•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

artificial intelligence ethics, international soft law, mixed governance, indirect enforcement mechanism

Document Type

Policy & Management Research

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology not only rapidly empowers economic and social development, but may also trigger many ethical issues highly related to the characteristics and development of AI technology itself. The rise of international soft law in the field of AI ethical governance is almost inevitable due to its flexibility, efficiency, low application cost, ability to fill the gap in hard law, and convenience in distinguishing governance and layered response to ethical issues. Under the current situation of developed international soft law and outdated hard law in this field, faced with the governance challenge of unstable cooperation among subjects of international soft law and sometimes unable to be effectively implemented, the governance model has gradually changed towards a combination of soft law and hard law, and the “hardening” of soft law, in order to improve the binding force and enforcement possibility of soft law. It is suggested to construct a “centre-periphery” model of mixed international soft and hard law governance, and construct an indirect enforcement mechanism to improve the international soft law governance strategies of artificial intelligence ethics.

First page

1037

Last Page

1049

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 陈小平. 人工智能伦理导引. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2021. Chen X P. An Interdisciplinary Guide to Artificial Intelligence Ethics. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2021. (in Chinese)

2 高奇琦. 人工智能治理与区块链革命. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2020. Gao Q Q. Artificial Intelligence Governance and Blockchain Revolution. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2020. (in Chinese)

3 莫宏伟,徐立芳. 人工智能伦理导论. 西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2022.Mo H W, Xu L F. Introduction to Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Electronic Science and Technology Press, 2022. (in Chinese)

4 Xue L, Pang Z J. Ethical governance of artificial intelligence: An integrated analytical framework. Journal of Digital Economy, 2022, 1(1): 44-52.

5 胡玉婷.论软法与硬法在多维界分中的渐变——以《巴塞尔协议》为视角. 东方法学, 2014, 38(2): 106-114. Hu Y T. On the gradual change of soft law and hard law in multi-dimensional boundary—From the perspective of Basel Accord. Oriental Law, 2014, 38(2): 106-114. (in Chinese)

6 沈伟, 冯硕. 全球主义抑或本地主义:全球数据治理规则的分歧、博弈与协调. 苏州大学学报(法学版), 2022, 9(3): 34-47. Shen W, Feng S. Globalism or territorialism: difference, game and coordination of global data governance rules. Journal of Soochow University (Law Edition), 2022, 9(3): 34-47. (in Chinese)

7 罗豪才. 软法与公共治理. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006. Luo H C. Soft Law and Public Governance. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2006. (in Chinese)

8 Gruchalla-Wesierski T. A framework for understanding “Soft Law”. McGill Law Journal, 1984, 30(1): 37-88.

9 Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2019, 1(9): 389-399.

10 Marchant G. “Soft law” governance of artificial intelligence. (2019-01-25)[2022-08-30]. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0jq252ks/qt0jq252ks_noSplash_1ff6445b4d4efd438fd6e06cc2df4775.pdf?t=po1uh8.

11 Brookings. How soft law is used in AI governance. (2021-05-27)[2022-08-30]. http://www.brookings.edu/techstream/how-soft-law-is-used-in-ai-governance/.

12 Bailey N, Ferenzy D, Carr B. Data ethics charter. (2021-06-07)[2022-08-30]. https://www.iif.com/portals/0/Files/content/Innovation/06_07_2021_iif_data_ethics_charter.pdf.

13 Eliazàt A. Soft law as a complement to AI regulation. (2021-07-07)[2022-08-30]. https://adolfoeliazat.com/2021/07/07/soft-law-as-a-complement-to-ai-regulation/.

14 罗豪才. 软法的理论与实践. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010. Luo H C, et al. The Theory and Practice of Soft Law. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

15 程莹, 姬祥. 如何在人工智能治理中使用软法?. (2021-07-13)[2023-02-05]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/AP8_ptSy_7Hs_unstZFKrA. Cheng Y, Ji X. How to use soft methods in artificial intelligence governance?. (2021-07-13)[2023-02-05]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/AP8_ptSy_7Hs_unstZFKrA.(in Chinese)

16 鲍坤. 数据平台下个人数据保护规则形态的优化——从软法对硬法的嵌入谈起. 中国科技论坛, 2022, (3): 156-165. Bao K. Optimize the form of personal data protection rules under data platforms—From soft law embedded in hard law. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2022, (3): 156-165. (in Chinese)

17 Cihon P. Standards for AI governance: international standards to enable global coordination in AI research and development. (2019-04-01)[2023-02-06]. https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/Standards_-FHI-Technical-Report.pdf.

18 徐崇利. 全球治理与跨国法律体系:硬法与软法的“中心—外围”之构造. 国外理论动态, 2013, (8): 19-28. Xu C L. Global governance and transnational legal system: The “Central-Peripheral” structure of hard law and soft law. Foreign Theoretical Trends, 2013, (8): 19-28. (in Chinese)

19 Marchant G, Wallach W. Coordinating technology governance. Issues in Science and Technology, 2015, 31(4): 43-50.

20 莫志. 上市公司环境、社会和治理信息披露的软法实现与强化路径. 江西财经大学学报, 2022, (2): 116-129. Mo Z. The implementation and strengthening path of soft laws for ESG information disclosure of listed companies. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2022, (2): 116-129. (in Chinese)

21 Marchant G E. ‘Soft Law’ mechanisms for nanotechnology: liability and insurance drivers. Journal of Risk Research, 2014, 17(6): 709-719.

Share

COinS