Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
Keywords
Chinese Academy of Sciences,scientific research institution,budget performance evaluation
Document Type
Theory and Practice of S&T Performance Budgeting Evaluation
Abstract
In accordance with the request of Ministry of Finance, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) conducts a pilot study of comprehensive budget performance evaluation among six affiliated institutes of CAS. The research gives a systematic reviewing analysis from the perspectives of the background of the pilot study, construction of the evaluation logic model, design of the evaluation indicator system, organization and implementation of the whole pilot study, and the resulted effects thereof based on the specific practices. In the meantime, upon exploring of issues, including but not limited to, coordination of all kinds of evaluation work, the uniqueness of science and technology field, and some problems rising in specific practices, the research brings out certain ideas and reflection on budget performance evaluation.
First page
211
Last Page
218
Language
Chinese
Publisher
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
References
1 马国贤, 任晓辉. 全面实施绩效管理:理论、制度与顶层设计. 中国行政管理. 2018, (4):13-18.
Ma G X, Ren X H. Comprehensive implementation of performance management:Theoretical Basis and Institutional Framework. Chinese Public Administration. 2018, (4):13-18. (in Chinese)
2 徐晓阳, 方娅, 汪爱武. 部门整体预算绩效评价体系构建——基于"机构"整体评价视角. 财政监督, 2022, (22):52-57.
Xu X Y, Fang Y, Wang A W. Building of departmental comprehensive budget performance evaluation system—Based on perspective of "agency" comprehensive evaluation. Caizhengjiandu, 2022, (22):52-57. (in Chinese)
3 李晓轩, 徐芳. "四唯"如何破:中国科学院研究所评价的实践和启示. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(12):1431-1438.
Li X X, Xu F. How to break the "Siwei"?-Practice and enlightenment based on research institute evaluation of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(12):1431-1438. (in Chinese)
4 江书军, 陈茜林. 部门整体支出全过程预算绩效管理链条构建研究. 财政监督, 2020, (1):52-56.
Jiang S J, Chen X L. Research on building of departmental comprehensive expenditure whole-process budget performance management chain. Caizhengjiandu, 2020, (1):52-56.
5 许冰兰, 章梓钰. 新时期部门整体预算绩效评价创新研究-以湖北省经济和信息化厅为例. 财政监督, 2022, (15):49-54.
Xu B L, Zhang Z Y. Innovative research on departmental comprehensive budget performance evaluation in new era—Taking department of economy and information technology of Hubei Province as an example. Caizhengjiandu, 2020, (15):49-54. (in Chinese)
6 郑红梅, 申宇冰. 部门整体支出预算绩效评价探索. 山西财税, 2020, (7):44-48.
Zheng H M, Shen Y B. Exploration of departmental comprehensive expenditure budget performance evaluation. Shanxi Finance and Tax, 2020, (7):44-48. (in Chinese)
7 财政部预算司. 中国预算绩效管理探索与实践. 北京:经济科学出版社, 2013.
The Budget Department of Ministry of Finance of People's Republic of China. Exploration and practice of budget performance management in China. Beijing:Economic Science Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
8 Mitchell R, Mayer R, Downhower J. An evaluation of three biome programs. Science, 1976, 192:859-865.
9 Ling J, Hand M. Federal funding in materials research. Science, 1980, 209:1203-1207.
10 Travis J. U.K. university research ranked; funding impacts to follow. Science, 2009, 323:24.
Recommended Citation
TANG, Hao; A, Ruhan; HE, Jun; FENG, Kaiyue; and GAO, Jun
(2023)
"Practice and Thinking of Agency Level Budget Performance Evaluation Pilot in Chinese Academy of Sciences,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 38
:
Iss.
2
, Article 4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230108001
Available at:
https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol38/iss2/4
Included in
Models and Methods Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons