New Understanding on Scientific Research

Authors

Peng DU, Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaFollow
Hua SHEN, Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Feng ZHANG, Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Keywords

scientific research; scientific function; research object; scientific method; research paradigm

Document Type

Organized Basic Research

Abstract

With the continuous deepening of the nested influence of scientific research and economic society, scientific research has received unprecedented attention. At the same time, it faces bottlenecks in its own development. The scientific research itself, the scientific establishment, and the scientific policy are in a state of change. It is necessary to understand the new laws of scientific knowledge production, and re-understand the interactive relationship between science, technology, and engineering to expand the boundaries of scientific research. This article analyzes the reasons for re-understanding scientific research, expounds the new connotation of scientific research from aspects of object, function and method, and puts forward policy recommendations to adapt the scientific changes.

First page

1413

Last Page

1418

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 Horgan J. 科学是否正遭遇瓶颈期?. 许林玉, 编译. 世界科学, 2018, (6):31-33. 2 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. UK Research and Development Roadmap.[2021-12-01]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/896799/UK_Research_and_Development_Roadmap.pdf. 3 Georghiou L, Tataj D, Celio J, et al. Mission-oriented Research and Innovation Policy-A RISE Perspective.[2021-12-01]. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/mission_oriented_r_and_i_policy-a_rise_perspective.pdf. 4 Collison P, Nielsen M. 科研怪象:产出与投入越来越不相称. 蔡立英, 编译. 世界科学, 2019, (3):42-45. 5 Hessels L K, van Lente H. Re-thinking new knowledge production:A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 2008, 37(4):740-760. 6 D. E. 司托克斯. 基础研究与技术创新:巴斯德象限. 北京:科学出版社, 1999. 7 潘教峰, 杜鹏. 夯实科技强国建设的知识基础——从基础研究的概念和特点谈起. 中国科学报, 2021-11-22(01). 8 吴国盛. 自然的发现. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008, 45(2):57-65. 9 Elhacham E, Ben-Uri L, Grozovski J, et al. Global humanmade mass exceeds all living biomass. Nature, 2020, 588:442-444. 10 亚里士多德. 形而上学. 苗力田, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 1993:31. 11 范内瓦·布什, 拉什·D·霍尔特. 科学:无尽的前沿. 崔传刚, 译. 北京:中信出版集团, 2021:51-114. 12 李春成. 技术科学发展回顾、规划理念与政策展望. 创新科技, 2021, 21(7):1-10. 13 谢耘. 被误解的"科学"与"技术". 中国信息界, 2021, (5):18-19. 14 杜鹏. 加强技术科学是实现高水平科技自立自强的关键. 群言, 2021, (8):4-7. 15 Fraser G. 21世纪新物理学. 秦克诚, 主译. 北京:科学出版社, 2013:5. 16 Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K. The Fourth Paradigm:Dataintensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond:Microsoft Research, 2009.

Recommended Citation

DU, Peng; SHEN, Hua; and ZHANG, Feng (2021) "New Understanding on Scientific Research," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 36 : Iss. 12 , Article 4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211120001
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol36/iss12/4