•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

digital innovation; responsible innovation; responsible leadership; social responsibility; responsible digital economy

Document Type

S & T and Society

Abstract

The nature of technological-economic paradigm shift in digital economy determines that it is fundamentally different from traditional economy in terms of thinking principles and operating mechanism. Therefore, it shows the typical double-sided functions. On the one hand, it promotes the high-quality development of economy, activates social innovation, drives the transformation, and brings more welfare to the public. On the other hand, it has a lot of negative effects in the fields of work, innovation, market, and society. This research integrates the concept of responsibility into the digital economy, puts forward the concept and framework of responsible digital economy, and provides a set of solutions to fundamentally deal with the negative effects of digital economy. Responsible digital economy will open a new stage of digital economy development.

First page

823

Last Page

834

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 中国信息通信研究院. 中国数字经济发展白皮书(2020 年). (2020-12-11)[2021-01-10]. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202007/t20200702_285535.htm.

2 杨青峰, 李晓华. 数字经济的技术经济范式结构、制约因素及发展策略. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 48(1):126-136.

3 李长江. 关于数字经济内涵的初步探讨. 电子政务, 2017, (9):84-92.

4 G20.二十国集团数字经济发展与合作倡议. (2016-09-20)[2021-01-30]. http://www.g20chn.org/hywj/dncgwj/201609/t20160920_3474.html.

5 Frolov D P, Lavrentyeva A V. Regulatory policy for digital economy-holistic institutional framework. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 2019, 15(4):33-34.

6 赵西三. 数字经济驱动中国制造转型升级研究. 中州学刊, 2017, (12):36-41.

7 Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research Commentary-The new organizing logic of digital innovation:An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4):724-735.

8 Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A. The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(2):357-370.

9 Benghozi P J, Salvador E. How and where the R&D takes place in creative industries? Digital investment strategies of the book publishing sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2016, 28(5):568-582.

10 杨佩卿. 数字经济的价值、发展重点及政策供给. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 40(2):57-65.

11 Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship:Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2018, 41(6):1029-1055.

12 Jabłoński Marek. Value migration to the sustainable business models of digital economy companies on the capital market. Sustainability, 2018, 10(9):3113.

13 杨青峰. 产用融合——智能技术群驱动的第五制造范式. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(1):32-41.

14 Lusch R F, Nambisan S. Service innovation:A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 2015, 39(1):155-175.

15 Evans D S. Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Review of Network Economics, 2003, 2(3):191-209.

16 Kretschmer T, Leiponen A, Schilling M, et al. Platform Ecosystems as metaorganizations:Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 2020, DOI:10.1002/smj.3250.

17 Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sorensen C, et al. Distributed tuning of boundary resources:The case of Apple's IOS service system. MIS Quarterly, 2015, 39(1):217-243.

18 Boudreau K J, Jeppesen L B. Unpaid crowd complementors:The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(12):1761-1777.

19 中国互联网络信息中心. 第46次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》. (2020-09-29)[2021-01-10]. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202009/t20200929_71257.htm.

20 Goldfarb A, Tucker C. Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 2019, 57(1):3-43.

21 宁朝山. 基于质量、效率、动力三维视角的数字经济对经济高质量发展多维影响研究. 贵州社会科学, 2020, (4):129-135.

22 荆文君, 孙宝文. 数字经济促进经济高质量发展:一个理论分析框架. 经济学家, 2019, (2):66-73.

23 Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Digital infrastructures:The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4):748-759.

24 Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O. Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development:The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 2013, 23(2):173-192.

25 Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas L, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(1):72-95.

26 Yoo Y. The Tables have turned:How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2013, 14(5):227-236.

27 Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Boland R J Jr. Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 2016, 26(1):47-75.

28 Mizintseva M F, Gerbina T V. Knowledge management:A tool for implementing the digital economy. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 2018, 45(1):40-48.

29 Matt C, Hess T, Benlian A. Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2015, 57(5):339-343.

30 Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship:Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8):103773.

31 何帆, 刘红霞. 数字经济视角下实体企业数字化变革的业绩提升效应评估. 改革, 2019, (4):137-148.

32 Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation:An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(1):52-61.

33 Elder-Vass D. Lifeworld and systems in the digital economy. European Journal of Social Theory, 2018, 21(2):227-244.

34 Watanabe C, Naveed K, Tou Y J, et al. Measuring GDP in the digital economy:Increasing dependence on uncaptured GDP. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 137:226-240.

35 杰里米·里夫金. 零边际成本社会:一个物联网、合作共赢新经济时代. 赛迪研究院专家组, 译. 北京:中信出版社, 2017:21-37.

36 Holford W D. The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, 2019, 105:143-154.

37 Shibata S. Gig work and the discourse of autonomy:Fictitious freedom in Japan's digital economy. New Political Economy, 2019, 25(4):535-551.

38 Fourcade M, Kluttz D N. A Maussian bargain:Accumulation by gift in the digital economy. Big Data & Society, 2020, 7(1):1-16.

39 李娜, 陈君. 负责任创新框架下的人工智能伦理问题研究. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(6):258-264.

40 Pazaitis A, Kostakis V, Bauwens M. Digital economy and the rise of open cooperativism:The case of the Enspiral Network. Transfer:European Review of Labour and Research, 2017, 23(2):177-192.

41 熊鸿儒. 我国数字经济发展中的平台垄断及其治理策略.改革, 2019, (7):52-61.

42 Rayna T. Understanding the challenges of the digital economy:The nature of digital goods. Communications & Strategies, 2008, 1(71):13-36.

43 阳镇, 陈劲. 数智化时代下企业社会责任的创新与治理. 上海财经大学学报, 2020, 22(6):33-51.

44 张晓. 数字经济发展的逻辑:一个系统性分析框架. 电子政务, 2018, (6):2-10.

45 李飞翔. " 大数据杀熟" 背后的伦理审思、治理与启示. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(1):7-15.

46 Webb H, Burnap P, Procter R, et al. Digital wildfires:Propagation, verification, regulation, and responsible innovation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2016, 34(3):1-15.

47 van Dijck J, Nieborg D, Poell T. Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review, 2019, 8(2):1-18.

48 高运根. BEPS行动计划1、成果1数字经济面临的税收挑战. 国际税收, 2014, (10):15-17.

49 Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 2013, 42(9):1568-1580.

50 彭坚, 杨红玲. 责任型领导:概念变迁、理论视角及本土启示. 心理科学, 2018, 41(6):1464-1469.

51 Dreyer M, Chefneux L, Goldberg A, et al. Responsible innovation:A complementary view from industry with proposals for bridging different perspectives. Sustainability, 2017, 9(10):1719.

52 Martinuzzi A, Blok V, Brem A, et al. Responsible research and innovation in industry-Challenges, insights and perspectives. Sustainability, 2018, 10(3):702.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS