•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

natural science, social science, integration, new think tank, science of think tank

Document Type

Think Tank Research

Abstract

The relationship between natural science and social science has experienced convergence, separation, and convergence again, shows a trend of accelerated integration under the background of modernization. The genes of new think tanks come from the two sources, i.e., natural science and social science, which is the demand for decision-making consultation that put forward by modernization construction. The only way to develop the new think tank of high quality is to establish the organizational leadership and policy traction system of think tanks that integrate natural science and social science, the internal and external coordination system of think tank research, the scientific construction and personnel training system of think tanks, the decision-making consultation service and achievement evaluation system, and the driving system that complements the national strategic scientific and technological forces and the national strategic ideological forces. Promoting the formation of a strong reality orientation is the road must follow for the high quality development of new think tank, and so as for the new think tank to strengthen the national strategic thinking force and promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity.

First page

168

Last Page

176

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 孙小礼. 交叉科学时代与自然科学和社会科学的联盟. 哲学研究, 1991, (3):16-19. Sun X L. Cross science era and the alliance of natural and social sciences. Philosophical Researche, 1991, (3):16-19. (in Chinese) 2 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷). 北京:人民出版社, 1979:128. Marx K, Engels F. Complete Works of Marx and Engels (Volume 42). Beijing:People's Publishing House, 1979:128.(in Chinese) 3 列宁. 列宁全集(第25卷). 北京:人民出版社, 1959:43. Lenin V I U. Complete Works of Lenin (Volume 25). Beijing:People's Publishing House, 1959:43. (in Chinese) 4 张新科. 世界科学中心形成的哲学社会科学之基. 中国社会科学报, 2021-06-18(06). Zhang X K.The foundation of philosophy and social science for the formation of the world science center. China Social Science Today, 2021-06-18(06). (in Chinese) 5 白春礼. 架构科学家与哲学家的思想桥梁,为人类科技事业贡献新智慧. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(1):3-9. Bai C L. Building brain-bridge between scientists and philosophers, contributing new wisdom to science and technology development. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(1):3-9. (in Chinese) 6 习近平. 努力成为世界主要科学中心和创新高地. 求是, 2021, (6):4-11. Xi J P. Strive to become the world's leading scientific center and innovation hub. QUISHI, 2021, (6):4-11. (in Chinese) 7 杨斌. 新时代更要重视人文红利. 瞭望, 2018, (19):64. Yang B. The new era should pay more attention to cultural dividend. Outlook Weekly, 2018, (19):64. (in Chinese) 8 南京大学中国智库研究与评价中心、光明日报智库研究与发布中心联合课题组. "数"说成长为中国智库画张像——以中国智库索引CTTI来源智库为样本. 光明日报, 2020-12-28(16). Joint research group of China Think Tank Research and Evaluation Center, Nanjing University, Guangming Daily Think Tank Research and Publication Center. The theory of "numbers" has grown into a picture of Chinese think tanks-A sample of Chinese think tank index CTTI source think tanks. Guangming Daily, 2020-12-28(16). (in Chinese) 9 芮雯奕. 美国麻省理工学院科技智库建设特点及启示. 智库理论与实践, 2016, 1(2):114-118. Rui W Y. Operation characteristics of Massachusetts Institute of technology and its enlightenment on the construction of Chinese scientific and technical think tanks. Think Tank:Theory & Practice, 2016, 1(2):114-118. (in Chinese) 10 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发《关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见》. 中华人民共和国国务院公报, 2015, (4):4-8. General Offices of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council issued opinions on Strengthening the Construction of New Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristics. Bulletin of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, 2015, (4):4-8. (in Chinese) 11 潘教峰, 张凤, 鲁晓. 促进智库研究的"六个转变". 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(10):1226-1234. Pan J F, Zhang F, Lu X. Promoting "six transitions" in think tank research. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(10):1226-1234. (in Chinese) 12 陆大道. 陆大道院士访谈:关于加强智库建设的认识与建议. 中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(8):913-917. Lu D D. Interview with Academician Lu Dadao. Understanding and suggestions on strengthening the construction of think tank. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016, 31(8):913-917. (in Chinese) 13 刘西忠. 新型智库质量提升与国家治理现代化. 南京:江苏人民出版社, 2021:363-364. Liu X Z. Quality Improvement of New Think Tanks and Modernization of National Governance. Nanjing:Jiangsu People's Publishing House, 2021:363-364. (in Chinese) 14 王鑫, 张慧琴, 孙昌璞. 从智库研究到智库科学. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(7):797-806. Wang X, Zhang H Q, Sun C P. From Strategy Consulting Research to Science of Think Tank. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(7):797-806. (in Chinese) 15 贾宝余. 优化科技决策咨询制度. 学习时报, 2017-04-10(03). Jia B Y. Optimization of scientific and technological decision consultation system. Study Times, 2017-04-10(03). (in Chinese) 16 陈先达. 哲学社会科学的作用和学者的责任. 中国社会科学, 2004, (4):4-12. Chen X D. Roles of Philosophy and Social Science and Responsibilities of Scholars. Social Sciences in China, 2004, (4):4-12. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS