UK Chief Scientific Adviser System; national science advisory system; national science advisory council; science and the highest level of decision-making
It is a common practice in the world to establish a science advisory system at the highest decision-making level of a country to provide advices on national science and technology strategies and policies. The Chief Scientific Adviser System is a network with Government Chief Scientific Adviser as the core and supported by Departmental Chief Scientific Advisers. It can provide timely, effective, and comprehensive policy recommendations for the decision-making of the Prime Minister, the Cabinet, and governmental departments. It is known as the UK model. Its experience can provide valuable reference for China. This work studies the development, the operating environment, position setting and role of the Chief Scientific Adviser System in UK, and summarizes the experience and inspiration of the UK model.
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Golden W T. Worldwide Science and Technology Advice to the Highest Levels of Governments. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1991.
Glynn S, Flanagan K, Keenan M, et al. Science and Governance: Describing and Typifying the Scientific Advice Structure in the Policy Making Process-a Multi-national Study. Sevilla: European Commission, 2001.
Pielke R, Klein R A. Presidential Science Advisors: Perspectives and Reflections on Science, Policy and Politics. Boulder: Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
樊春良.科学咨询与国家最高决策——美国总统科学咨询机制的产生和发展.中国软科学, 2007, (10):59-67.
Doubleday R, Wilsdon J. Science policy:Beyond the great and good. Nature, 2012, 485:301-302.
李思敏, 樊春良.科学咨询在政府最高决策层的制度化——英国政府首席科学顾问制度的形成与发展.自然辩证法通讯, 2020, 42(2):69-78.
James Wilsdon, Kristiann Allen, Katsia Paulavets. Science Advice to Governments: Diverse systems, common challenges.[2014-07-28]. https://www.ingsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Science_Advice_to_Governments_Briefing_Paper_25-August.pdf.
Government Office for Science. Chief scientific advisers and their officials: An introduction.[2017-03-06]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/426307/15-2-chief-scientific-advisers-and-officialsintroduction.pdf.
Cabinet Office. Realising our potential: A strategy for science, engineering and technology.[2016-12-01]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/realising-our-potential-a-strategyfor-science-engineering-and-technology.
King D A, Thomas S M. Taking science out of the box-Foresight recast. Science, 2007, 316(5832):1701-1702.
Government Office for Science. Organisation Chart.[2020-08-21]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/696771/go-science-organogramapril-2018.pdf.
Council for Science and Technology. The spending review: our research base.[2017-03-26]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/225306/cstspending-review-letter-sept-2010.pdf.
Treasury H M. Spending Review 2010 Executive Summary. London: The Stationery Office Limited, 2010.
Anderson R. Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to Be Learned Inquiry Report. London: The Stationery Office, 2002.
Government Office for Science. Innovation: Managing Risk, Not Avoiding It.[2014-11-01]. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/14-1190b-innovation-managingrisk-evidence.pdf.
May R. The Use of Scientific Advice in Policy Making. London: Department of Trade and Industry, 1997.
Simin, LI and Chunliang, FAN
"Constructing Science Adviser System at the Highest Level of Government Decision-making—Experience from UK Chief Scientific Adviser System,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 35
, Article 8.
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol35/iss9/8