Construction of data factor circulation law system in the United States and its reflection for China

Authors

Zihan LIN, Shanghai Data Exchange, Shanghai 201203,ChinaFollow
Youmei MA, Law School, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Feng GUO, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, Beijing 100083, China; Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaFollow

Keywords

data factor, government data, data opening and sharing, circulation and exchange

Document Type

Information & Observation

Abstract

As a pioneer country in the global digital economy, the United States has established a relatively complete system for the circulation of data elements. The focus is on government data openness, with the United States forming a legislative system for data openness at both federal and state levels to ensure data freedom and openness. In the field of personal data trading, the United States has established a relatively relaxed legal environment and data brokers to promote data circulation and trading. At present, China is actively promoting the market-oriented allocation reform of data elements, building a multi-level data element market, and continuously improving the relevant systems for data element circulation and trading. By comparing the legislative systems of data openness and personal data trading between China and the United States, it is believed that China can learn from the beneficial experience of the United States, accelerate the construction of a unified platform for government data openness and sharing, cultivate and develop data brokers, promote the construction of legislation related to government data openness and data trading circulation, and improve China’s data element circulation system.

First page

2101

Last Page

2109

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1. 张勇进, 王璟璇. 主要发达国家大数据政策比较研究. 中国行政管理, 2014(12): 113-117. Zhang Y J, Wang J X. Comparative studies on big data policy of main developed countries. Chinese Public Administration, 2014(12): 113-117. (in Chinese)

2. 闫希敏, 张琳琳. 电信和互联网行业数据共享安全管理初探. 信息通信技术与政策, 2023, 49(5): 73-79. Yan X M, Zhang L L. Discussion on security management of data sharing in telecommunications and Internet industries. Information and Communications Technology and Policy, 2023, 49(5): 73-79. (in Chinese)

3. 东方, 邓灵斌. 政府数据开放的法律规制：美国立法与中国路径——基于美国《开放政府数据法》（OGDA）的思考.情报资料工作, 2021, 42(5): 50-57. Dong F, Deng L B. Legal regulation of government data opening: american legislation and China’s path: Reflection based on the US the open, public, electronic, and necessary (OPEN) government data act. Information and Documentation Services, 2021, 42(5): 50-57. (in Chinese)

4. 林慰曾. 数据爬虫技术对金融信息安全的冲击及制度回应. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 35(4): 161-169. Lin W Z. Impact of data crawler technology on financial information security and the institutional responses. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 35(4): 161-169. (in Chinese)

5. 邱诗韵, 林梓瀚. 我国数据要素市场的制度构建与上海的实践探索. 国际大都市发展研究（中英文）, 2024, (4): 59-72. Qiu S Y, Lin Z H. Institutional construction of China’s data element market and practical exploration in Shanghai. Journal of Metropolitan Development Research (Chinese and English), 2024, (4): 59-72.

6. 张继红, 文露. 美国《加州隐私权法案》评述. 中国信息安全, 2021, (3): 73-76. Zhang J H, Wen L. Review of the California Privacy Act in the United States. China Information Security, 2021, (3): 73-76. (in Chinese)

7. 刘颖, 郝晓慧. 个人数据交易的法律基础. 学术研究, 2022, (11): 85-94. Liu Y, Hao X H. The legal basis of personal data trading. Academic Research, 2022, (11): 85-94. (in Chinese)

8. 黄如花, 温芳芳. 我国政府数据开放共享的政策框架与内容：国家层面政策文本的内容分析. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(20): 12-25. Huang R H, Wen F F. Policy framework and content of opening and sharing government data in China: A content analysis of policy documents at the national level. Library And Information Service, 2017, 61(20): 12-25. (in Chinese)

9. 刘建新, 徐焕然. 我国政府数据开放共享保障机制研究：现状、问题与对策. 电子知识产权, 2021, (4): 65-77. Liu J X, Xuan H R. Research on the guarantee mechanism of government data open sharing in China: the status, problems and countermeasures. Electronics Intellectual Property, 2021, (4): 65-77. (in Chinese)

10. 徐玖玖. 从“数据”到“可交易数据”：数据交易法律治理范式的转向及其实现. 电子政务, 2022, (12): 80-89. Xu J J. From “Data” to “Tradeable data”: The shift and implementation of legal governance paradigm in data trading. E-Government, 2022, (12): 80-89. (in Chinese)

11. 廖嘉林. 政府数据开放的立法进路——基于35部地方立法文本的考察. 南海法学, 2023, 7(2): 78-92. Liao J L. The legislative approach to government data openness: An examination based on 35 local legislative texts. The South China Sea Law Journal, 2023, 7(2): 78-92. (in Chinese)

Recommended Citation

LIN, Zihan; MA, Youmei; and GUO, Feng (2024) "Construction of data factor circulation law system in the United States and its reflection for China," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 40 : Iss. 11 , Article 18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/j.issn.1000-3045.20240303002
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol40/iss11/18