Construct New Pattern of Evaluating and Training Youngsters’ Creativity

Authors

Dongmei ZHANG, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaFollow
Xiaoming LIU, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Yu LIU, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Yanlong XU, China Science Publishing & Media Group Ltd., Beijing 100717, China 1 Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaFollow

Keywords

educational assessment reform; innovative quality training; adolescents; psychological development; cognitive ability

Document Type

Consultation of Academic Divisions: Development and Innovation of Science Education

Abstract

The core talents who support China's innovative development and participate in international competition, on which the realization of the two centennial goals depends, are currently receiving basic education. Therefore, there is an urgent need to accelerate the innovation quality education for adolescents, and establish a scientific model of innovation quality training for cultivation and selection of talents. Through the analysis of the current situation of innovation quality cultivation and assessment both in China and in the world, this study proposes a new model of innovation quality assessment and training based on the cognitive theory of brain science, combined with the quantitative assessment technology of psychology, aiming to change the traditional evaluation system and promote the innovation quality cultivation of Chinese youth. The quality assessment paradigm and tool set designed and developed according to this model have been tested in practice in the training and assessment of adolescents, and will be explored more deeply in the cultivation of innovative talents in the future. It is suggested that the evaluation and cultivation should be carried out mainly from the psychological personality (innovative personality) and cognitive ability (innovative ability) which are the core of innovative quality.

First page

779

Last Page

786

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 龚怡宏, 周天罡, 韩劲松. 人工智能是否终将超越人类智能——基于机器学习与人脑认知基本原理的探讨. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2016, (7):12-21.

2 汪澜. 美国素质教育研究及启示. 西安:陕西师范大学, 2004.

3 陈殿兵, 杨新晓. 能力评估档案:美国高中学生评价体系的实践创新. 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 44(1):99-104.

4 鲍枫, 王以宁. 英国高校数字媒体人才培养模式研究及其启示. 外国教育研究, 2011, 38(12):44-49.

5 张继德. 教学型高校大学生科技创新素质培养模式的构建. 通化师范学院学报, 2008, 29(7):93-96.

6 田培根, 周媛媛, 左名久. 工科军事院校学员创新素质培养的多维分析与思考. 工业和信息化教育, 2013, (2):1-3.

7 Forthmann B, Jendryczko D, Scharfen J, et al. Creative ideation, broad retrieval ability, and processing speed:A confirmatory study of nested cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 2019, 75:59-72.

8 王惠兰. 创新素质教育的内涵及途径刍议. 山东大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2002, (4):83-86.

9 郭萍. 浅析军队综合性大学青年学员创新素质养成. 学理论, 2010, (14):209-210.

10 蔡曙山, 薛小迪. 人工智能与人类智能——从认知科学五个层级的理论看人机大战. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 53(4):145-154.

11 段瑶瑶. 应用型本科高校创新型人才培养模式研究——借鉴STEM教育理念. 西安:西安理工大学, 2019.

12 林瑞. 论创新型人才之素质特征. 中国人才, 2008, (19):28-29.

13 纪宝成. 注重创新人格的培养. 求是, 2006, (24):35-36.

14 黄华新, 濮方平. 试论创新思维的基本构成与测试方法. 绍兴文理学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2000, 20(3):30-36.

15 何纯莲, 赵冰清, 黄浩. 实施开放性实验教学创新实验教学模式. 药学教育, 2006, 22(1):43-45.

Recommended Citation

ZHANG, Dongmei; LIU, Xiaoming; LIU, Yu; and XU, Yanlong (2021) "Construct New Pattern of Evaluating and Training Youngsters’ Creativity," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 36 : Iss. 7 , Article 8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20210526002
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol36/iss7/8