•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

structural tension; key laboratories; reform of research institutes; reform of academician system; academic culture construction

Document Type

Policy & Management Research

Abstract

Facing the immense challenges of sci-tech transformation, the national urgent needs for building a world power of science and technology, and the strong inertia of its institutional development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has practiced the new reform paradigm, and launched a prudent and resolute, partial and systematic, unified and diverse exploration of sci-tech reform. Firstly, based on the structural paradigm theory proposed by the preceding work, this study introduces CAS’ endeavor to clarify the vision of “seizing the commanding heights of science and technology”, shape multiple structural tensions, and build dual-track reform framework. Secondly, it presents the practice that CAS applied “constructivist”, “ecological” and “nurturing” reform modes to coordinate the research institutes reform by the reorganization of state key laboratories, and to drive the cultural and ecological construction by deepening the reform of academician system. Thirdly, it also summarizes the reform effectiveness and problems, and puts forward suggestions of the dual-track reform on the basis of the J-Curve stage theory. Finally, it is emphasized that the structural reform of CAS is not only the inevitable choice for its own survival and development, but also the pioneering exploration for the national sci-tech development and reform aiming at building China into a world power of science and technology.

First page

1919

Last Page

1930

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 王扬宗. 中国共产党与中国科学院. 中国科学报, 2021-06-29(02).Wang Y Z. The Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. China Science Daily, 2021-06-29(02). (in Chinese)

2 樊纲, 樊建平. 国家战略科技力量：新型科研机构. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2022: 97 Fan G, Fan J P. National Strategic Scientific Force: New Institutes for R&D. Beijing: Economic Press China, 2022: 97. (in Chinese)

3 胡珉琦. “智”强不息，当好科技决策思想库. 中国科学报, 2023-08-11(01).Hu M Q. Make unremitting efforts in ‘Wisdom’, and being a good think tank for scientific and technological decision-making. China Science Daily, 2023-08-11(01). (in Chinese)

4 王敏. 中国科学院贡献了新的大学类型. 中国科学报, 2023-10-26(03).Wang M. The Chinese Academy of Sciences has contributed a new type of university. China Science Daily, 2023-10-26(03). (in Chinese)

5 张月鸿. 科技改革需要构建新范式：理论探析. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(11): 1909-1919.Zhang Y H. Sci-tech system reform requires a new paradigm: Theoretical exploration. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(11): 1909-1919. (in Chinese)

6 费孝通. 小城镇四记. 北京: 新华出版社, 1985.Fei X T. The Four Records of Small Towns. Beijing: Xinhua Publishing House, 1985: 10. (in Chinese)

7 曹效业. 构建适应“出思想”的文化基础. 中国科学院刊, 2012, 27(1): 80-83.Cao X Y. Constructing the cultural foundation for generating scientific thoughts. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 27(1): 80-83. (in Chinese)

8 曹效业.中国科学院的文化传统. 科学与社会, 2011, 1(2): 35-44.Cao X Y. The cultural tradition of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Science and Society, 2011, 1(2): 35-44. (in Chinese)

9 尤尔根·哈贝马斯. 合法化危机. 刘北成, 曹卫东, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2009: 10. Habermas J. Legitimation Crisis. Translated by Liu B C, Cao W D. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2009: 10. (in Chinese)

10 钱学敏. 钱学森的哲学探索. 北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 1994, (4): 61-68. Qian X M. Philosophical Explorations of Qian Xuesen. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 1994, (4): 61-68. (in Chinese)

11 项飙, 吴琦. 把自己作为方法：与项飙谈话. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 2020. Xiang B, Wu Q. Self as Method: Talking to Xiang Biao. Shanghai Literature & Art Publishing House, 2020. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS