basic research, firm innovation, demand-driven, scientific subject, national innovation system
Strategy & Policy Decision Research
Basic research is the source of technological innovation, and currently, public research entities are the main force behind basic research. However, demand-driven research in the Pasteur quadrant and Edison quadrant requires firms to play a major role. The experience of the United States has shown that large firms can directly bridge the gap between science and industrial demand, improve industrial competitiveness, and the key lies in improving their scientific capabilities. Encouraging large firms to invest in demand-driven basic research can accelerate the transfer and transformation of scientific and technological achievements, increase the industrialization of basic research, and fill the demand-side gap in China’s innovation system. Therefore, the government should encourage large firms to become new forces in basic research from multiple dimensions, enhance the international market competitiveness of Chinese firms, and truly achieve technological self- reliance and self-strengthening.
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 柳卸林, 杨培培, 常馨之. 问题导向的基础研究与产业突破性创新. 科学学研究, 2023, doi:10.16192/j. cnki.1003- 2053.20230110.001.
Liu X L, Yang P P, Chang X Z. Problem oriented basic research and industrial breakthrough innovation. Studies in Science of Science, 2023, doi:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230110.001. (in Chinese)
2 杨思洛, 肖敖夏. 完善我国基础研究能力提升策略与保障机制. (2022-12-12)[2023-04-12]. https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2022-12/12/36229714.html. Yang S L, Xiao A X. Improving the Strategy and Guarantee Mechanism for Improving China’s Basic Research Capacity. (2022-12-12)[2023-04-12]. https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2022-12/12/36229714.html. (in Chinese)
3 Bush V. Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington DC: National Science Foundation, 1945.
4 柳卸林, 何郁冰. 基础研究是中国产业核心技术创新的源泉. 中国软科学, 2011, (4): 104-117.
Liu X L, He Y B. Basic research is the source of industrial core technological innovation in China. China Soft Science, 2011, (4): 104-117. (in Chinese)
5 Stokes D E. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC: Bookings Institution Press, 1997.
6 Coase R H. The lighthouse in economics. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1974, 17(2): 357-376.
7 Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
8 Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A. The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(1): 3-32.
9 Jung E Y, Liu X L. The different effects of basic research in enterprises on economic growth: Income-level quantile analysis. Science and Public Policy, 2019, 46(4): 570-588.
10 Hong J P. Causal relationship between ICT R&D investment and economic growth in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 116: 70-75.
11 徐晓丹, 柳卸林. 大企业为什么要重视基础研究？ . 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(9): 3-19.
Xu X D, Liu X L. Why should big enterprises attach importance to basic research?. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2020, 41(9): 3-19. (in Chinese)
12 Gertner J. The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation. New York: Penguin Press, 2012.
13 马双, 陈凯华. 美国基础研究体系：主要特征与经验启示. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(3): 444-453.
Ma S, Chen K H. The U.S. basic research system: Characteristics and implications. Studies in Science of Science, 2023, 41(3): 444-453. (in Chinese)
14 罗洪川, 向体燕, 高玉建, 等. 我国博士毕业生去向及就业特征分析——基于2015—2020年博士毕业生数据的分析. 学位与研究生教育, 2022, (1): 53-62.
Luo H C, Xiang T Y, Gao Y J, et al. Analysis of the employment characters of PhD students after graduation in China. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, 2022, (1): 53-62. (in Chinese)
LIU, Xielin; CHANG, Xinzhi; and YANG, Peipei
"Strengthen Basic Research Capacity of Enterprises and Make Up for Shortcoming of National Innovation System,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 38
, Article 26.
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol38/iss6/26