•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

digital economy, high-quality development, monitoring and evaluation, statistical accounting, indicator system

Document Type

Policy & Management Research

Abstract

The digital economy has become the core force in leading economic development and building a new international pattern, and it is the key to achieving high-quality development. How to monitor and evaluate the development level of the digital economy has become an important issue in formulating industrial and regulatory policies for the digital economy reasonably, ensuring the healthy and orderly development of the digital economy, and thus stabilizing the national economic development. The value-added-based statistical system, which was born from the industrial economy, is constrained by data and methods, so it is difficult to accurately measure the level of development of digital economy and effectively measure the social value brought by the development of digital economy. Based on the current situation of China's digital economy development and systematic review of the theoretical basis and current methods of digital economy evaluation, this study combines the development law of digital economy and the target of China's digital economy development, shifts the evaluation orientation from the perspective of "GDP only" to the perspective of high-quality development, and systematically builds a monitoring and evaluation indicator system that takes into account statistical scientificity, regional comparability, data continuity and evaluation operability. This study also combines the monitoring and evaluation system with the practice of Beijing's global digital economy benchmark city construction, monitors and evaluates the digital economy based on high-quality development oriented to the development needs of Beijing's digital economy. This is a useful exploration on how to monitor and evaluate the digital economy, and provides a reference for how the country and regions can grasp the law of digital economy development and build a digital economy monitoring and evaluation system according to local conditions.

First page

812

Last Page

824

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 International Monetary Fund. Measuring the Digital Economy. Washington DC:IMF, 2018.

2 蔡跃洲, 陈楠. 新技术革命下人工智能与高质量增长、高质量就业. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(5):3-22.

Cai Y Z, Chen N. Artificial intelligence and high-quality growth and employment in the era of new technological revolution. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2019, 36(5):3-22. (in Chinese)

3 European Commission. Digital Economy and Society Index 2021.

Brussels:European Commission, 2021.

4 International Telecommunication Union. Measuring the Information Society Report. Geneva:ITU Publications, 2018.

5 Baller S, Dutta S, Lanvin B. The global information technology report 2016-innovating in the digital economy. Geneva:World Economic Forum, 2016.

6 Yoo Y, Bryant A, Wigand R T. Designing digital communities that transform urban life:Introduction to the special section on digital cities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2010. 27(33):637-640.

7 Bureau of Economic Analysis. Defining and measuring the digital economy. (2018-03-15)[2022-05-20] https://www.bea. gov/sites/default/files/papers/defining-and-measuring-thedigital-economy.pdf.

8 国家统计局. 数字经济及其核心产业统计分类(2021). (2021-05-27)[2022-05-19]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/202106/t20210603_1818134.html. National Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Classification of the Digital Economy and its Core Industries (2021). (2021-05- 27)[2022-05-19]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/202106/t20210603_1818134.html. (in Chinese)

9 Coyle D. Do-it-yourself digital:The production boundary, the productivity puzzle and economic welfare. Economica, 2019, 86:750-774.

10 许宪春, 张美慧, 张钟文. 数字化转型与经济社会统计的挑战和创新. 统计研究, 2021, 38(1):15-26.

Xu X C, Zhang M H, Zhang Z W. Challenges and innovations of economic and social statistics in the face of digital transformation. Statistical Research, 2021, 38(1):15-26. (in Chinese)

11 中国信息通信研究院. 中国数字经济发展白皮书(2017 年). 北京:中国信息通信研究院, 2017.

China Academy of Information and Communication Technology. White Paper on the Development of China's Digital Economy (2017). Beijing:China Academy of Information and Communication Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)

12 中国信息化百人会. 中国信息经济发展报告(2016年). 北京:中国信息化百人会, 2016.

China Informatization Committee of 100.

China Information Economy Development Report (2016). Beijing:China Informatization Committee of 100, 2016. (in Chinese)

13 蔡跃洲, 牛新星. 中国数字经济增加值规模测算及结构分析. 中国社会科学, 2021, (11):4-30.

Cai Y Z, Niu X X. Scale measurement and structural analysis of the value-added of China's digital economy. Social Sciences in China, 2021, (11):4-30. (in Chinese)

14 中国信息通信研究院. 中国数字经济发展白皮书(2020 年). 北京:中国信息通信研究院, 2020.

China Academy of Information and Communication Technology. White Paper on the Development of China's Digital Economy (2020). Beijing:China Academy of Information and Communication Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)

15 蔡跃洲, 张钧南. 信息通信技术对中国经济增长的替代效应与渗透效应. 经济研究, 2015, 50(12):100-114.

Cai Y Z, Zhang J N. The substitution and pervasiveness effects of ICT on China's economic growth. Economic Research Journal, 2015, 50(12):100-114. (in Chinese)

16 Solow R M. We'd better watch out. New York Times, 1987- 06-12(36).

17 Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. The Second Machine Age:Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies.New York:WW Norton & Company Press, 2014.

18 Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C. Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox:A Clash of Expectations and Statistics. Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017.

19 Brynjolfsson E, Eggers F, Gannamaneni A. Measuring welfare with massive online choice experiments:A brief introduction. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2018, 108:473-476.

20 Hulten C, Nakamura L. Accounting for Growth in the Age of the Internet:The Importance of Output-Saving Technical Change. Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017.

21 张勋, 万广华, 张佳佳, 等. 数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长. 经济研究, 2019, 54(8):71-86.

Zhang X, Wan G H, Zhang J J, et al. Digital economy, financial inclusion, and inclusive growth. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(8):71-86. (in Chinese)

22 傅秋子, 黄益平. 数字金融对农村金融需求的异质性影响——来自中国家庭金融调查与北京大学数字普惠金融指数的证据. 金融研究, 2018, (11):68-84.

Fu Q Z, Huang Y P. Digital finance's heterogeneous effects on rural financial demand:Evidence from China household finance survey and inclusive digital finance index. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, (11):68-84. (in Chinese)

23 王文. 数字经济时代下工业智能化促进了高质量就业吗. 经济学家, 2020, (4):89-98.

Wang W. Does industrial intelligence promote high-quality employment in the digital economy era. Economist, 2020, (4):89-98. (in Chinese)

24 柏培文, 张云. 数字经济、人口红利下降与中低技能劳动者权益. 经济研究, 2021, 56(5):91-108.

Bai P W, Zhang Y. Digital economy, declining demographic dividends and the rights and interests of low- and mediumskilled labor. Economic Research Journal, 2021, 56(5):91- 108. (in Chinese)

25 夏炎, 王会娟, 张凤, 等. 数字经济对中国经济增长和非农就业影响研究——基于投入占用产出模型. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(7):707-716.

Xia Y, Wang H J, Zhang F, et al. Impact of digital economy on China's economic and non-agricultural employment- Based on input-occupancy-output model. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(7):707-716. (in Chinese)

26 赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据. 管理世界, 2020, 36(10):65-76.

Z h a o T, Z h a n g Z, L i a n g S K. D i g i t a l e c o n o m y, entrepreneurship and high-quality economic development:Empirical evidence from urban China. Management World, 2020, 36(10):65-76. (in Chinese)

27 European Commission. European Innovation Scoreboard 2020-Methodology Report. Brussels:European Commission, 2020.

28 OECD. Measuring the Digital Economy:A New Perspective. Paris:OECD Publishing, 2014.

29 ITU-T. Key performance Indicators Related to the Use of Information and Communication Technology in Smart Sustainable Cities. Geneva:ITU-T, 2016.

30 Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations. E-Government Survey 2020-Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development. New York:United Nations, 2020.

31 BSA. The BSA Framework for Secure Software. Washington DC:BSA, 2020.

32 金碚. 关于"高质量发展"的经济学研究. 中国工业经济, 2018, (4):5-18.

Jin B. Study on the "high-quality development" economics. China Industrial Economics, 2018, (4):5-18. (in Chinese)

33 任保平. 新时代中国经济从高速增长转向高质量发展:理论阐释与实践取向. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(3):66-74.

Ren B P. Theoretical interpretation and practical orientation of China's economy from high speed growth to high quality development in new era. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(3):66- 74. (in Chinese)

34 Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Research commentary- Digital infrastructures:The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4):748-759.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS