Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
Keywords
national science and technology competitiveness, multi-dimensional comprehensive measurement, international comparison
Document Type
Policy & Management Research
Abstract
The measurement of national science and technology competitiveness helps to describe the international competition pattern, and to provide decision-making reference for future-oriented science and technology policy and strategy formulation. From the perspective of input-process-output, the study proposes a three-dimensional measurement framework of potential-efficiency-strength for national science and technology competitiveness and realizes a multi-dimensional comprehensive measurement of national science and technology competitiveness, which takes the differences in both scale and efficiency into account. Based on The Report on National Science and Technology Competitiveness 2023, the study measures the national science and technology competitiveness of 34 major countries in the world and focuses on the evolution trend of national science and technology competitiveness of 11 countries including China from 2011 to 2022. On this basis, the science and technology competitiveness of 34 countries is further classified and analyzed from the three dimensions of science and technology competitiveness potential, science and technology competitiveness effectiveness, and science and technology competitiveness strength, so as to describe the technological competition pattern of 34 countries and reveal the status quo of China’s science and technology competitiveness. The research has found that the growth rate of China’s science and technology competitiveness has gradually slowed down in recent years, shifting towards a stage of steady growth. However, there is still significant room for improvement compared to leading countries. Among them, the level of China’s science and technology competitiveness strength is relatively high, but the indicators that reflect the quality of China’s technological output are still far from those of major technological powers. China’s science and technology competitiveness potential has improved but the level of intensity indicators is still lower than those of main technological powers. The significant decrease in the science and technology competitiveness effectiveness compared to major technological powers is the main factor restricting the improvement of China’s science and technology competitiveness. Finally, this study puts forward suggestions to improve China’s science and technology competitiveness.
First page
163
Last Page
175
Language
Chinese
Publisher
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
References
1 王昌林, 姜江, 盛朝讯, 等. 大国崛起与科技创新——英国、德国、美国和日本的经验与启示. 全球化, 2015, (9): 39-49. Wang C L, Jiang J, Sheng C X, et al. The rising of great nations and technological innovation—Experiences and inspiration from Britain, Germany, the United States and Japan. Globalization, 2015, (9): 39-49. (in Chinese)
2 Schwab K, Zahidi S, World Economic Forum. The Global Competitiveness Report Special Edition 2020: How Countries are Performing on the Road to Recovery. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2020.
3 International Institute for Management Development. World Competitiveness Yearbook 2020. Lausanne: IMD, 2020.
4 潘教峰. 国际科技竞争力研究报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. Pan J F. Research on International Science and Technology Competitiveness. Beijing: Science Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
5 华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院. 中美科技竞争力评估报告(2019). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2019. Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University. China-U.S. Science and Technology Competitiveness Assessment Report (2019). Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
6 杜德斌, 段德忠. 中美科技竞争力评估报告(2022). 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2022. Du D B, Duan D Z. China-U.S. Science and Technology Competitiveness Assessment Report (2022). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2022. (in Chinese)
7 杜德斌, 段德忠, 夏启繁. 中美科技竞争力比较研究. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(4): 1-11. Du D B, Duan D Z, Xia Q F. A comparative study of Sino-US science and technology competitiveness. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(4): 1-11. (in Chinese)
8 WIPO. Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the Future of Innovation-Driven Growth?. Geneva: WIPO, 2022.
9 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission), Hollanders H, Es-Sadki N, et al. European Innovation Scoreboard 2022. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.
10 穆荣平, 陈凯华. 2020国家创新发展报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022. Mu R P, Chen K H. The Report on National Innovation and Development 2020. Beijing: Science Press, 2022. (in Chinese)
11 穆荣平, 陈凯华. 2019国家创新发展报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021. Mu R P, Chen K H. The Report on National Science and Technology Competitiveness 2019. Beijing: Science Press, 2021. (in Chinese)
12 陈凯华. 国家创新力测度与国际比较. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022. Chen K H. The Report of National Innovation Force Measurement and International Comparison. Beijing: Science Press, 2022. (in Chinese)
13 陈凯华. 国家科技竞争力报告2023. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2023. Chen K H. The Report on National Science and Technology Competitiveness 2023. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2023. (in Chinese)
14 吴忠谦. 国家科技竞争力评价方法比较——基于国际典型案例的分析. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(19): 50-56. Wu Z Q. Comparative study of national science and technology competitiveness evaluation methods: Based on analysis of international typical cases. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(19): 50-56. (in Chinese)
15 穆荣平, 陈凯华. 2019国家科技竞争力报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021. Mu R P, Chen K H. The Report on National Science and Technology Competitiveness 2019. Beijing: Science Press, 2021. (in Chinese)
16 李雨晨, 陈凯华. 面向创新链的国家创新力测度体系构建研究——多维创新指数的视角. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(11): 45-57. Li Y C, Chen K H. The innovation chain-oriented construction of national innovation force measurement system—The perspective of multidimensional innovation index. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2019, 40(11): 45-57. (in Chinese)
17 刘凤朝, 孙玉涛. 国家创新能力测度研究述评. 科学学研究, 2008, (4): 887-893. Liu F C, Sun Y T. Review on the measurement research of national innovation capacity. Studies in Science of Science, 2008, (4): 887-893. (in Chinese)
18 宋河发, 穆荣平. 自主创新能力及其测度方法与实证研究——以我国高技术产业为例. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009, 30(3): 73-80. Song H F, Mu R P. Research on indigenous innovation capacity and its measurement. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2009, 30(3): 73-80. (in Chinese)
19 陈凯华, 张超, 薛晓宇. 国家创新力测度与国际比较:2006—2020年. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5): 685-697. Chen K H, Zhang C, Xue X Y. National Innovation Force measurement and international comparison:2006-2020. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5): 685-697. (in Chinese)
Recommended Citation
CHEN, Kaihua; WEN, Xin; and ZHANG, Chao
(2024)
"Measurement, evolution and international comparison of national science and technology competitiveness,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 39
:
Iss.
1
, Article 18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230317001
Available at:
https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol39/iss1/18
Included in
Models and Methods Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons