Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


innovation chain, industrial chain, fund chain, talent chain, national innovation system

Document Type

Strategy & Policy Decision Research


Promoting the integrated development of innovation chain, industrial chain, capital chain, and talent chain is of great significance to the high-quality development of the economy, and its essence is to reduce the various barriers faced by the flow of innovation elements across organizational boundaries, improve the allocation efficiency, better stimulate the main role of enterprises in scientific and technological innovation, and enhance the overall efficiency of the national innovation system. This study analyzes “four chain” integration and puts forward the following suggestions. First, promote the systematic layout and systematic implementation of scientific and technological innovation policies. Second, explore the construction of “big science and technology intermediaries”, and build a deliberative decision-making mechanism and market-oriented pricing mechanism that conform to the law of innovation. Third, accelerate the formulation of implementation rules for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and clarify the boundaries of responsibilities and rights. Fourth, focus on the development needs of the industrial chain innovation chain, and make forward-looking deployment and construction of the talent chain. Fifth, strengthen the supporting role of fiscal and taxation policies in scientific and technological innovation. Sixth, strengthen the innovation of application scenarios and help increase the market acceptance of domestic new technologies and new products.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


1 郁义鸿.产业链类型与产业链效率基准.中国工业经济, 2005, 22(11):35-42. Yu Y H. Type of industrial chain and the benchmark of industrial chain efficiency. China Industrial Economy, 2005, 22(11):35-42.

2 聂常虹,冀朝旭.社会资金促进应用基础研究成果转化问题研究——以中国科学院为例.中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(7):723-731. Nie C H, Ji Z X. Study on social funds promoting transformation of scientific and technological achievements of basic research-Taking Chinese Academy of Sciences as example. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(7):723-731.(in Chinese)

3 Manufacturing USA. 2019/2020 Highlights Report.(2021-02-22)[2024-01-19]. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ams/NIST.AMS.600-6.pdf.

4 Manufacturing USA.(2022-05-02)[2024-01-19]. https://www.manufacturingusa.com/pages/history.

5 孙毅,罗穆雄.美国智能制造的发展及启示.中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(11):1316-1325. Sun Y, Luo M X. Development and enlightenment of American intelligent manufacturing. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(11):1316-1325.(in Chinese)

6 Spithoven A, Clarysse B, Knockaert M. Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 2010, 30(2):130-141.

7 Knockaert M, Spithoven A, Clarysse B. The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 81:376-387.

8 吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析(八)——对企业是科技成果转化主体的几点认识.科技中国, 2018, 23(1):56-61. Wu S R. Analysis of hot issues of scientific and technological achievement transformation (VIII):Understanding enterprises as the main body of scientific and technological achievement transformation. Science and Technology of China, 2018, 23(1):56-61.(in Chinese)