Comparison of open sharing modes of foreign large-scale scientific facilities and implications for China

Authors

Dacheng SONG, School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaFollow
Shuai XIAO, Science and Technology Innovation Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Tianming LI, Science and Technology Innovation Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Ke WEN, School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaFollow
Dingyi YOU, School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Chen ZHANG, Science and Technology Innovation Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Qiang WEI, Science and Technology Innovation Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Runtong GUO, School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Keywords

large-scale scientific facilities,resource scarcity,resource sustainability,open sharing modes,case comparison

Document Type

Theory and Practice of Major S&T Infrastructure Construction in the New Era

Abstract

The open sharing of large-scale scientific facilities plays a pivotal role in the ecosystem of open science. This is of great significance for promoting the development of science and technology, enhancing innovation cooperation, and boosting the overall competitive strength of nations. Starting from two dimensions of resource scarcity and sustainability, this study systematically sorts out four open sharing modes of large-scale scientific facilities: the public and inclusive sharing mode, the market response sharing mode, the intensive guarantee sharing mode, and the Strategic Cooperation Sharing Mode. Through the comparison analysis of four foreign large-scale scientific facilities, the study further elaborates the basic characteristics and applicable conditions of different open sharing modes. Finally, based on the in-depth analysis of the above modes, the implications for promoting the open sharing of large-scale scientific facilities in China are discussed.

First page

447

Last Page

458

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 郭华东, 陈和生, 闫冬梅, 等. 加强开放数据基础设施建设, 推动 开放 科学 发展. 中国 科学 院院 刊, 2023, 38(6):806-817. Guo H D, Chen H S, Yan D M, et al. Strengthening open data infrastructure and promoting open science. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(6):806-817. (in Chinese)

2 曲建升, 刘春江, 田倩飞, 等. 面向开放科学的元出版理念与平台建设实践. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(7):1023- 1036. Qu J S, Liu C J, Tian Q F, et al. Philosophy of meta publishing and practice of platform construction toward open science. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38 (7):1023-1036. (in Chinese)

3 张智雄, 张梦婷, 林歆, 等. 开放科学环境下全球科技期刊的发展态势. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(6):795-805. Zhang Z X, Zhang M T, Lin X, et al. Developing trend of global scientific journals in open science environment. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(6):795- 805. (in Chinese)

4 Hallonsten O, Heinze T. Institutional persistence through gradual organizational adaptation:Analysis of national laboratories in the USA and Germany. Science and Public Policy, 2012, 39(4):450-463.

5 Papon P. European scientific cooperation and research infrastructures:Past tendencies and future prospects. Minerva, 2004, 42(1):61-76.

6 王贻芳. 中国重大科技基础设施的现状和未来发展. 科技导报, 2023, 41(4):5-13. Wang Y F. Current status and future prospects of the national major infrastructure for science and technology. Science & Technology Review, 2023, 41(4):5-13. (in Chinese)

7 陈岸明, 魏东原. 粤港澳大湾区重大科技基础设施布局的优化分析——基于国际比较的视角. 国际经贸探索, 2020, 36(10):86-99. Chen A M, Wei D Y. Optimal analysis of the layout of major science and technology infrastructure in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area:Based on the perspective of international comparison. International Economics and Trade Research, 2020, 36(10):86-99. (in Chinese)

8 王立伟, 刘军, 张爱平, 等. 长三角重大科技基础设施共建共享机制探索. 科技导报, 2022, 40(9):14-19. Wang L W, Liu J, Zhang A P, et al. Exploration on the coconstruction and sharing mechanism of large scale scientific facilities in the Yangtze River Delta. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(9):14-19. (in Chinese)

9 王贻芳, 白云翔. 发展国家重大科技基础设施引领国际科技创新. 管理世界, 2020, 36(5):172-188. Wang Y F, Bai Y X. Developing mega-science facility to lead the innovation globally. Management World, 2020, 36(5):172-188. (in Chinese)

10 李华东, 张晶晶, 刘细文. 重大科技基础设施对学科领域发展影响的计量评价——以对撞机为例. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(8):74-81. Li H D, Zhang J J, Liu X W. Quantitative evaluation of the impact of large research infrastructures on the discipline development:Taking colliders as an example. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(8):74-81. (in Chinese)

11 敦帅, 陈强, 陈力, 等. 重大科技基础设施运行效益影响机制研究——基于""投入-产出""视角的定性比较分析. 中国软科学, 2021(4):11-21. Dun S, Chen Q, Chen L, et al. Study on the impact mechanism of operational benefits of large research infrastructure:Qualitative comparative analysis based on the perspective of ""input-output"". China Soft Science, 2021(4):11-21. (in Chinese)

12 乔黎黎. 重大科技基础设施评价机制研究. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(1):33-41. Qiao L L. Research on the evaluation mechanism of large research infrastructure. Studies in Science of Science, 2021, 39(1):33-41. (in Chinese)

13 Qiao L L, Mu R P, Chen K H. Scientific effects of large research infrastructures in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 112:102-112.

14 张渤, 王雪, 孙从理. 重组后的全国重点实验室科技经费配置政策研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(11):1698-1709. Zhang B, Wang X, Sun C L. Policy research on allocation of science and technology funds for state key laboratory after reorganization. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(11):1698-1709. (in Chinese)

15 Mullainathan S, Shafir E. Scarcity:Why Having Too Little Means So Much. New York:Macmillan, 2013.

16 Norgaard R B. Economic indicators of resource scarcity:A critical essay. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1990, 19(1):19-25.

17 Rogow A A, Simon H A, Komarovsky M. Models of man:Social and rational. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 1957, 1(3/4):352.

18 Damanpour F, Schneider M. Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations:Effects of environment, organization and top Managers1. British Journal of Management, 2006, 17(3):215-236.

19 Kinney A L. National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. PNAS, 2007, 104(46):17943-17947.

20 Kuhlman T, Farrington J. What is sustainability?. Sustainability, 2010, 2(11):3436-3448.

21 Hillman A J, Withers M C, Collins B J. Resource dependence theory:A review. Journal of Management, 2009, 35(6):1404- 1427.

22 Reitz H J, Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations:A resource dependence perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4(2):309.

23 Lee S H, Peng M W, Song S. Governments, entrepreneurs, and positive externalities:A real options perspective. European Management Journal, 2013, 31(4):333-347.

24 Yu N N, Dong Y Y, de Jong M. A helping hand from the government? How public research funding affects academic output in less-prestigious universities in China. Research Policy, 2022, 51(10):104591.

25 孙昌璞. 合理运用市场机制,实现基础研究多元化协同支持. 科学与社会, 2020, 10(4):5-8. Sun C P. Achieving diversified and collaborative support for basic research by using market mechanisms. Science and Society, 2020, 10(4):5-8. (in Chinese)

26 樊建平. 蝴蝶模式:大科学时代科研范式的创新探索——基于中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 15 年科学与产业融合发展的实践. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5):708-716. Fan J P. Butterfly pattern:Innovative exploration of scientific research paradigm in era of big science-Based on 15-year practice of integrated development of science and industry in Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (SIAT), Chinese Academy of Sciences. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5):708-716. (in Chinese)

27 章萍. 重大科技基础设施公私合作路径研究——基于""伽利略""计划的启示. 科学与社会, 2021, 11(1):31-43. Zhang P. Research on the path of public-private partnership in major scientific and technological infrastructure-Based on the inspiration of the ""Galileo"" project. Science and Society, 2021, 11(1):31-43. (in Chinese)

28 陈力, 刘笑, 陈强. 社会资本参与重大公共科技基础设施建设面临问题及对策——来自国外科技领域公私合作的经验与启示. 中国软科学, 2017, (6):14-20. Chen L, Liu X, Chen Q. Problems and countermeasures in the participation of social capital in the construction of major public S & T infrastructures:Experience and enlightenment from public-private partnership in science and technology fields abroad. China Soft Science, 2017, (6):14-20. (in Chinese)

29 常旭华, 仲东亭. 国家实验室及其重大科技基础设施的管理体系分析. 中国软科学, 2021(6):13-22. Chang X H, Zhong D T. Study on management system of nation's laboratory and its large research infrastructure. China Soft Science, 2021(6):13-22. (in Chinese)

30 李泽霞, 郭世杰, 董璐, 等. 趋势观察:国际重大科技基础设施布局特点及发展趋势. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(4):514-516. Li Z X, Guo S J, Dong L, et al. Trends observation:Layout features and development trends of major international science and technology infrastructure. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(4):514-516. (in Chinese)

31 夏金瑶, 尹红星, 邓泉, 等. EAST 重大科技基础设施开放共享机制. 中国科学基金, 2023, 37(4):692-698. Xia J Y, Yin H X, Deng Q, et al. Research on the open and sharing mechanism of EAST major scientific and technological infrastructure. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2023, 37(4):692-698. (in Chinese)

32 胡艳, 张安伟. 新发展格局下大科学装置共建共享路径研究. 区域经济评论, 2022, (2):112-119. Hu Y, Zhang A W. Research on the path of co-construction and sharing of large-scale scientific facilities under the new development pattern. Regional Economic Review, 2022, (2):112-119. (in Chinese)

33 王婷, 蔺洁, 陈凯华. 面向2035构建以重大科技基础设施为核心的基础研究生态体系. 中国科技论坛, 2020, (8):7-9. Wang T, Lin J, Chen K H. Building a basic research ecosystem with major scientific and technological infrastructure as the core for 2035. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2020, (8):7-9. (in Chinese)

34 王慧斌, 白惠仁. 德国大科学装置的开放共享机制及启示. 中国科学基金, 2019, 33(3):308-312. Wang H B, Bai H R. Enlightenment of German mechanism of opening and sharing large-scale scientific facilities. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2019, 33(3):308-312. (in Chinese)

35 Schroeder R. E-research infrastructures and open science:Towards a new system of knowledge production? 1. Prometheus, 2007, 25(1), doi:10.1080/08109020601172860.

36 温珂, 宋大成, 游玎怡, 等. 政策计量视角下我国科学数据开 放共 享政 策演 进与 体系 构建. 科学 通报, 2023, doi:10.1360/TB-2023-0394. Wen K, Song D C, You D Y, et al. Features and current situation of the evolution of China's scientific data open sharing policy from the perspective of policy bibliometric. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2023, doi:10.1360/TB-2023-0394. (in Chinese)

37 Vicente-Saez R, Martinez-Fuentes C. Open Science now:A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 88:428-436.

38 National High Magnetic Field Laboratory. Full 2022 annual report. (2024-04-10)[2024-01-27]. https://nationalmaglab.org/about-the-maglab/facts-figures/annual-report/.

Recommended Citation

SONG, Dacheng; XIAO, Shuai; LI, Tianming; WEN, Ke; YOU, Dingyi; ZHANG, Chen; WEI, Qiang; and GUO, Runtong (2024) "Comparison of open sharing modes of foreign large-scale scientific facilities and implications for China," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 39 : Iss. 3 , Article 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20240129003
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol39/iss3/3