Study on Pattern and Types of Technological Innovation Efficiency of Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China

Authors

Dan CUI, Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, ChinaFollow
Guoping LI, School of Government, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaFollow

Keywords

innovation chain; patent technology innovation efficiency; industrial technological innovation efficiency; three urban agglomerations; China

Document Type

Regional Innovation in China under Double Cycle Pattern

Abstract

From the perspective of patent industry innovation chain, this paper analyzed the regional differences of the patent technology innovation efficiency and industrial technology innovation efficiency in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, as well as the spatial patterns and industrial characteristics of cities with various types of technological innovation efficiency. It is found that there are significant differences in patent and industrial technology innovation efficiency among the three urban agglomerations. The patent technology innovation efficiency in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration is relatively high, while that in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations is relatively low. Cities with high industrial technological innovation efficiency show a continuous distribution around Beijing and Tianjin in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, a central periphery structure in the Yangtze River Delta, and a centripetal distribution in the Pearl River Delta. More than 50% of the listed high-tech enterprises in cities with high industrial technological innovation efficiency are strategic emerging industry enterprises. Most of the cities with low industrial technological innovation efficiency are located far away from the provincial capital cities and municipalities directly under the central government, and the number of listed high-tech enterprises in most cities is small. In view of the present situation of technological innovation efficiency of the three major urban agglomerations, this paper puts forward different innovation development strategies.

First page

1783

Last Page

1795

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 管理科学技术名词审定委员会. 管理科学技术名词. 北京:科学出版社, 2016. Committee for Terminology in Management Science and Technology. Chinese Terms in Management Science and Technology. Beijing:Science Press, 2006. (in Chinese)

2 李雨晨, 陈凯华. 面向创新链的国家创新力测度体系构建研究——多维创新指数的视角. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(11):45-57. Li Y, Chen K. The innovation chain-oriented construction of national innovation force measurement system-The perspective of multidimensional innovation index. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2019, 40(11):45-57. (in Chinese)

3 CB Insights. 2021年全球独角兽公司研究报告. (2021-09-30)[2022-11-28]. https://www.waitang.com/report/37750.html. CB Insights. Global unicorn company research report in 2021. (2021-09-30)[2022-11-28]. https://www.waitang.com/report/37750.html. (in Chinese)

4 徐杰, 朱承亮. 资源环境约束下少数民族地区经济增长效率研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2018, (11):95-110. Xu J, Zhu C L. A study on economic growth efficiency under resources and environment constraints in ethnic minority regions. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2018, (11):95-110. (in Chinese)

5 Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 1994, (84):66-83.

6 李国平, 崔丹. 我国城市群人口和经济承载力及其提升策略. 改革, 2022, (7):37-48. Li G P, Cui D. Population and economic carrying capacity of urban agglomeration in China and its promotion strategies. Reform, 2022, (7):37-48. (in Chinese)

Recommended Citation

CUI, Dan and LI, Guoping (2022) "Study on Pattern and Types of Technological Innovation Efficiency of Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 37 : Iss. 12 , Article 12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220831002
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol37/iss12/12