•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

Nature-based Solutions; adaptive management; landscape scale; community participation

Document Type

Scientific Focus

Abstract

The Qinghai-Xizang Plateau plays an important role as an ecological security barrier for China and the world, where the ecological environment has generally improved in recent years. Nevertheless, the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau still faces management challenges in dealing with the three relationships, namely, key problems and coordinated governance, natural recovery and artificial restoration, and high-quality development and high-level protection. This study proposes the application of “Nature-based Solutions” for adaptive management, including the implementation of ecological protection and restoration planning based on the “three-scale framework”, the ecological protection and restoration projects adaptation management under climate change and human disturbance based on quantitative ecological monitoring, assessment and early warning data, and the participation of local communities in ecological protection and restoration based on stakeholder synergy governance. Thus, the nature-based optimization and management on integrated ecological conservation and restoration of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau can be realized.

First page

1123

Last Page

1130

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 傅伯杰, 欧阳志云, 施鹏, 等. 青藏高原生态安全屏障状况与保护对策. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(11): 1298-1306.Fu B J, Ouyang Z Y, Shi P, et al. Current condition and protection strategies of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau ecological security barrier. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(11): 1298-1306. (in Chinese)

2 孙鸿烈, 郑度, 姚檀栋, 等. 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设. 地理学报, 2012, 67(1): 3-12.Sun H L, Zheng D, Yao T D, et al. Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(1): 3-12. (in Chinese)

3 石菊松, 马小霞. 关于青藏高原生态保护治理的几点思考和建议. 环境与可持续发展, 2021, 46(5): 42-46.Shi J S, Ma X X. Some thoughts and suggestions for ecological protection and governance of the Tibetan Plateau. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2021, 46(5): 42-46. (in Chinese)

4 王军, 张骁, 高岩. 青藏高原植被动态与环境因子相互关系的研究现状与展望. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 70-82.Wang J, Zhang X, Gao Y. The relationships between vegetation dynamics and environmental factors on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A review of research progress and prospect. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(4): 70-82. (in Chinese)

5 陈东军, 钟林生, 樊杰, 等. 青藏高原国家公园群功能评价与结构分析. 地理学报, 2022, 77(1): 196-213.Chen D J, Zhong L S, Fan J, et al. Function evaluation and structure analysis of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Cluster. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(1): 196-213. (in Chinese)

6 王超, 侯鹏, 刘晓曼, 等. 中国重要生态系统保护和修复工程区域植被覆盖时空变化研究. 生态学报, 2023, 43(21): 8903-8916.Wang C, Hou P, Liu X M, et al. Spatiotemporal changes in vegetation cover of the national key ecosystem protection and restoration project areas, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(21): 8903-8916. (in Chinese)

7 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告. 求是, 2022, (21): 4-35.Xi J P. Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive in unity to build a modern socialist country in all respects-report in the 20th national congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Qiu Shi, 2022, (21): 4-35. (in Chinese)

8 习近平. 推进生态文明建设需要处理好几个重大关系. 求是, 2023, (22): 4-7.Xi J P. Promoting the construction of ecological civilization needs to deal with several major relations. Qiu Shi, 2023, (22): 4-7. (in Chinese)

9 王军, 杨崇曜. 关于基于自然解决方案的争议与思考. 中国土地, 2022, (2): 21-23.Wang J, Yang C Y. Controversy and reflection on natural-based solutions. China Land, 2022, (2): 21-23. (in Chinese)

10 罗明, 周旭, 周妍. “基于自然的解决方案”在中国的本土化实践. 中国土地, 2021, (1): 12-15.Luo M, Zhou X, Zhou Y. Localization practice of “nature-based solution” in China. China Land, 2021, (1): 12-15. (in Chinese)

11 国家发展和改革委员会, 自然资源部. 全国重要生态系统保护和修复重大工程总体规划（2021—2035年）. (2020-06-03)[2024-03-01]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/12/content_5518982.htm.National Development and Reform Commission, People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Natural Resources, People’s Republic of China. Master Plan on Major Projects for the Conservation and Restoration of National Key Ecosystems (2021-2035). (2020-06-03)[2024-03-01]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/12/content_5518982.htm.(in Chinese)

12 Fu B J, Liu Y X, Meadows M E. Ecological restoration for sustainable development in China. National Science Review, 2023, 10(7): nwad033.

13 Zhang X, Wang J, Gao Y, et al. Variations and controlling factors of vegetation dynamics on the Qingzang Plateau of China over the recent 20 years. Geography and Sustainability, 2021, 2(1): 74-85.

14 Wei D, Qi Y H, Ma Y M, et al. Plant uptake of CO2 outpaces losses from permafrost and plant respiration on the Tibetan Plateau. PNAS, 2021, 118(33): e2015283118.

15 王小丹, 程根伟, 赵涛, 等. 西藏生态安全屏障保护与建设成效评估. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(1): 29-34.Wang X D, Cheng G W, Zhao T, et al. Assessment on protection and construction of ecological safety shelter for Tibet. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(1): 29-34. (in Chinese)

16 黄萍, 徐卫华, 范馨悦, 等. 青藏高原珍稀濒危哺乳动物保护优先区评价与空缺分析. 环境保护科学, 2022, 48(3): 1-6. Huang P, Xu W H, Fan X Y, et al. Conservation priority areas appraisal and gap analysis of rare mammals on Tibet Plateau. Environmental Protection Science, 2022, 48(3): 1-6. (in Chinese)

17 He C Y, Liu Z F, Wu J G, et al. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 4667.

18 武胜男, 张曦, 高晓霞, 等. 三江源区“黑土滩”型退化草地人工恢复植物群落的演替动态. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7): 2444-2453.Wu S N, Zhang X, Gao X X, et al. Succession dynamics of a plant community of degraded alpine meadow during the human-induced restoration process in the Three Rivers Source region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(7): 2444-2453. (in Chinese)

19 毛绍娟, 李红琴, 罗谨, 等. 日月山高寒草甸不同恢复措施下14年恢复效果分析. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(10): 2413-2420.Mao S J, Li H Q, Luo J, et al. Restoration effects of different restoration measures in 14 years in Riyue Mountain alpine meadow. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(10): 2413-2420. (in Chinese)

20 安宝晟, 姚檀栋, 郭燕红, 等. 拉萨河流域典型区域保护、修复、治理技术示范体系. 科学通报, 2021, 66(22): 2775-2784.An B S, Yao T D, Guo Y H, et al. Protection, restoration, and governance technology demonstration system in the typical regions of the Lhasa River Basin. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(22): 2775-2784. (in Chinese)

21 王鹏, 秦思彤, 胡慧蓉. 近30 a拉萨河流域土地利用变化和生境质量的时空演变特征. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 492-503. Wang P, Qin S T, Hu H R. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of land use change and habitat quality in the Lhasa River Basin over the past three decades. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(3): 492-503. (in Chinese)

22 李洪庆, 杨瑀, 李文麒, 等. 草原生态保护补助奖励标准评价——以山南市为案例. 资源科学, 2023, 45(8): 1662-1675.Li H Q, Yang Y, Li W Q, et al. Evaluation of the standards of subsidy and reward for grassland ecological protection: A case study of Shannan City. Resources Science, 2023, 45(8): 1662-1675. (in Chinese)

23 联合国环境规划署. 支持可持续发展的基于自然的解决方案. 内罗毕: 联合国环境规划署, 2022.United Nations Environment Programme. Nature-based Solutions for supporting sustainable development. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 2022. (in Chinese)

24 王晨旭, 刘焱序, 于超月, 等. 国土空间生态修复布局研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1925-1941.Wang C X, Liu Y X, Yu C Y, et al. Research progress on the arrangement of territorial ecological restoration. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(11): 1925-1941. (in Chinese)

25 International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions: A User-Friendly Framework for the Verification, Design and Scaling Up of NbS : first edition. Gland: IUCN, 2020.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS