Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


basic research, Think Tank Double Helix Methodology, discipline layout, task layout

Document Type

Application and Empirical Analysis of Think Tank Double Helix Methodology


The layout of basic research is a typical multi-stakeholder and multi-disciplinary comprehensive policy research, which is suitable to be guided by the think tank double helix methodology. Firstly, the study summarizes the "organization" and theoretical understanding of basic research layout. Secondly, based on MIPS logical hierarchy method and DIIS process fusion method, the study analyzes the fusion mechanism of "discipline layout" and "task layout" of basic research. Finally, the study puts forward the promotion strategies and measures of the future basic research layout from four aspects:system layout, discipline layout, task layout, and international layout.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


1 潘教峰. 智库研究的双螺旋结构. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(7):907-916.

Pan J F. Double helix structure of think tank research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(7):907-916. (in Chinese)

2 钱学森. 论技术科学. 科学通报, 1957, 8(3):97-104.

Qian X S. About Technological Science. Science Bulletin, 1957, 8(3):97-104. (in Chinese)

3 钱学森. 技术科学中的方法论问题. 自然辩证法研究通讯, 1957, (1):33-34.

Qian X S. Methodological Issues in Technological Science. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1957, (1):33-34. (in Chinese)

4 潘教峰, 鲁晓, 王光辉. 科学研究模式变迁:有组织的基础研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12):1395-1403.

Pan J F, Lu X, Wang G H. Transforming scientific research: Organized basic research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12):1395-1403. (in Chinese)

5 杜鹏, 沈华, 张凤. 对科学研究的新认识. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12):1413-1418.

Du P, Shen H, Zhang F. New understanding on scientific research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12):1413-1418. (in Chinese)

6 万劲波, 张凤, 潘教峰. 开展"有组织的基础研究":任务布局与战略科技力量. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12): 1404-1412.

Wan J B, Zhang F, Pan J F. Promoting organized basic research:Strategic layout and strategic capacity in science and technology. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12):1404-1412. (in Chinese)

7 王孜丹, 杜鹏. 学科布局的逻辑内涵及中国实践. 科技导报, 2021, 39(3):123-129.

Wang Z D, Du P. The logical connotation of discipline layout and Chinese practice. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(3):123-129. (in Chinese)

8 付邦红. 科学可以计划吗?——20世纪三四十年代以英国为中心的争论. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(7):961-975.

Fu B H Can science be planned? the controversy centering on Britain in the 1930s and 1940s. Studies in Science of Science, 2012, 30(7):961-975. (in Chinese)

9 田贤鹏, 徐林. 面向高等教育强国的前沿学科布局:战略图景与政策取向. 重庆高教研究, 2022, 10(1):21-33.

Tian X P, Xu L. Layout of frontier disciplines facing the powerful country of higher education:Strategic picture and policy orientation. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2022, 10(1):21-33. (in Chinese)

10 王孜丹, 孙粒, 杜鹏. 学科布局的思路与出路——基于"卡脖子"问题的若干思考. 科学与社会, 2020, 10(4):25-34.

Wang Z D, Sun L, Du P. The Thought and way out of discipline layout:Some viewpoints based on "neck jamming" problem. Science and Society, 2020, 10(4):25-34. (in Chinese)

11 王孜丹, 赵超, 张理茜, 等. 优化自然科学基金学科布局的改革逻辑与路径选择. 中国科学基金, 2019, 33(5):440- 445.

Wang Z D, Zhao C, Zhang L Q, et al. Reform logic and path choice for optimizing the discipline layout of science funds. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2019, 33(5):440-445. (in Chinese)