Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
Keywords
scientific progress;national security;major country competition;community of a shared future for mankind;scientific diplomacy
Document Type
Strategy & Policy Decision Research
Abstract
Due to the new round of sci-tech revolution and industrial transformation, the relation between scientific progress and national security has been upgraded to an unprecedented strategic height. Therefore, it is vitally important to explore the current situation and future trajectory of the relation between the two. This study discusses the new trends between global scientific progress and the security of sovereign countries. It believes that scientific progress has catalyzed the new geopolitical contests, development contradiction and hegemonic tools in global security governance, thereby enlightening China’s approach to national security. To maintain holistic national security, China should formulate an overall strategic program to coordinate scientific progress and national security and also fortify a sound protection system. Moreover, to promote global common security, China should explore a scientific practice route, demonstrate China’s insight and responsibility, and endeavor to build a community of a shared future for mankind with universal security in the global scientific trend.
First page
483
Last Page
493
Language
Chinese
Publisher
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
References
1 阎德学. 国际失序与全球安全治理. 亚太安全与海洋研究, 2023, (6): 33-49.Yan D X. International disorder and global security governance. Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Affairs, 2023, (6): 33-49. (in Chinese)
2 王一鸣. 百年大变局、高质量发展与构建新发展格局. 管理世界, 2020, 36(12): 1-13.Wang Y M. Great changes in a century, high-quality development and the construction of a new development pattern. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(12): 1-13. (in Chinese)
3 于淼, 田开元. 2023年国际形势发展特征. 人民论坛, 2023, (24): 8-11.Yu M, Tian K Y. Characteristics of international situation development in 2023. People’s Tribune, 2023, (24): 8-11. (in Chinese)
4 张高原. 大国战略竞争时代全球数字治理新态势及中国的应对方案. 领导科学, 2023, (1): 21-25.Zhang G Y. New trends in global digital governance in the era of major power strategic competition and China’s countermeasures. Leadership Science, 2023, (1): 21-25. (in Chinese)
5 Bunde T, Eisentraut S, Schütte L. Munich Security Report 2024: Lose-Lose? (2024-02-16)[2024-4-16]. https://securityconference.org/assets/01_Bilder_Inhalte/03_Medien/02_Publikationen/2024/MSR_2024/MunichSecurityReport2024_Lose-lose.pdf.
6 许蔓舒, 桂畅旎, 刘杨钺, 等. 数字空间的大国博弈笔谈. 信息安全与通信保密, 2021, (12): 2-16.Xu M S, Gui C N, Liu Y Y, et al. Great powers’ game in digital space: A panel discussion. Information Security and Communications Privacy, 2021, (12): 2-16. (in Chinese)
7 高尚涛. 国际关系理论基础. 北京: 时事出版社, 2009.Gao S T. An Introduction to International Relations Theory. Beijing: Current Affairs Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
8 苗争鸣, 陈嘉澍, 聂正楠, 等. 人工智能、数字权力与大国博弈. 信息安全与通信保密, 2023, 21(8): 2-9.Miao Z M, Chen J S, Nie Z N, et al. Artificialintelligence, digital power and great powers competition. Information Security and Communications Privacy, 2023, 21(8): 2-9. (in Chinese)
9 石纯民. 数字化时代,亟须捍卫“数据主权”. 中国国防报, 2018-03-01(03).Shi C M. In the digital age, it is urgent to defend “data sovereignty”. Zhongguo Guofangbao, 2018-03-01(03). (in Chinese)
10 Bradford A. Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2023:13.
11 姚璐, 何佳丽. 全球数字治理在国家安全中的多重作用. 现代国际关系, 2021, (9): 28-35.Yao L, He J L. Multiple impacts of global digital governance in national security. Contemporary International Relations, 2021, (9): 28-35. (in Chinese)
12 王栋, 高丹. 数字全球化与中美战略竞争. 当代美国评论, 2022, 6(2): 25-43.Wang D, Gao D. Digital globalization and China-US strategic competition. Contemporary American Review, 2022, 6(2): 25-43. (in Chinese)
13 Broeders D, Cristiano F, Kaminska M. In search of digital sovereignty and strategic autonomy: Normative power Europe to the test of its geopolitical ambitions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2023, 61(5): 1261-1280.
14 姜志达. 欧盟构建“数字主权”的逻辑与中欧数字合作. 国际论坛, 2021, 23(4): 64-80.Jiang Z D. The logic for EU’s pursuit for digital sovereignty and China-EU digital cooperation. International Forum, 2021, 23(4): 64-80. (in Chinese)
15 李峥. 全球新一轮技术民族主义及其影响. 现代国际关系, 2021, 31(3): 31-39.Li Z. A new round of global technological nationalism and its impacts. Contemporary International Relations, 2021, 31(3): 31-39. (in Chinese)
16 曹峻, 杨慧, 杨丽娟. 全球化与中国国家安全. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2008.Cao J, Yang H, Yang L J. Globalization and National Security in China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academy Press (China), 2008. (in Chinese)
17 冯昭奎. 科技全球化的潮流与逆流——兼论中国应对科技全球化的历程与对策. 国际展望, 2019, 11(3): 55-77.Feng Z K. Globalization of science and technology: China’s choice and response. Global Review, 2019, 11(3): 55-77. (in Chinese)
18 Skare M, Soriano D. How globalization is changing digital technology adoption: An international perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2021, 6(4): 222-233.
19 中国信息通信研究院. 全球数字经济白皮书(2023年). (2024-01-09)[2024-02-03]. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202401/P020240109492552259509.pdf.China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. White paper on global digital economy (2023). (2024-01-09)[2024-02-03]. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202401/P020240109492552259509.pdf. (in Chinese)
20 张耀军, 宋佳芸. 数字“一带一路”的挑战与应对. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 34(5): 38-43.Zhang Y J, Song J Y. Digital Belt and Road Initiative: Challenges and countermeasures. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 2017, 34(5): 38-43. (in Chinese)
21 蔡翠红. 全球科技发展:迭代加速与地缘政治化. 人民论坛, 2023, (24): 24-29.Cai C H. Global science and technology development: Iterative acceleration and geo-politicalization. People’s Tribune, 2023, (24): 24-29. (in Chinese)
22 刘杨钺, 杨一心. 网络空间“再主权化”与国际网络治理的未来. 国际论坛, 2013, 15(6): 1-7.Liu Y Y, Yang Y X. The resurgence of sovereignty in cyberspace and its implications for internet governance. International Forum, 2013, 15(6): 1-7. (in Chinese)
23 Bremmer I. The technopolar moment: How digital powers will reshape the global order. Foreign Affairs, 2021, 100(6): 112-128.
24 刘典. 科技巨头重塑地缘格局:审视俄乌冲突中的数字权力竞争. 东方学刊, 2022, (2): 30-38.Liu D. Tech giants reshaping geopolitical landscape: Examining the digital power competition in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Dongfang Journal, 2022, (2): 30-38. (in Chinese)
25 周武英. 美欧继续加大科技反垄断力度. 经济参考报, 2024-03-26(08).Zhou W Y. The US and Europe continue to increase anti-monopoly efforts in technology. Economic Information Daily, 2024-03-26(08). (in Chinese)
26 张颖. 守望相助:习近平安全理念的理论创新与实践路径. 国际安全研究, 2021, 39(3): 3-24.Zhang Y. “Standing together with mutual assistance amid difficulties”: Theoretical innovation and practical path of Xi Jinping’s security concept. Journal of International Security Studies, 2021, 39(3): 3-24. (in Chinese)
27 巴瑞·布赞, 奥利·维夫, 迪·怀尔德. 新安全论. 朱宁, 译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2003.Buzan B, Weaver O, Wilde D J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Translated by Zhu N. Hangzhou: Zhejiang People’s Publishing House, 2003. (in Chinese)
28 Gavin F J. Economics and U.S. national security. War on the Rocks. (2021-06-29)[2024-04-29]. https://warontherocks.com/2021/06/economics-and-u-s-national-security/.
29 廖小平. 人类命运共同体与共同价值安全构建. 求索, 2020, (4): 29-36.Liao X P. The community of shared future for mankind and the construction of common value security. Seeker, 2020, (4): 29-36. (in Chinese)
30 张超, 吴白乙. “泛安全化陷阱”及其跨越. 国际展望, 2022, 14(2): 19-35.Zhang C, Wu B Y. On overcoming the “OversecuritizationTrap”. Global Review, 2022, 14(2): 19-35. (in Chinese)
31 毛维准, 王钦林. 大变局下的中美人文交流安全化逻辑. 国际展望, 2021, 13(6): 34-55.Mao W Z, Wang Q L. Study on securitization of people-to-people exchange between China and U.S. in momentous changes. Global Review, 2021, 13(6): 34-55. (in Chinese)
32 岳圣淞. 再论安全化:理论困境与对外政策话语分析的新探索. 国际关系研究, 2021, (3): 3-27.Yue S S. Revisiting securitization: theoretical dilemma and new exploration in foreign policy discourse analysis. Journal of International Relations, 2021, (3): 3-27. (in Chinese)
33 Allen C G. China is striking back in the tech war with the U.S. (2023-07-20)[2024-01-31]. https://time.com/6295902/china-tech-war-u-s/.
34 李峥. 美国“科技软实力”武器化潜藏风险. (2022-03-30)[2022-07-03]. https://opinion.huanqiu.com/article/47OgcaeP7Av.Li Z. Weaponization of U.S. “Soft Power of Science and Technology” carries risks. (2022-03-30)[2022-07-03]. https://opinion.huanqiu.com/article/47OgcaeP7Av.(in Chinese)
35 郭才华, 张国清. 全球安全危机与构建人类安全共同体. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(3): 48-60.Guo C H, Zhang G Q. Global security crisis and building a security community for mankind. Journal of Zhejiang University Humanities and Social Sciences), 2021, 51(3): 48-60. (in Chinese)
36 余南平, 张翌然. 国际关系演变的技术政治解释——以美国对华技术博弈为分析视角. 世界经济与政治论坛, 2024, (1): 3-20.Yu N P, Zhang Y R. Technopolitical interpretation of the evolution of international relations: An analytical perspective of United States’ technology game against China. Forum of World Economics & Politics, 2024, (1): 3-20. (in Chinese)
37 李舒. 科技竞争对国家战略布局的影响与应对. 探索与争鸣, 2022, (1): 32-35.Li S. Impact and response of national strategic layout in competition of science and technology. Exploration and Free Views, 2022, (1): 32-35. (in Chinese)
38 《总体国家安全观干部读本》编委会. 总体国家安全观干部读本. 北京: 人民出版社, 2016.Editorial Committee of the Cadre Readings on the Holistic Approach to National Security. Cadre Readings on the Holistic Approach to National Security. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2016. (in Chinese)
39 和音. 为应对人类安全挑战贡献中国方案. 人民日报, 2022-04-22(02).He Y. Contribute China’s ideals to respond to the human security challenges. People’s Daily, 2022-04-22(02). (in Chinese)
40 本报评论员. 中国经济大船将乘风破浪持续前行. 人民日报, 2023-10-27(01).Commentator. The giant ship of the Chinese economy will continue to cleave waves and sail ahead. People’s Daily, 2023-10-27(01). (in Chinese)
41 任春光, 杨小明. 推进国际科技创新交流(新知新觉). (2024-01-24)[2024-01-31]. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2024-01/24/nw.D110000renmrb_20240124_3-09.htm.Ren C G, Yang X M. Promote international exchange on scientific and technological innovation (Xin Zhi Xin Jue). (2024-01-24)[2024-01-31]. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2024-01/24/nw.D110000renmrb_20240124_3-09.htm.(in Chinese)
42 方兴东, 钟祥铭, 谢永琪.“布鲁塞尔效应”与中国数字治理的制度创新——中美欧竞合博弈的建构主义解读. 传媒观察, 2024, (3): 33-44.Fang X D, Zhong X M, Xie Y Q. The “Brussels effect” and institutional innovation of digital governance in China. Media Observer, 2024, (3): 33-44. (in Chinese)
43 郭锐, 廖仁郎. 国家安全观的时代嬗变与可持续安全. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2019, 48(6): 9-17.Guo R, Liao R L. Evolution of the concept of national security and sustainable security. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University, 2019, 48(6): 9-17. (in Chinese)
Recommended Citation
LIANG, Haoguang; WU, Linman; LIU, Zhujun; and ZHANG, Yaojun
(2024)
"On global security governance’s new trends and China’s responses from perspective of scientific and technological revolution,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 40
:
Iss.
3
, Article 13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20240510002
Available at:
https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol40/iss3/13
Included in
Defense and Security Studies Commons, Information Security Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons