•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Debin DU, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, ChinaFollow
Dezhong DUAN, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, ChinaFollow
Qiang ZHANG, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Yingjie YU, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Weidong GUO, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Ziwei JIANG, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Xiya LI, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Han SU, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Qixiang LI, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Yuling CHEN, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Zhihao SHI, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Haiqiao LI, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Siqi YU, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Junfeng DING, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Kaixin WANG, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Yihan HUI, Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Keywords

global science and technology innovation centers; evaluation system; global pattern; countermeasures and suggestions

Document Type

Information & Observation

Abstract

Drawing on the essence of global science and technology innovation (STI) centers, this study evaluates the level of science and technology innovation of 140 cities worldwide by constructing a five forces assessment model of global STI centers, which includes 33 indicators in 5 dimensions. The analysis reveals a significant tripartite pattern of development in global STI centers across Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region. However, divergent patterns emerge in the development of these centers across different regions. Notably, global STI centers in various regions follow distinct development trajectories. At the national level, the United States and China lead the development of global STI centers, with the former demonstrating comprehensive leadership across various dimensions. In contrast, China’s centers exhibit notable deficiencies in attracting and nurturing top-tier talent, cultivating leading subjects in science and technology, and building an innovative environment. Lastly, this study proposes targeted strategies and recommendations for establishing a globally significant talent hub, strengthening national strategic scientific and technological capabilities, and optimizing the supportive environment for scientific and technological innovation based on the shortcomings and challenges faced by China’s STI centers.

First page

1647

Last Page

1659

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 杜德斌. 全球科技创新中心：理论与实践. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2024. Du D B. Global Science and Technological Innovation Centres: Theory and Practice. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2024. (in Chinese)

2 杜德斌. 全球科技创新中心：世界趋势与中国的实践. 科学, 2018, 70(6): 15-18.Du D B. Global S&T innovation center: World trends and practice in China. Science, 2018, 70(6): 15-18. (in Chinese)

3 张文忠. 中国不同层级科技创新中心的布局与政策建议. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(12): 1745-1756.Zhang W Z. Layout and suggestions on China’s science and technology innovation centers at different levels. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(12): 1745-1756. (in Chinese)

4 贝尔纳. 历史上的科学. 伍况甫, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1959.Belluna J D. Science in History. Translated by Wu K P. Beijing: Science Press, 1959. (in Chinese)

5 Yuasa M. Center of scientific activity: Its shift from the 16th to the 20th century. Japanese Studies in the History of Science, 1962, 1(1): 57-75.

6 杜德斌, 张仁开, 祝影, 等. 上海创建国际产业研发中心的战略研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2005, 26(4): 23-29. Du D B, Zhang R K, Zhu Y, et al. Strategic studies for Shanghai’s making an international manufacturing R & D hub. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2005, 26(4): 23-29. (in Chinese)

7 胡晓辉, 杜德斌. 科技创新城市的功能内涵、评价体系及判定标准. 经济地理, 2011, 31(10): 1625-1629.Hu X H, Du D B. Function contents of S & T innovative city and its evaluation index system and criterion. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(10): 1625-1629. (in Chinese)

8 张赛飞, 刘晓丽. 国际科技创新枢纽内涵与广州功能定位. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(8): 34-40.Zhang S F, Liu X L. Connotation of international science and technology innovation hub and functional positioning of Guangzhou. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(8): 34-40. (in Chinese)

9 杜德斌. 对加快建成具有全球影响力科技创新中心的思考. 红旗文稿, 2015, (12): 25-27.Du D B. Reflections on accelerating the construction of a scientific and technological innovation centre with global influence. Red Flag Manuscript, 2015, (12): 25-27. (in Chinese)

10 杜德斌. 全球科技创新中心：动力与模式. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2015. Du D B. Global Science and Technology Innovation Centres: Dynamics and Models. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2015. (in Chinese)

11 杜德斌, 何舜辉. 全球科技创新中心的内涵、功能与组织结构. 中国科技论坛, 2016, (2): 10-15. Du D B, He S H. The connotation, function and organization of global S&T innovation center. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2016, (2): 10-15. (in Chinese)

12 杜德斌, 段德忠, 夏启繁. 中美科技竞争力比较研究. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(4): 1-11. Du D B, Duan D Z, Xia Q F. A comparative study of Sino-US science and technology competitiveness. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(4): 1-11. (in Chinese)

13 杜德斌, 祝影. 全球科技创新中心：内涵特征与评价体系. 科学, 2022, 74(4): 1-5. Du D B, Zhu Y. Global S&T innovation center: Conceptual connotation, key features and evaluation systems. Science, 2022, 74(4): 1-5. (in Chinese)

14 杜德斌, 祝影. 全球科技创新中心：构成要素与创新生态系统. 科学, 2022, 74(4): 6-10. Du D B, Zhu Y. Global S&T innovation center: Constituent units and innovation ecosystem. Science, 2022, 74(4): 6-10. (in Chinese)

15 杜德斌, 祝影. 全球科技创新中心：发展模式与中国实践. 科学, 2022, 74(4): 11-15. Du D B, Zhu Y. Global S&T innovation center: Development model and practice in China. Science, 2022, 74(4): 11-15. (in Chinese)

16 祝影, 唐春光, 孙锐, 等. 基于系统耦合的中国科技创新城市评价. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(24): 30-39. Zhu Y, Tang C G, Sun R, et al. Evaluation of China science and technology innovation city based on system coupling. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(24): 30-39. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS