer of federal institutions in the United States. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2024, (8): 169-178. (in Chinese)

22 李晓轩, 黄鹏. 美国国立科研机构薪酬体制与启示. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007, (S1): 123-127. Li X X, Huang P. The salary system of national scientific research institutions in the United States and its enlightenment. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2007, (S1): 123-127. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS