•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

Yellow River Basin; regional science and technology innovation competitiveness; comparative analysis; indicator system; regional differences

Document Type

Research and Countermeasures of S&T Innovation in the Yellow River Basin

Abstract

The assessment and comparison of the S&T innovation competitiveness among the provinces and regions in the Yellow River Basin are helpful to better utilize the supporting and leading role of S&T innovation in the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin. Combined with the real characteristics of S&T innovation in the Yellow River Basin, the study considers five dimensions horizontally: S&T innovation input, S&T innovation output, S&T entrepreneurial condition, S&T innovation revenue, and S&T innovation influence. Vertically, it considers two types of indicators, namely, strength and efficiency, and constructs the index system of evaluation of S&T innovation competitiveness in the Yellow River Basin. A multi-dimensional indicator system for measuring the competitiveness of S&T innovation in the Yellow River Basin is constructed, taking into account the differences in scale and efficiency indicators. Based on this, the study analyzes the evolution trend and current situation of S&T innovation competitiveness of the nine provinces and regions in the Yellow River Basin from 2012 to 2021, and further compares the differences in S&T innovation competitiveness among the provinces and regions in the Yellow River Basin. The study finds the followings. (1) The nine provinces and regions in the Yellow River Basin have formed three echelons with significant differences in the level of S&T innovation competitiveness, and the upstream provinces and regions lag behind noticeably in S&T innovation competitiveness. (2) The evaluation results of five horizontal dimensions show that the low level of S&T entrepreneurship conditions and S&T innovation benefit are the key factors constraining the S&T innovation competitiveness of all provinces and regions in the Yellow River Basin. (3) The results of vertical “strength-efficiency” evaluation show that Shandong Province, which is in the first echelon of S&T innovation competitiveness in the Yellow River Basin, should focus on improving its competitive effectiveness in S&T innovation, while the provinces and regions in the third echelon (Inner Mongolia, Qinghai, Gansu, Shanxi, and Ningxia) should optimize their competitive strength in S&T innovation. Finally, the study proposes countermeasures to improve the competitiveness of S&T innovation in the Yellow River Basin.

First page

957

Last Page

970

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 陈明华, 王哲, 李倩, 等. 黄河流域高质量发展的不平衡不充分测度及成因. 当代经济研究, 2022, (9): 57-70.Chen M H, Wang Z, Li Q, et al. Measurement and causes of unbalanced and insufficient high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. Contemporary Economic Research, 2022, (9): 57-70. (in Chinese)

2 WIPO. Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty. Geneva: WIPO, 2023.

3 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). European Innovation Scoreboard 2023. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.

4中国科技发展战略研究小组, 中国科学院大学中国创新创业管理研究中心. 中国区域创新能力评价报告-2023. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2023.China Science and Technology Development Strategy Research Group, China Innovation and Entrepreneurship Management Research Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Evaluation Report of China’s Regional Innovation Capability-2023. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Academic Press, 2023. (in Chinese)

5 中国科学技术发展战略研究院. 中国区域科技创新评价报告-2023. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2023.China Academy of Science and Technology Development Strategy. China Regional Science and Technology Innovation Evaluation Report-2023. Beijing: Science and Technology Academic Press, 2023. (in Chinese)

6 陈凯华. 国家创新力测度与国际比较. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022. hen K H. Measurement and International Comparison of National Innovative Power. Beijing: Science Press, 2022. (in Chinese)

7 陈凯华. 国家科技竞争力报告2023. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2023.Chen K H. The Report on National Science and Technology Competitiveness 2023. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2023. (in Chinese)

8 李雨晨, 陈凯华. 面向创新链的国家创新力测度体系构建研究——多维创新指数的视角. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(11): 45-57.Li Y C, Chen K H. The innovation chain-oriented construction of national innovation force measurement system—The perspective of multidimensional innovation index. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2019, 40(11): 45-57. (in Chinese)

9 陈凯华, 张超, 薛晓宇. 国家创新力测度与国际比较：2006—2020年. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5): 685-697.Chen K H, Zhang C, Xue X Y. National innovation force measurement and international comparison: 2006–2020. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5): 685-697. (in Chinese)

10 陈凯华, 温馨, 张超. 国家科技竞争力测度、演进与国际比较. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(1): 163-175.Chen K H, Wen X, & Zhang C. Measurement, evolution and international comparison of national science and technology competitiveness. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(1): 163-175. (in Chinese)

11 刘佳琪, 许紫菁. 创新链视角下科技创新平台建设路径研究——以东营市为例. 科技创新与应用, 2022, 12(35): 16-18.Liu J Q, Xu Z J. Construction path of science and technology innovation platform from the perspective of innovation chain—A case study of Dongying City. Technology Innovation and Application, 2022, 12(35): 16-18. (in Chinese)

12 张文忠. 中国不同层级科技创新中心的布局与政策建议. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(12): 1745-1756.Zhang W Z. Layout and suggestions on China’s science and technology innovation centers at different levels. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(12): 1745-1756. (in Chinese)

13 黄从利, 周非特, 徐祥, 等. 加强应用支撑型重大科技基础设施建设，增强我国高质量发展的科技基础能力. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(3): 423-435.Huang C L, Zhou F T, Xu X, et al. Strengthen establishment of application-supported major science and technology infrastructure to enhance basic capacity of science and technology for high-quality development. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(3): 423-435. (in Chinese)

14 秦进, 谈世鑫, 沈义竹, 等. “一带一路”科技创新人才培养：中国优势、挑战与关键路径. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(9): 1325-1342.Qin J, Tan S X, Shen Y Z, et al. Cultivation of scientific and technological innovation talents for the Belt and Road Initiative: China’s advantages, challenges and critical paths. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(9): 1325-1342. (in Chinese)

15李敏, 张先恩, 刘云. 全球主要经济体企业科技创新版图分析及启示——中国企业加强基础研究是建设创新型国家的必然选择.中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(9): 1270-1280.Li M, Zhang X E, Liu Y. Building an innovative nation in China calls for strengthening of basic research in China’s enterprises: Findings from innovation mapping of enterprises in major global economies. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(9): 1270-1280. (in Chinese)

16 张翼, 曹蓉, 孙哲. 府际科技合作何以可能——基于长三角科技创新共同体的扎根理论研究. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 1-102024-04-30.Zhang Y, Cao R, & Sun Z. Why is inter-governmental cooperation in science and technology possible? An analysis of the Yangtze River Delta science and technology innovation community based on grounded theory. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024, 1-10. (in Chinese)

17 迟婧茹, 任孝平, 李子愚, 等. 加快构建具有全球竞争力的开放创新生态，推动更高水平科技创新开放合作. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(2): 270-281.Chi J R, Ren X P, Li Z Y, et al. Accelerate to establish globally-competitive open innovation ecosystem, promote high-level open cooperation in science, technology and innovation. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(2): 270-281. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS