•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

digital governance, pattern, digital ecology, regulation system, development model

Document Type

Consultation of Academic Divisions and Suggestion of Academicians: Comparative Study on Digital Governance Pattern among China, United States, and European Union

Abstract

In order to better participate in the international digital development, it is crucial to investigate the internal digital governance pattern of various countries and clarify their internal generation logic on the basis of recognizing the current situation. This work makes a comparative study of the internal digital governance patterns in China, the United States and European Union from the perspective of digital ecology, attempts to clarify their respective digital ecological development models, and analyzes the relationship between the development models and their digital regulation systems. The study found that the United States has formed a development model taking the lead in all aspects and a regulation system centered on encouraging innovation. The diversified development model of EU member countries has affected the EU to form a regulation system centered on market construction. China's development model shows the characteristics of being applicationdriven, and the regulation system takes development and security as the dual core. Based on this, the study puts forward suggestions on how to optimize and adjust China's digital regulation system, as well as transform and upgrade its digital ecological development model.

First page

1376

Last Page

1385

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 王娟, 张一, 黄晶, 等. 中国数字生态指数的测算与分析. 电子政务, 2022, (3): 4-16.

Wang J, Zhang Y, Huang J, et al. Calculation and analysis of digital ecological index in China. E-Government, 2022, (3): 4-16. (in Chinese)

2 乔天宇, 张蕴洁, 李铮, 等. 国际数字生态指数的测算与分析. 电子政务, 2022, (3): 17-30.

Qiao T Y, Zhang Y J, Li Z, et al. Measurement and analysis of international digital ecological index. E-Government, 2022, (3): 17-30. (in Chinese)

3 李由君, 韩卓希, 乔天宇, 等. 数字化转型中的国家治理变化. 西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 42(3): 51- 60.

Li Y J, Han Z X, Qiao T Y, et al. Changes in national governance in digital transformation. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2022, 42(3): 51-60. (in Chinese)

4 王喆, 陈胤默, 张明. 测度全球数字经济发展：基于TIMG 指数的特征事实. 金融评论, 2021, 13(6): 40-56.

Wang Z, Chen Y M, Zhang M. Measuring the development of the global digital economy: Stylized facts based on TIMG index. Chinese Review of Financial Studies, 2021, 13(6): 40- 56. (in Chinese)

5 Bánhidi Z, Dobos I, Nemeslaki A. What the overall Digital Economy and Society Index reveals: A statistical analysis of the DESI EU28 dimensions. Regional Statistics, 2020, 10, (2): 46-62.

6 马述忠, 刘健琦, 贺歌. 数字贸易强国：概念理解、指标构建与潜力研判. 国际商务研究, 2022, 13(1): 1-13.

Ma S Z, Liu J Q, He G. Powerful country in digital trade: Concept understanding, index construction and potential judgment. International Business Research, 2022, 13(1): 1-13. (in Chinese)

7 赵宏瑞, 李树明. 网络空间国际治理：现状、预判、应对. 广西社会科学, 2021, (11): 108-113.

Zhao H R, Li S M. International governance of cyberspace: Present situation, prediction and response. Social Sciences in Guangxi, 2021, (11): 108-113. (in Chinese)

8 余丽, 袁林林. 网络空间中美战略博弈态势、动因及未来走向. 郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2021, 54(6): 27- 33.

Yu L, Yuan L L. The situation, motivation and future trend of Sino-US strategic game in cyberspace. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 54(6): 27-33. (in Chinese)

9 余建川. 欧盟网络安全建设的新近发展及对我国的启示——基于《欧盟数字十年网络安全战略》的分析. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(3): 87-94.

Yu J C. The recent development and enlightenment of EU cyber security construction—Based on the EU’s cybersecurity strategy for the digital decade. Journal of Intelligence, 2022, 41(3): 87-94. (in Chinese)

10 洪延青. 国家安全视野中的数据分类分级保护. 中国法律评论, 2021, (5): 71-78.

Hong Y Q. Data classification and hierarchical protection in the vision of national security. China Law Review, 2021, (5): 71-78. (in Chinese)

11 张凌寒. 个人信息跨境流动制度的三重维度. 中国法律评论, 2021, (5): 37-47.

Zhang L H. Three dimensions of the personal information of cross-border flow of system. China Law Review, 2021, (5): 37-47. (in Chinese)

12 张新宝. 互联网生态“守门人”个人信息保护特别义务设置研究. 比较法研究, 2021, (3): 11-24.

Zhang X B. On imposing obligations on the “gatekeepers” of the ecology of the Internet in the protection of personal information. Journal of Comparative Law, 2021, (3): 11-24. (in Chinese)

13 章燕华, 王力平. 国外政府数字化转型战略研究及启示. 电子政务, 2020, (11): 14-22.

Zhang Y H, Wang L P. Research and enlightenment of foreign government digital transformation strategy. E-Government, 2020, (11): 14-22. (in Chinese)

14 陈玲, 孙君, 李鑫. 评估数字经济：理论视角与框架构建. 电子政务, 2022, (3): 40-53.

Chen L, Sun J, Li X. Evaluating digital economy: Theoretical perspective and framework construction. E-Government, 2022, (3): 40-53. (in Chinese)

15 丁晓东. 从公开到服务：政府数据开放的法理反思与制度完善. 法商研究, 2022, 39(2): 131-145.

Ding X D. From openness to service: Jurisprudential reflection and institutional improvement of open government data. Studies in Law and Business, 2022, 39(2): 131-145. (in Chinese)

16 高富平. 从电子商务法到网络商务法——关于我国电子商务立法定位的思考. 法学, 2014, (10): 138-148.

Gao F P. From E-commerce Law to E-commerce Law— Thoughts on the legislative orientation of E-commerce in China. Law Science,2014, (10): 138-148. (in Chinese)

17 王玫黎, 曾磊. 中国网络安全立法的模式构建——以《网络安全法》为视角. 电子政务, 2017, (9): 128-133.

Wang M L, Zeng L. The model construction of China's network security legislation—From the perspective of the network security law. E-Government, 2017, (9): 128-133. (in Chinese)

18 张凌寒. 网络平台监管的算法问责制构建. 东方法学, 2021, (3): 22-40.

Zhang L H. Algorithm accountability in platfrom regulation. Oriental Law, 2021, (3): 22-40. (in Chinese)

19 胡凌. “非法兴起”：理解中国互联网演进的一个视角. 文化纵横, 2016, (5): 120-125.

Hu L. “Illegal rise”: A perspective to understand the evolution of Internet in China. Beijing Cultural Review, 2016, (5): 120- 125. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS