Comparative Study and Suggestions on International Digital Governance Pattern among China, United States and European Union

Authors

Yunjie ZHANG, Department of Sociology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Center for Sociological Research and Development Studies of China, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaFollow
Liyuan FENG, Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Zheng LI, Department of Sociology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Center for Sociological Research and Development Studies of China, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Qiuyuan AI, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Zeqi QIU, Department of Sociology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Center for Sociological Research and Development Studies of China, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Center for Digital Governance Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaFollow

Keywords

digital governance pattern, trade networks, digital trade agreements

Document Type

Consultation of Academic Divisions and Suggestion of Academicians: Comparative Study on Digital Governance Pattern among China, United States, and European Union

Abstract

Digital technology and digital economy have increasingly become important indicators for the competitiveness of various economies. In order to vie for digital competitive advantages and seize the advantageous ecological niches in the international digital ecological development, major economies such as China, the United States, and European Union have launched extensive competition. Based on this background, the article first introduces the definition and characteristics of the international digital governance pattern, points out that the digital trade relationship and the comparison of digital power are the key factors to shape the international digital governance pattern, and then focuses on China, the US and the EU for detailed analysis. The results demonstrate that the interaction among China, the US, and the EU in the international digital governance fields and their active construction of "Community of Digital Interests" are shaping the global digital governance pattern in a multi-dimensional scenario.

First page

1386

Last Page

1399

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 庞珣, 何晴倩. 全球价值链中的结构性权力与国际格局演变.中国社会科学, 2021, (9): 26-46.

Pang X, He Q Q. Structural power and the evolution of the international system in global value chains. Social Sciences in China, 2021, (9): 26-46. (in Chinese)

2 乔天宇, 李由君, 赵越, 等. 数字治理格局研判的理论与方法探索. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(10): doi 10.16418/ j.issn.1000-3045.20220729001.

Qiao T Y, Li Y J, Zhao Y, et al. A theoretical and methodological exploration of digital governance patterns. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(10): doi 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220729001. (in Chinese)

3 中国信息通信研究院. 全球数字治理白皮书（ 2021年）. 北京：中国信息通信研究院, 2021.

CAICT. White paper on global digital governance (2021). Beijing: CAICT, 2021. (in Chinese)

4 蔡拓. 全球治理与国家治理：当代中国两大战略考量. 中国社会科学, 2016, (6): 5-14.

Cai T. Global governance and national governance: Two strategic considerations in contemporary China. Social Sciences in China, 2016, (6): 5-14. (in Chinese)

5 张茉楠. 全球数字治理：分歧、挑战及中国对策. 开放导报, 2021, (6): 31-37.

Zhang M N. Global digital governance: Differences, challenges and China’s response. Open Guide, 2021, (6): 31-37.(in Chinese)

6 中国信通院. 全球数字治理白皮书（ 2020年）. 北京：中国信通院, 2020.

CAICT. White paper on global digital governance (2020). Beijing: CAICT, 2020. (in Chinese)

7 Robert O K, Joseph S N. Power and interdependence. Survival, 1973, 15, (4): 158-165.

8 Waltz K N. Theory of international politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press, 2010.

9 Rosa H. High-speed society: Social acceleration, power, and modernity. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press, 2010.

10 贾怀勤. 数字贸易的概念、营商环境评估与规则. 国际贸易, 2019, (9): 90-96.

Jia H Q. The concepts, business environment evaluation and rules of digital trade. Intertrade, 2019, (9): 90-96. (in Chinese)

11 刘斌, 甄洋, 李小帆. 规制融合对数字贸易的影响：基于 WIOD数字内容行业的检验. 世界经济, 2021, (7): 3-28.

Liu B, Zhen Y, Li X F. The impact of regulatory integration on digital trade: A test of digital content industry from WIOD. The Journal of World Economy, 2021, 44(7): 3-28. (in Chinese)

12 张茉楠, 周念利. 中美数字贸易博弈及我国对策. 宏观经济管理, 2019, (7): 13-19.

Zhang M N, Zhou N L. China-US digital trade Game and China’s countermeasures. Macroeconomic Management, 2019, (7): 13-19. (in Chinese)

13 方兴东, 杜磊. 中美科技竞争的未来趋势研究——全球科技创新驱动下的产业优势转移、冲突与再平衡. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2019, (24): 46-59.

Fang X D, Du L. Research on the future trend of sino-us science and technology competition—Industrial advantage transfer, conflict and rebalancing due to global scientific and technological innovation. Frontiers, 2019, (24): 46-59. (in Chinese)

14 乔天宇, 张蕴洁, 李铮, 等. 国际数字生态指数的测算与分析. 电子政务, 2022, (3): 17-30.

Qiao T Y, Zhang Y J, Li Z, et al. Measurement and analysis of international digital ecology index. E-Government, 2022, (3): 17-30. (in Chinese)

15 刘典. 全球数字贸易的格局演进、发展趋势与中国应对——基于跨境数据流动规制的视角. 学术论坛, 2021, 44(1): 95-104.

Liu D. Evolution of global digital trade pattern, development trend and China’s response: A perspective of cross-border data flow regulation. Academic Forum, 2021, 44(1): 95-104.(in Chinese)

16 Michael P. The competitive advantage of nations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998.

17 王娟, 张蕴洁, 宋洁, 等. 中美欧数字经济与贸易的比较研究. 西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）， 2022, 42(3): 31- 40.

Wang J, Zhang Y J, Song J, et al. A comparative study of the digital economy and trade between China, the USA and the EU. Journal of Xi’an JiaoTong University (Social Science), 2022, 42(3): 31-40. (in Chinese)

18 刘林青, 闫小斐, 杨理斯, 等. 国际贸易依赖网络的演化及内生机制研究. 中国工业经济, 2021, (2): 98-116.

Liu L Q, Yan X F, Yang L S, et al. Research on the evolution and endogenous mechanism of international trade dependence network. China Industrial Economics, 2021, (2): 98-116. (in Chinese)

19 刘敏, 薛伟贤, 赵璟. 全球数字贸易中的竞争互补关系及其演化——基于社会网络分析方法.国际经贸探索, 2021, 37(10): 54-69.

Liu M, Xue W X, Zhao J. Competitive and complementary relationship in global digital trade and its evolution: Based on social network analysis method. International Economics and Trade Research, 2021, 37(10): 54-69. (in Chinese)

20 John P S. Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Ltd, 2000.

21 Newman M E. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(23): 8577-8582.

22 陈寰琦. 国际数字贸易规则博弈背景下的融合趋向——基于中国、美国和欧盟的视角. 国际商务研究, 2022, 43(3): 85-95.

Chen H Q. Convergence trends in the context of international digital trade rules game: Based on the perspectives of China, the US and the EU. International Business Research, 2022, 43(3): 85-95. (in Chinese)

23 沈玉良. 数字贸易发展转折点：技术与规则之争——全球数字贸易促进指数分析报告（ 2021）. 世界经济研究, 2022, (5): 3-13.

Shen Y L. Digital trade development turning point: The battle of technology and rules. World Economy Studies, 2022, (5): 3-13.(in Chinese)

24 Gagné J F. Global AI talent report 2020. (2021-07-22)[2022- 04-26]. https://jfgagne.ai/global-ai-talent-report-2020.

25 张洁, 秦川乂, 毛海涛. RCEP、全球价值链与异质性消费者贸易利益.经济研究, 2022, 57(3): 49-64.

Zhang J, Qin C Y, Mao H T. RCEP, global value chain and the gains from trade of heterogeneous consumers. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57(3): 49-64. (in Chinese)

26 周念利, 陈寰琦. RTAs框架下美式数字贸易规则的数字贸易效应研究. 世界经济, 2020, 43(10): 28-51.

Zhou N L, Chen H Q. Research on the digital trade effects of American-style digital trade rules under RTAs framework. The Journal of World Economy, 2020, 43(10): 28-51. (in Chinese)

27 Adam H. US Working on Asia-Pacific digital pact and other updates. (2021-07-22)[2022-06-26]. https://iapp.org/news/a/us-working-on-asia-pacific-digital-pact-and-other-updates/.

28 Aguerre C. Digital trade in Latin America: Mapping issues and approaches. Digital policy, Regulation and Governance, 2019, 21(1): 2-18.

29 Gao H. Digital or trade? the contrasting approaches of China and US to digital trade. Journal of International Economic Law, 2018, 21(2): 297-321.

30 张健. 欧美关系走向及其对中欧关系的影响. 现代国际关系, 2020, (12): 15-17.

Zhang J. The trend of EU-US relations and the influence on China-EU relations. Contemporary International Relations, 2020, (12): 15-17. (in Chinese)

Recommended Citation

ZHANG, Yunjie; FENG, Liyuan; LI, Zheng; AI, Qiuyuan; and QIU, Zeqi (2022) "Comparative Study and Suggestions on International Digital Governance Pattern among China, United States and European Union," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 37 : Iss. 10 , Article 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220729003
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol37/iss10/3