•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

Chinese Academy of Sciences, charter, institute, governance, institutionalization

Document Type

History & Inheritance

Abstract

Since its establishment in 1949, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has attached great importance to the construction of institutional system and played an important role in the development of China’s scientific and technological system and national scientific research institutions. At the same time, there are also long-term problems in the academic organization system, the governance of research institutes, the legislation of scientific research institutions, etc. that need to be solved in the new era of deepening reform and system innovation. Taking the establishment of the CAS’s Charter and the Institute’s leadership system as the central clue, this study reviews the historical evolution of the institutional construction of CAS, and discusses its characteristics and related issues.

First page

1699

Last Page

1709

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 张久春. 中国科学院章程制订的历史考察. 自然辩证法通讯, 2006, 28(6): 70-75. Zhang J C. Historical inspection of working out constitution of CAS. Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 2006, 28(6): 70-75. (in Chinese)

2 路振朝. 中国科学院与“科学十四条”的制订. 北京: 中国科学院自然科学史研究所, 2004. Lu Z C, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Fourteen Items about Science (1961). Beijing: Institute for the History of Natural Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2004. (in Chinese)

3 樊洪业. 中国科学院编年史: 1949—1999. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 1999.Fan H Y. The Chronicle of the Chinese Academy of Sciences: 1949-1999. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press, 1999. (in Chinese)

4 王扬宗. 中国科学技术事业的历史性转变——回望1978年全国科学大会. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(4): 351-361.Wang Y Z. Historical transformation of Chinese science and technology—National Science and Technology Conference of 1978 revisited. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(4): 351-361. (in Chinese)

5 郭金海. 1980—1981年院士制度在中国的筹备与搁浅. 科技导报, 2013, 31(30): 49-60.Guo J H. The preparation and the stranding of academician system in China from 1980 to 1981. Science & Technology Review, 2013, 31(30): 49-60. (in Chinese)

6 解源. 制度建设是现代国家科研院所管理体制创新的核心. 中国科学院院刊, 2001, 16(1): 59-61. Xie Y. Institutional development: Key to the managerial system of modern national research institutions. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2001, 16(1): 59-61. (in Chinese)

7 侯建国. 努力抢占科技制高点 加快实现高水平科技自立自强. 人民日报, 2023-07-17(09).Hou J G. Strive to seize the technological high ground and accelerate the realization of high-level technological self-reliance and self-improvement. People’s Daily, 2023-07-17(09). (in Chinese)

8 朱效民. 中国科学院新院章制定的法律背景研究. 科研管理, 2004, 25(6): 126-132.Zhu X M. The juristic study on the coming new charter of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Science Research Management, 2004, 25(6): 126-132. (in Chinese)

9 肖尤丹, 刘海波, 肖冰. 中国科学院法律主体性质及其立法重构. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(10): 1133-1141. Xiao Y D, Liu H B, Xiao B. Nature for legal status of Chinese Academy of Sciences and its restructure. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(10）: 1133-1141. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS