Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


technology friction, science and technology game, techno-economic security

Document Type

Theory and Practice of Techno-economic Security


In recent years, the United States has seriously hindered the development of science and technology in China by implementing a series of measures such as export controls, economic sanctions, and cooperation restrictions, and United States-China technological frictions have brought a series of major problems related to technological and economic security to Chinese industries and enterprises. Based on the existing research, the study analyzes the current situation of China’s science and technology security, the impact of technological friction on enterprises of China and the United States as well as enterprises of other countries, and puts forward policy recommendations in terms of building a science and technology risk monitoring and early warning mechanism, strengthening the ability of original innovation and strategic technology research, promoting high-quality upgrading of industrial value chain, cultivating forging long-board enterprise subjects and clusters, improving the training and introduction mechanism of scientific and technological talents, actively expanding international cooperation, etc.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


1 刘志鹏,程燕林,代涛,等.技术依赖形成和影响经济安全的机制研究——基于技术经济安全视角.科学学研究, 2022, doi:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220706.001.

Liu Z P, Cheng Y L, Dai T, et al. Research on the mechanism of technological dependence on economic security-Based on the perspective of techno-economic security. Studies in Science of Science, 2022, doi:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220706.001.(in Chinese)

2 陈劲,阳镇,朱子钦.新型举国体制的理论逻辑、落地模式与应用场景.改革, 2021,(5):1-17.

Chen J, Yang Z, Zhu Z Q. The theoretical logic, implementation mode and application scenario of the new type of national system. Reform, 2021,(5):1-17.(in Chinese)

3 薛澜.中国科技创新政策40年的回顾与反思.科学学研究, 2018, 36(12):2113-2115.

Xue L. A review and reflection on 40 years of reform and development of China's STI policy. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(12):2113-2115.(in Chinese)

4 马茹,王宏伟.中国建设世界科技强国的SWOT分析.技术与创新管理, 2019, 40(4):457-464.

Ma R, Wang H W. SWOT analysis of China's construction of a world's science and technology power. Technology and Innovation Management, 2019, 40(4):457-464.(in Chinese)

5 The White House. National Strategy to Secure 5G of the United States of America. Washington:The White House, 2019.

6 邓金堂,刘夏.美中科技""脱钩""视角下中国供应链重塑路径研究.对外经贸实务, 2021,(12):49-52.

Deng J T, Liu X. Research on the path of supply chain remodeling in China from the perspective of ""decoupling"" of US-China science and technology. Practice in Foreign Economic Relations and Trade, 2021,(12):49-52.(in Chinese)

7 周琪.美国对华科技脱钩进程及其影响.当代世界, 2022,(9):32-39.

Zhou Q. Process and influences of U.S. scientific and technological decoupling from China. Contemporary World, 2022,(9):32-39.(in Chinese)

8 代涛,刘志鹏,甘泉,等.技术经济安全评估若干问题的思考.中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(12):1448-1454.

Dai T, Liu Z P, Gan Q,et al. Thinking on issues of technoeconomic security evaluation. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(12):1448-1454.(in Chinese)

9 渠慎宁,杨丹辉.逆全球化下中美经济脱钩风险的领域与应对策略.财经问题研究, 2021,(7):102-109.

Qu S N, Yang D H. Areas and policy suggestions for risk of economic decoupling between China and US under deglobalization areas and coping strategies. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2021,(7):102-109.(in Chinese)