Construct 3E Theory for S&T Budget Performance Evaluation, Improve Effectiveness of S&T Budget

Authors

Ruhan A, Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaFollow
Xiaoxuan LI, Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaFollow

Keywords

S&T, budget performance evaluation,3E theory,effectiveness of science and technology budget

Document Type

Theory and Practice of S&T Performance Budgeting Evaluation

Abstract

The current practices of S&T budget performance evaluation in China put more weight on efficacy than efficiency and effectiveness. This study puts forward an innovative 3E theory in the field of S&T budgeting performance evaluation based on Peter Checkland's 3E evaluation model and the existing practices of S&T budget performance evaluation in China. To unswervingly uphold and approach the new request for improving the S&T input effectiveness emphasized at the 20th National Congress of the CPC, it is a must to carry out a comprehensive S&T budget performance evaluation in the new era on the basis of the 3E theory of S&T budget performance evaluation. Additionally, this research gives detailed analysis on how to do the evaluation based on the 3E theory.

First page

203

Last Page

210

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 Checkland P, Forbes P, Martin S. Techniques in soft systems practice part 3:Monitoring and control in conceptual models and evaluation studies. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 1990, 17:29-37.

2 Liu W B, Cheng Z L, Mingers J, et al. The 3E methodology for developing performance indicators for public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 2010, 30(5):305-312.

3 Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988, 260(12):1743-1748.

4 Mahdinia I, Habibian M. Evaluating the transportation system performance based on efficiency, effectiveness, and efficacy:A case study of the U.S. states//Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washington DC:Transportation Research Board, 2017.

5 Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change:The Stern Review. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2007.

6 蒋锐. 3E与SSM协同分析的人才培养绩效管理模型. 科技通报, 2017, 33(11):271-274.

Jiang R. 3E and SSM collaborative analysis of personnel training performance management model. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2017, 33(11):271-274.

7 郑涌. 预算绩效管理改革这十年. 中国财政, 2022, (20):42-45.

Zheng Y. Budget performance management reform in past ten years. China State Finance, 2022, (20):42-45. (in Chinese)

8 胡志勇, 王泽彩. 预算绩效指标体系构建的标准及其应用. 经济纵横, 2020, (12):92-99 Hu Z Y, Wang Z C. Standard of the design of budget performance evaluation system and its application. Economic Review Journal, 2020, (12):92-99. (in Chinese)

9 阿儒涵, 程燕林, 李晓轩, 等. 关于财政绩效评价综合打分制方法的思考. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(12):1439-1447.

Aruhan, Cheng Y L, Li X X, et al. Thoughts on comprehensive scoring method in fiscal performance evaluation. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(12):1439-1447. (in Chinese)

10 徐芳, 李晓轩. 科技评价改革十年评述. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5):603-612.

Xu F, Li X X. Review on reform of research evaluation in past decade. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5):603-612. (in Chinese)

11 Brown N, Glass C, Simmonds P, et al. Socio-economic Impact Evaluation Study of the UK Subscription to ESO. Brighton:Technopolis Group, 2022.

12 赵路, 程瑜, 张琦. 发挥财政职能作用支持科技创新发展——财政科技事业10年回顾与展望. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5):596-602.

Zhao L, Cheng Y, Zhang Q. Research on financial support for scientific and technological innovation-Review and prospect of development of financial science and technology in past ten years. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5):596-602. (in Chinese)

13 曹堂哲, 李方旺. 基于预算绩效的政府战略性绩效管理新形态——问题、逻辑与实施路径. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 47(5):61-70.

Cao T Z, Li F W. A new form of government strategic performance management based on budget performance:Problem, logic and implementation approaches. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences), 2019, 47(5):61-70. (in Chinese)

14 陈捷, 曲静, 娄智勇, 等. 生物学特征、趋势及对策研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(3):308-316.

Chen J, Qu J, Lou Z Y, et al. Research on characteristics, development trend and funding countermeasures of biology. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(3):308-316. (in Chinese)

15 杨国梁, 肖小溪, 李晓轩. 美国STAR METRICS项目及其对我国科技评价的启示. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(12):12-17.

Yang G L, Xiao X X, Li X X. STAR METRICS project in U.S. and its enlightment to S&T evaluation in China. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2011, 32(12):12-17. (in Chinese)

16 徐芳, 刘文斌, 李晓轩. 英国REF科研影响力评价的方法及启示. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, 35(7):9-15.

Xu F, Liu W B, Li X X. Research impact evaluation within UK REF and its implications. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2014, 35(7):9-15. (in Chinese)

Recommended Citation

A, Ruhan and LI, Xiaoxuan (2023) "Construct 3E Theory for S&T Budget Performance Evaluation, Improve Effectiveness of S&T Budget," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 38 : Iss. 2 , Article 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230106002
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol38/iss2/3