Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


world power of science and technology, Needham Puzzle, Qian Xuesen's Question, poverty of philosophy, cultivation of philosophy

Document Type

Philosophy and Science


Since the founding of the People's Republic of China more than 70 years ago, China's science and technology development has gained great achievements. However, some deep-rooted problems still pose serious impediments for China to build itself into a world power of science and technology in the next 30 years. It is a must for us to explore the root causes of these problems and find the solution. Through the analysis of the historical context of the "Needham Puzzle" and "Qian Xuesen's Question", as well as the philosophical origin of the bottleneck of China's science and technology development, this study proposed that "poverty of philosophy" is probably the root cause of the problem hindering S&T development in China. This study analyzed the influence of philosophy on science and technology, and further proved that "poverty of philosophy" is one of the root causes for China's inability to establish an independent scientific system, to train distinguished scientists, to accomplish original innovation, and to build a healthy academic ecology. By analogy with famous Mencius statement:"To cure a disease lasting for seven years, one must seek mugwort stored for three years", this study proposed that the cultivation of philosophy is the "mugwort stored for thirty years" to boost China's endeavor for a world power of science and technology. Moreover, we suggested that the government should implement the cultivation of philosophy as one of national strategies. It is necessary to strengthen the construction of philosophy while deepening the reform of science and technology system in a more mature and systematic way, so as to lay a realistic and long-term foundation for China's endeavor for a world power of science and technology.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


1 Mason S F.自然科学史.周煦良,译.上海:上海译文出版社, 1980:1-2.

2 冯友兰.为什么中国没有科学——对中国哲学的历史及其后果的一种解释//三松堂学术文集.北京:北京大学出版社, 1984:23-42.

3 Russell B.中国问题.秦悦,译.上海:学林出版社, 1996.

4 许良英.关于爱因斯坦致斯威策信的翻译问题——兼答何凯文君.自然辩证法通讯, 2005,(5):100.

5 张军.中国近代科学观探析.上海:华东师范大学, 2011.

6 钱穆.中西文化接触之回顾与前瞻//文化与教育.北京:九州出版社, 2014:131.

7 周昌忠.科学的哲学基础.北京:科学出版社, 2013:1.

8 李志超.易道主义——中国古典哲学精华.北京:科学出版社, 2017:108.

9 袁江洋.科学文化与本土文化之融聚.科技日报, 2015-11- 05(06).

10 Rovelli C.物理学需要哲学,哲学需要物理学.朱科夫,译. 科学文化评论, 2019, 16(2):107-119.

11 Kuhn T S.科学革命的结构(第四版).金吾伦,胡新和, 译.北京:北京大学出版社, 2018:75.

12 刘大椿.从中心到边缘:科学、哲学、人文之反思.北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2006:154-161.

13 王春法.科学文化的社会功能.科技导报, 2019, 37(9):6-10.

14 Einstein A. Letter to Robert A. Thornton, 7 December 1944. EA 61-574, In The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1986.

15 钱学敏.钱学森的哲学探索.北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1994,(4):61-68.

16 冯友兰.中国哲学与未来世界哲学.涂又光,译.哲学研究, 1987,(6):39-44.

17 Einstein A.爱因斯坦文集(第1卷).许良英,译.北京:商务印书馆, 1994.

18 张月鸿,陶诚,蒋芳.呼唤哲学:从"哲学的贫困"看我国科技发展的瓶颈.科学与社会, 2020, 10(4):35-44.

19 张志伟.哲学的起源、危机与希望.哲学动态, 2019,(7):5-10.

20 钱穆.病与艾//文化与教育.北京:九州出版社, 2014:161- 164. 21 Neurath O.社会科学基础.杨富斌,译.北京:华夏出版社, 2000. 22 Nietzsche F W. On the Genealogy of Morality. Swensen:Hackett Publishing, 1998:85.