biosecurity; governance of science & technology; institutional perspective; science and society
In China's national security affairs, there is a close connection between biosecurity related issues and the development of contemporary science and technology. The design of biosecurity governance system also needs to consider science and technology as a complex variable. This study takes the governance of science and technology around biosecurity issues as a new subject to be focused on in the construction of a national biosecurity governance system. By reviewing the current research on biosecurity issues, the institutional conditions that could promote the integration level of biosecurity governance system and the governance system of science and technology are discussed. Meanwhile, the policy initiatives that could further incorporate scientific research into the biosecurity governance system and the entire national governance system are also explored.
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Gaudioso J, Astuto G L, Salerno R M. Biosecurity:Progress and challenges. Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation, 2009, 14(3):141-147.
Moritz R L, Berger K M, Owen B R, et al. Promoting biosecurity by professionalizing biosecurity. Science, 2020, 367:856-858.
National Research Council. Dual Use Research of Concern in the Life Sciences:Current Issues and Controversies. Washington DC:The National Academies Press, 2017:10.
Evans S W, Beal J, Berger K, et al. Embrace experimentation in biosecurity governance. Science, 2020, 368:138-140.
National Research Council. Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences, National Research Council, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2006: 4.
白春礼.为全面提高国家生物安全治理能力提供有力科技支撑.旗帜, 2020, (4):13-15.
王小理, 吴沛新.推进国家生物安全能力建设从何入手.学习时报, 2020-07-01(06).
周琪, 李伟.生物安全治理能力的提升, 亟待强大科技支撑和安全意识保障.科技发展与治理决策参考, 2020, (16):1-7.
Scott W R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2014: 181.
Mahoney J, Thelen K. Explaining Institutional Change:Ambiguity, Agency and Power. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2009:4.
Meyer J W, Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations:Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83(2):340-363.
Di Maggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited:Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2):147-160.
方新.中国科技体制改革--三十年的变与不变.科学学研究, 2012, 30(10):1441-1443.
杜鹏, 王孜丹, 曹芹.世界科学发展的若干趋势及启示.中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(5):555-563.
杜鹏.关于科学的社会责任.科学与社会, 2011, (1):114-122.
Chao, ZHAO; Zhigang, HU; Jian, JIAO; Hui, LIN; and Peng, DU
"Fusing Boundary Between Biosecurity Governance and Science & Technology Governance―Institutional Logic and Reflection of China's Biosecurity Governance System Construction,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 35
, Article 5.
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol35/iss9/5