•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

original basic research; original exploratory program; connotation analysis; funding orientation

Document Type

Policy & Management Research

Abstract

Original basic research is a key driving force for the development of science and technology, as well as the source of the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation. To further encourage and support originality and innovation, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) implemented the original exploratory program as one of its priorities for deepening reform. In this paper, the concept and characteristics of original basic research are analyzed, and the funding orientation of foreign major science funding agencies on original basic research projects is investigated. This study further discusses the connotation and positioning of the original basic research, and puts forward specific suggestions for promoting the discovery and identification of original ideas and optimizing the application and review management of the original exploratory program.

First page

384

Last Page

394

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 李静海. 抓住机遇推进基础研究高质量发展. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(5):586-596. Li J H. Seize opportunity to promote high quality development of basic research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(5):586-596. (in Chinese) 2 Gravem S A, Bachhuber S M, Fulton-Bennett H K, et al. Transformative research is not easily predicted. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 32(11):825-834. 3 Wuestman M, Hoekman J, Frenken K. A typology of scientific breakthroughs. Quantitative Science Studies, 2020, 1(3):1203-1222. 4 Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Original Edition). Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1962. 5 于绥生. 论基础研究原始创新的特点. 技术与创新管理, 2017, 38(4):354-360. Yu S S. The characteristics of original innovation in fundamental research. Technology and Innovation Management, 2017, 38(4):354-360. (in Chinese) 6 韩宇, 赵学文, 李正风. 基础研究创新概念辨析及对相关问题的思考. 中国基础科学, 2001, 3(3):33-38. Han Y, Zhao X W, Li Z F. Conceptual discrimination and thinking on basic research innovation. China Basic Science,2001, 3(3):33-38. (in Chinese) 7 Andersen H, Barker P, Chen X. The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2006. 8 陈雅兰. 原始性创新的理论与实证研究. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2005. Chen Y L. The Theoretical and Empirical Research of Original Innovation. Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology, 2005. (in Chinese) 9 Hinrichs M M, Seager T P, Tracy S J, et al. Innovation in the Knowledge Age:Implications for collaborative science. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2017, 37(2):144-155. 10 Grumet G W. Insubordination and genius:Galileo, Darwin, Pasteur, Einstein, and Pauling. Psychological Reports, 2008, 102(3):819-847. 11 Koshland D E Jr. The Cha-Cha-Cha theory of scientific discovery. Science, 2007, 317:761-762 12 谷瑞升. 浅议国家自然科学基金生命科学领域"鼓励探索、突出原创"类项目资助导向. 中国科学基金, 2021, 35(4):600-603. Gu R S. A remark on the funding orientation of "exploration and originality" in life sciences of national natural science foundation of China. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2021, 35(4):600-603. (in Chinese) 13 许海云, 刘亚辉, 罗瑞. 突破性科学创新早期识别研究综述. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(4):198-205. Xu H Y, Liu Y H, Luo R. A review on early identification of science breakthrough. Information Studies:Theory & Application, 2021, 44(4):198-205. (in Chinese) 14 杜建, 孙轶楠, 张阳, 等. 变革性研究的科学计量学特征与早期识别方法. 中国科学基金, 2019, 33(1):88-98. Du J, Sun Y N, Zhang Y, et al. Characterizing and detecting the early scientometric signs of the potential transformative research. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2019, 33(1):88-98. (in Chinese) 15 吴海江. 诺贝尔奖:原创性与科学积累. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2002, 23(11):28-31. Wu H J. The Nobel Prize:Originality and scientific accumulation. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2002, 23(11):28-31. (in Chinese) 16 杨文采. 谈科学知识发现和创新的轨迹. 科技导报, 2015, 33(16):12. Yang W C. On the track of scientific knowledge discovery and innovation. Science & Technology Review, 2015, 33(16):12. (in Chinese) 17 叶鑫生. 源头创新小议. 中国科学基金, 2001, 15(2):113-114. Ye X S. On original innovation. Bulletin of National Science Foundation of China, 2001, 15(2):113-114. (in Chinese) 18 Fang H. An explanation of resisted discoveries based on construal-level theory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2015, 21(1):41-50. 19 Li J, Shi D, Zhao S X, et al. A study of the "heartbeat spectra" for "sleeping beauties". Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3):493-502. 20 杜鹏, 沈华, 张凤. 对科学研究的新认识. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12):1413-1418. Du P, Shen H, Zhang F. New understanding on scientific research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12):1413-1418. (in Chinese) 21 汪寿阳, 陶睿, 王珏. 优化科学基金资助政策,助力基础研究高质量发展. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12):1434-1440. Wang S Y, Tao R, Wang J. Optimization of funding policies of science foundation of China for high-quality development of basic research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12):1434-1440. (in Chinese) 22 杨芳娟, 梁正, 薛澜, 等. 颠覆性技术创新项目的组织实施与管理——基于DARPA的分析. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(8):1442-1451. Yang F J, Liang Z, Xue L, et al. Research on the implementation and management of disruptive technological innovation project:based on the analysis of DARPA. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(8):1442-1451. (in Chinese) 23 窦超, 代涛, 李晓轩, 等. DARPA颠覆性技术创新机制研究——基于SNM理论的视角. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(6):99-108. Dou C, Dai T, Li X X, et al. Research on DARPA's disruptive technological innovation mechanism:Based on the perspective of SNM theory. Science of Science and Management of S& T, 2018, 39(6):99-108. (in Chinese) 24 樊春良, 钱进. 美国ARPA-E是如何支持变革性技术发展的. 创新科技, 2021, 21(4):35-48. Fan C L, Qian J. How does ARPA-E support the development of transformative technologies. Innovation Science and Technology, 2021, 21(4):35-48. (in Chinese) 25 彭春燕. 日本设立颠覆性技术创新计划探索科技计划管理改革. 中国科技论坛, 2015, (4):141-147. Peng C Y. On implementation mechanism of Japan's ImPACT program. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2015, (4):141-147. (in Chinese) 26 刘如. 美国DARPA牵引高新技术创新发展的经验及启示. 科技中国, 2021, (2):20-25. Liu R. The experience and enlightenment of American DARPA's traction of high-tech innovation development. Science and Technology in China, 2021, (2):20-25. (in Chinese) 27 陈伟. 美国先进能源研究计划署管理创新研究及对我国的启示. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(11):20-33. Chen W. Research on advanced research projects agency:Energy management innovation in the United States and its implications for China. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2016, 37(11):20-33. (in Chinese) 28 潜旭明. 美国新能源创新的强力引擎——美国能源部 ARPA-E透析. 中国战略新兴产业, 2014, (22):82-83. Qian X M. The powerful engine of new energy innovation in the United States-The U.S. Department of Energy ARPA-E dialysis. China Strategic Emerging Industry, 2014, (22):82-83. (in Chinese) 29 Collins F S, Schwetz T A, Tabak L A, et al. ARPA-H:Accelerating biomedical breakthroughs. Science, 2021, 373:165-167. 30 潘教峰, 杜鹏. 夯实科技强国建设的知识基础. 中国科学报, 2021-11-22(01). Pan J F, Du P. Strengthening the knowledge foundation of the construction of science and technology power. Chinese Journal of Science, 2021-11-22(01). (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS