Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
Keywords
middle-technology trap, pure basic research, high-quality development, innovation-driven, three-pronged new development model, scientific population
Document Type
Avoid Middle-technology Trap and Achieve Chinese Path to Modernization
Abstract
A major pillar of the new innovation-driven three-pronged development model is pure basic research. With the development of an innovation-driven economy, pure basic research has become increasingly important in promoting scientific and technological progress. In the past few decades, China has made a lot of progress in pure basic research. However, in the new three-pronged development model consisting of the pure basic research system, the applied technology system and the financial support system, pure basic research is generally where China’s weakness lies. This study proposes that in order to comprehensively improve China’s pure basic research capabilities, we must first clarify some misunderstandings, and then find the fundamental reasons why China’s pure basic research is relatively weak, and on this basis, formulate strategies for improving pure basic research. China’s pure basic research is indeed relatively weak compared to the advanced level in the world, but China’s relatively backward pure basic research is not directly related to the problem of the so-called being taken by the throat. The main reason for being taken by the throat is that China’s technology level is not good enough due to insufficient accumulation of tacit knowledge and investment in research and development in applied technology. This study argues that China has not yet begun to make efforts in developing pure basic research in a real sense, which is the fundamental reason why China’s pure basic research is relatively backward. Precisely because China has not yet begun to exert its efforts in pure basic research, China’s potential in this area is huge. As China’s comprehensive national strength rises, it is a wise move to gradually increase investment in pure basic research, which is in line with the long-term interests of China and mankind. This study points out that the key strategy for improving China’s pure basic research is to enlarge the scientific population and make full use of their talents. Based on this idea, this study discusses specific strategies to improve the education system, the management system and soft infrastructure, in order to fundamentally improve the level of pure basic research in China.
First page
1627
Last Page
1634
Language
Chinese
Publisher
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
References
1 郑永年. 中国跨越“中等技术陷阱”的策略研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(11): 1579-1592. Zheng Y N. How can China avoid the middle-technology trap?. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(11): 1579-1592. (in Chinese)
2 Kaldewey D, Schauz D. Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Berghahn Books, 2018.
3 Allen F. Secret Formula: The Inside Story of How Coca-Cola Became the Best-Known Brand in the World. New York: Open Road Integrated Media, 2015.
4 Nonaka I, Teece D J. Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization. London; Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2001.
5 原帅, 何洁, 贺飞. 世界主要国家近十年科技研发投入产出对比分析. 科技导报, 2020, 38(19): 58-67. Yuan S, He J, He F. An international comparison of R&D input and output in major countries in the past decade. Science & Technology Review, 2020, 38(19): 58-67. (in Chinese)
6 Epstein I. Chinese Education: Problems, Policies, and Prospects. London: Routledge, 2018.
7 Watkins J W N. Science and Scepticism. Course Book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.
8 Russell B. Principles of Mathematics. London: Routledge, 2010.
Recommended Citation
YUAN, Randong
(2023)
"How to improve pure basic research system in China?,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 38
:
Iss.
11
, Article 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230813002
Available at:
https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol38/iss11/5
Included in
Development Studies Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons