•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

scientific and technological innovation; talent reserve; early cultivation

Document Type

Consultation of Academic Divisions: Development and Innovation of Science Education

Abstract

It is an important guarantee for China to win the first chance in the future international competition to vigorously cultivate the talent reserve of scientific and technological innovation. This study first proposes that China urgently needs to pay attention to the early training of scientific and technological innovation talents from the international situation, existing policies, and the current educational situation. Then it dynamically examines the training theory and practical experience of scientific and technological innovation talent reserve from an international perspective, and further considers the critical understanding and key issues of early training. Finally, some suggestions are given on the cultivation in order to promote the policy designation and practical innovation in China.

First page

757

Last Page

764

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 National Science Board (US). A National Action Plan for Addressing the Critical Needs of the US Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education System. Washington DC:National Science Foundation, 2007.

2 Marginson S, Tytler R, Freeman B, et al. STEM:Country Comparisons:International Comparisons of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Melbourne:Australian Council of Learned Academies, 2013.

3 林崇德. 创造性人才·创造性教育·创造性学习. 中国教育学刊, 2000, (1):5-8.

4 张春莉, 程黎, 王本陆, 等. 青少年创新素质模型的理论构建. 北京教育学院学报, 2018, 32(3):28-34.

5 张亚坤, 陈龙安, 张兴利, 等. 融合视角下的西方创造力系统观. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5):810-830.

6 甘秋玲, 白新文, 刘坚, 等. 创新素养:21世纪核心素养5C模型之三. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2):57-70.

7 Beghetto R A, Kaufman J C. Toward a broader conception of creativity:A case for "mini-c" creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2007, 1(2):73-79.

8 Ziegler A, Perleth C. Will sisyphos make it in rolling the stone up the hill? A critical review of possibilities for diagnosis and support of the gifted in vocational training on the basis of the munich dynamic giftedness model. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 1997, 44(2):152-163.

9 Heller K A, Perleth C, Lim T K. The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students//Sternberg R J, Davidson J E, eds. Conceptions of Giftedness. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2005:147-170.

10 王晶莹. 发达国家中小学英才教育课程模式探究. 世界教育信息, 2013, 26(17):44-47.

11 衣新发. 创造力理论述评及CPMC的提出和初步验证. 心理研究, 2009, 2(6):7-13.

12 Tiffi K. Holistic perspectives on gifted education for the 21st century//Ambrose D, Sternberg R J. Giftedness and Talent in the 21st Century:Adapting to the Turbulence of Globalization. Rotterdam:Sense Publishers, 2016:101-110..

13 Ziegler A, Phillipson S N. Towards a systemic theory of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 2012, 23(1):3-30.

14 Dacis G A, Rimm S B, Siegle D. Education of the Gifted and Talented. Essex:Pearson Education Limited, 2014.

15 王卓, 王晶莹. 管中窥水:美国STEM教育战略的纵向研究剖析. 教育导刊, 2018, (4):83-90.

16 马修·卡纳迪, 艾瑞克·格林沃尔德, 金伯利·哈里斯, 等. 对 STEM管道比喻理论的质疑——STEM管道比喻理论是否适用于学生和STEM从业人员?. 科学教育与博物馆, 2015, 1(1):20-29.

17 阎琨, 吴菡. 拔尖人才培养的国际趋势及其对我国的启示. 教育研究, 2020, 41(6):78-91.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS