self-reliance in science and technology; national science and technology plan; major national science and technology programs; subject selection
Strategy & Policy Decision Research
The "selection of subject" of science and technology programs is the start of scientific research, and the quality of the selected subjects determines the quality of innovation to a large extent. Major national science and technology programs, as the core carriers of science and technology innovation activities, bear the mission of national science and technology innovation. Optimizing the organizational management of major science and technology programs is a major task for deepening the reform of the science and technology system in the new era. This study, from the perspective of realizing high-level self-reliance in science and technology, expounds the composition of national science and technology plans and major science and technology programs and models of selecting subjects for different types of major national science and technology programs, analyzes the experience of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in selecting subjects for major research projects, and shares some thoughts and suggestions such as adopting differentiated subject selection mechanisms based on the research nature of major science and technology programs, introducing a "demand check" mechanism for the subject selection of exploratory technology R&D and strategic technology R&D projects and a "three-point review" on the subject selection of strategic basic research and strategic technology R&D.
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦, 利奥波德·英费尔德. 物理学的进化. 周肇威, 译. 北京:中信出版社, 2019:71.
Einstein A, Infeld L. The Evolution of Physics. Translated by Zhou Z W. Beijing:CITIC Press Group, 2019:71. (in Chinese)
2 习近平. 加快建设科技强国实现高水平科技自立自强. 求是, 2022, (9):44-49.
Xi J P. Making accelerated efforts in building China into a leader in science and technology and achieving sci-tech selfreliance and self-strengthening at higher levels. Qiu Shi, 2022, (9):44-49. (in Chinese)
3 曹伟. 诺贝尔科学奖成果的方法论研究. 北京:科学出版社, 2014:40-41.
Cao W. Methodology Research on the Achievements of Nobel Prize in Science. Beijing:Science Press, 2014:40-41. (in Chinese)
4 Stokes D E. Pasteur's Quadrant:Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC:Brookings Institution Press, 1997.
5 徐示波, 贾敬敦, 仲伟. 国家战略科技力量体系化研究. 中国科技论坛, 2022, (3):1-8.
Xu S B, Jia J D, Zhong W. Research on the systematization of national strategic and technological forces. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2022, (3):1-8. (in Chinese)
6 陈劲, 朱子钦. 未来产业:引领创新的战略布局. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2022:38-39.
Chen J, Zhu Z Q. The Industries of the Future:Strategic Blueprint for Driving Innovations. Beijing:China Machine Press. 2022:38-39. (in Chinese)
7 Rothwell R. Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 1994, 11(1):7-31.
8 国家创新生态系统研究课题组. 国家创新生态系统研究报告. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 2015:7.
The Research Group of China's National Innovation Ecosystem. A Research Report on China's National Innovation Ecosystem. Beijing:Science and Technology of China Press, 2015:7. (in Chinese)
9 徐匡迪. 对颠覆性创新意愿应宽容支持. 文汇报, 2016-08- 17(01). Xu K D. Be more tolerant and supportive to the aspiration of disruptive innovations. Wenhui Daily, 2016-08-17(01). (in Chinese)
10 李言荣, 陈彬. 提出真问题比热衷"填补空白"更重要. 中国科学报, 2022-03-16(01). Li Y R, Chen B. It is more important to raise a real question than to high on filling in gaps. China Science Daily, 2022-03- 16(01). (in Chinese)
11 杨琨. 科研项目组织管理改革亟待深化. 光明日报, 2022- 04-07(16). Yang K. Organization and management reform of scientific research projects need to be deepened urgently. Guangming Daily, 2022-04-07(16). (in Chinese)
12 袁亚湘. 建设科技强国必须真正重视基础研究. 人民政协报, 2022-03-22(03). Yuan Y X. Basic researches must be truly highlighted to build a leading power in science and technology. Journal of the CPPCC, 2022-03-22(03). (in Chinese)
13 李元龙. DARPA的创新特点及启示. 科技导报, 2018, 36(4):22-25.
Li Y L. DARPA and innovations. Science & Technology Review, 2018, 36(4):22-25. (in Chinese)
14 张九庆. DARPA模式在美国政府中的推广及其启示. 科技中国, 2021, (8):53-58.
Zhang J Q. The Promotion of the DARPA model in the American government and its inspirations. Science and Technology of China, 2021, (8):53-58. (in Chinese)
15 李其飞. DARPA:感知未来世界军民高新技术. 国防科技工业, 2015, (2):57-59.
Li Q F. DARPA:A perception of future high and new military and civilian technologies in the world. Defence Science & Technology Industry, 2015, (2):57-59. (in Chinese)
16 庞立艳. 美国DARPA项目决策经验对我国加速基础研究产出和转化的启示.世界科技研究与发展, 2021, 44(4):578-586.
Pang L Y. The inspiration of the U.S. experience in DARPA project decision on China's accelerated basic research output and transformation. World Sci-Tech R & D, 2021, 44(4):578- 586. (in Chinese)
17 郝君超, 王海燕, 李哲. DARPA科研项目组织模式及其对中国的启示. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(9):6-9.
Hao J C, Wang H Y, Li Z. DARPA scientific research project organization model and its inspiration on China. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2015, 32(9):6-9. (in Chinese)
18 沙龙·温伯格. 战争狂想者——揭秘美国国防部高级研究计划局. 陈向阳, 译. 北京:新华出版社, 2019:8.
Weinberger S. The Imagineers of War:The Untold Story of DARPA. Translated by Chen X Y. Beijing:Xinhua Publishing House, 2019:8. (in Chinese)
19 应益昕, 郭明, 王晔博, 等. 发达国家重大创新方向遴选决策方式及其启示. 中国科技资源导刊, 2022, 54(2):22-26.
Ying Y X, Guo M, Wang Y B, et al. Decision-making approaches to selection of major innovations in developed countries and their inspirations. China Science & Technology Resources Review, 2022, 54(2):22-26. (in Chinese)
JIA, Baoyu; YANG, Ming; and YING, Yan
"Subject Selection Mechanism of Major Science and Technology Programs from Perspective of High-level Self-reliance in Science and Technology,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 37
, Article 5.
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol37/iss9/5