Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)
Keywords
double evaluation; resource and environmental carrying capacity; territorial development suitability; spatial planning; spatial development pattern optimization; MFOZ
Document Type
Article
Abstract
"Double evaluation", the abbreviation of the evaluation of resource and environmental carrying capacity and territorial development suitability, is the important basis and prerequisite for the implementation of spatial planning. This study systematically expounded the scientific concept, study framework, and research process of "double evaluation", and discussed the core role in promoting the high-quality development of spatial development. This article firstly depicts the main development of "double evaluation" in MFOZ researches, including the proposal and improvement of the theoretical concept, the establishment of evaluation framework, and the application in MFOZ planning. Then, we analyze the main function of "double evaluation" and its irreplaceable fundamental role in optimizing spatial development pattern. As an effective means of cognizing land surface, "double evaluation" could provide the comprehensive and scientific understanding of regional background conditions as well as recognizing the prominent problems and major contradictions in spatial development. Based on it, the "double evaluation" would support basic materials for spatial planning compilation and guiding spatial planning implications by coupling various types of planning in different levels and supervising the implementation of planning. The limitations and proposals of the "double evaluation" are discussed to proper use it in actual work, which emphasizes that the adjustment of technical methods with local conditions and other basic work should also be taken into account. Meanwhile, we discussed the main features and problems of "Guidelines for the Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity and Territorial Development Suitability (Trial)", which was recently released by the Ministry of Natural Resources. Lastly, suggestions are made on the direction of improving and deepening the method and application of "double evaluation" in the optimization of spatial development pattern.
First page
814
Last Page
824
Language
Chinese
Publisher
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
References
胡锦涛.坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进为全面建成小康社会而奋斗.人民日报, 2012-11-18(01).
陆大道. "未来地球"框架文件与中国地理科学的发展——从"未来地球"框架文件看黄秉维先生论断的前瞻性.地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1043-1051.
徐冠华, 葛全胜, 宫鹏, 等.全球变化和人类可持续发展:挑战与对策.科学通报, 2013, 58(21):2100-2106.
樊杰.我国空间治理体系现代化在"十九大"后的新态势.中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(4):396-404.
张高丽.大力推进生态文明努力建设美丽中国.求是, 2013, (24):3-11.
Fan J, Wang Y, Wang C, et al. Reshaping the sustainable geographical pattern:A major function zoning model and its applications in China. Earth's Future, 2019, 7(1):25-42.
新华网.习近平: 在深入推动长江经济带发展座谈会上的讲话.[2019-8-31]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2019-08/31/c_1124945382.htm.
樊杰.地域功能-结构的空间组织途径——对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论.地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2373-2387.
王亚飞, 樊杰, 周侃.基于"双评价"集成的国土空间地域功能优化分区.地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2415-2429.
樊杰.中国人文地理学70年创新发展与学术特色.中国科学:地球科学, 2019, 49(11):1697-1719.
Fan J. How Chinese Human Geographers Influence Decision Makers & Society. Beijing:China Commerce and Trade Press, 2016.
樊杰, 周侃, 陈东.生态文明建设中优化国土空间开发格局的经济地理学研究创新与应用实践.经济地理, 2013, 33(1):1-8.
樊杰.中国主体功能区划方案.地理学报, 2015, 70(2):186-201.
盛科荣, 樊杰.地域功能的生成机理:基于人地关系地域系统理论的解析.经济地理, 2018, 38(5):11-19.
樊杰.人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索.地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1060-1068.
樊杰.资源环境承载能力和国土空间开发适宜性评价方法指南.北京:科学出版社, 2019.
樊杰, 王亚飞, 汤青, 等.全国资源环境承载能力监测预警(2014版)学术思路与总体技术流程.地理科学, 2015, 35(1):1-10.
樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础.地理学报, 2007, 62(4):339-350.
盛科荣, 樊杰.主体功能区作为国土开发的基础制度作用.中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(1):44-50.
周侃, 樊杰, 盛科荣.国土空间管控的方法与途径.地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2527-2540.
郑华, 欧阳志云.生态红线的实践与思考.中国科学院院刊, 2014, 29(4):457-461.
高晓路, 吴丹贤, 周侃, 等.国土空间规划中城镇空间和城镇开发边界的划定.地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2458-2472.
张雪飞, 王传胜, 李萌.国土空间规划中生态空间和生态保护红线的划定.地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2430-2446.
李军, 胡云锋, 任旺兵, 等.国家主体功能区空间型监测评价指标体系.地理研究, 2013, 32(1):123-132.
樊杰, 周侃, 王亚飞.全国资源环境承载能力预警(2016版)的基点和技术方法进展.地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3):266-276.
国家发展和改革委员会.全国及各地区主体功能区规划.北京:人民出版社, 2015.
徐勇, 张雪飞, 李丽娟, 等.我国资源环境承载约束地域分异及类型划分.中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(1):34-43.
欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究.生态学报, 2000, 28(1):10-13.
郑度, 欧阳, 周成虎.对自然地理区划方法的认识与思考.地理学报, 2008, 63(6):563-573.
樊杰.地理学的综合性与区域发展的集成研究.地理学报, 2004, 59(S1):33-40.
新华社评论员.让黄河成为造福人民的幸福河.[2019-09-19]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/2019-09/19/c_1125016794.htm.
欧阳志云, 徐卫华, 肖燚, 等.新世纪我国生态安全面临的新态势与对策.智库理论与实践, 2016, 1(6):33-41.
郭锐, 陈东, 樊杰.国土空间规划体系与不同层级规划间的衔接.地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2518-2526.
Fan J, Wang Y, Ouyang Z, et al. Risk forewarning of regional development sustainability based on a natural resources and environmental carrying index in China. Earth's Future, 2017, 5(2):196-213.
Recommended Citation
Daojing, ZHOU; Yong, XU; Yafei, WANG; Kan, ZHOU; Baoyin, LIU; Jiuyi, LI; and Jie, FAN
(2020)
"Methodology and Role of "Double Evaluation" in Optimization of Spatial Development Pattern,"
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 35
:
Iss.
7
, Article 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20200421001
Available at:
https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol35/iss7/3
Click link below to download English version.
Methodology and Role of Double Evaluation in Optimization of Spatial Development Pattern 2010CG00054.pdf (2059 kB)