•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Authors

Qingmin PAN, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Jiamei SUN, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China Engineering Laboratory for Grass-based Livestock Husbandry, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Yuanhe YANG, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Wei LIU, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China Engineering Laboratory for Grass-based Livestock Husbandry, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Ang LI, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Yunfeng PENG, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Jianguo XUE, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Hao XIA, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
Jianhui HUANG, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Keywords

natural grasslands; “small vs. large area” principle; ecological function; production function; intelligent grazing system

Document Type

High-quality Development of Grass-based Livestock Husbandry

Abstract

The area of grassland in China is about 392.8 million hm2, covering 40.9% of land surface of China. Grasslands not only serve as important green barriers for national ecological security but also as basic means of production for local farmers and herders. However, the grasslands in China have been unevenly deteriorating since 1980s in large areas. To date, the overall condition of grasslands in China remains worsening, with some area getting better. Such a situation severely constrains the developments of ecological civilization and social economy in China. Here, we analyze the current state and issues in grassland restoration and conservation and suggest some countermeasures, aiming to restore, conserve, and sustainably use the grasslands in China.

First page

666

Last Page

674

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 国家林业和草原局. 中国草原保护情况. (2018-08-22). http://grassland.china.com.cn/2018-08/22/content_40472470.html.

2 李建东, 方精云. 中国草原的生态功能研究. 北京:科学出版社, 2016.

3 高树琴, 胡兆民, 韩勇, 等. 生态草牧业在我国精准扶贫中的作用和潜力——中国科学院植物研究所科技扶贫实践与模式探索. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(2):223-230.

4 李博. 我国草地资源现况、问题及对策. 中国科学院院刊, 1997, 12(1):49-51.

5 李博. 中国北方草地退化及其防治对策. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(6):1-9.

6 刘加文. 大力开展草原生态修复. 草地学报, 2018, 26(5):1052-1055.

7 白永飞, 潘庆民, 邢旗. 草地生产与生态功能合理配置的理论基础与关键技术. 科学通报, 2016, 61(2):201-212.

8 潘庆民, 薛建国, 陶金, 等. 中国北方草原退化现状与恢复技术. 科学通报, 2018, 63(17):1642-1650.

9 陈仲新, 张新时. 中国生态系统效益的价值. 科学通报, 2000, 45(1):17-23.

10 Connell J H. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs:High diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science, 1978, 199:1302-1310.

11 Briske D D, Fuhlendorf S D, Smeins F E. State-and-transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health:A synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2005, 58:1-10.

12 McNaughton S J. Ecology of a grazing ecosystem:The serengeti. Ecological Monographs, 1985, 55(3):259-294.

13 方精云, 潘庆民, 高树琴, 等. "以小保大"原理:用小面积人工草地建设换取大面积天然草地的保护与修复. 草业科学, 2016, 33(10):1913-1916.

14 方精云, 景海春, 张文浩, 等. 论草牧业的理论体系及其实践. 科学通报, 2018, 63(17):1619-1631.

15 程积民, 井赵斌, 金晶炜, 等. 黄土高原半干旱区退化草地恢复与利用过程研究. 中国科学:生命科学, 2014, 44(3):267-279.

16 Butterfield B J, Copeland S M, Munson S M, et al. Prestoration:Using species in restoration that will persist now and into the future. Restoration Ecology, 2017, 25:S155-S163.

17 曹广民, 龙瑞军. 三江源区"黑土滩"型退化草地自然恢复的瓶颈及解决途径. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1):4-9.

18 尚占环, 董全民, 施建军, 等. 青藏高原"黑土滩"退化草地及其生态恢复近10年研究进展——兼论三江源生态恢复问题. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1):1-21.

19 贺金生, 刘志鹏, 姚拓, 等. 青藏高原退化草地恢复的制约因子及修复技术. 科技导报, 2020, 38(17):66-80.

20 许志信, 郭丽珍. 加强草原建设促进畜牧业发展. 内蒙古草业, 2000, 12(3):1-6.

21 Ellis J E, Swift D M. Stability of African pastoral ecosystems:Alternate paradigms and implications for development. Journal of Range Management, 1988, 41(6):450-459.

22 Scoones I. Exploiting heterogeneity:Habitat use by cattle in dryland Zimbabwe. Journal of Arid Environments, 1995, 29(2):221-237.

23 Vetter S. Rangelands at equilibrium and non-equilibrium:Recent developments in the debate. Journal of Arid Environments, 2005, 62(2):321-341.

24 Briske D D, Coppock D L, Illius A W, et al. Strategies for global rangeland stewardship:Assessment through the lens of the equilibrium-non-equilibrium debate. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 57(6):1056-1067.

25 Gillan J K, McClaran M P, Swetnam T L, et al. Estimating forage utilization with drone-based photogrammetric point clouds. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2019, 72(4):575-585.

26 Karl J W, Yelich J V, Ellison M J, et al. Estimates of willow (Salix spp.) canopy volume using unmanned aerial systems. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2020, 73(4):531-537.

Share

COinS