•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

relative poverty areas; sustainable livelihoods; high-quality development; comprehensive benefits; regional coordination

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Poverty is a major challenge faced by human development, especially the global problem that has plagued developing countries, including China, for a long time. As rural absolute poverty population and poverty-stricken counties will achieve poverty alleviation in 2020, China's anti-poverty focus in the new era will begin to shift from targeted poverty alleviation in absolute poverty areas to high-quality development through comprehensive measures in relative poverty areas. Based on an initially constructed conceptual model of high-quality development in relative poverty areas, this article analyzed the internal and external constraints from the sustainability of individual and regional scales, and further proposed comprehensive policies to ensure that poverty would not be returned after 2020 and high-quality development would be achieved. It is necessary to guide the rational flow of population and development factors, reshape the appearance of urban and rural interaction and equivalent development, further promote the value of resources and ecological advantages, and focus on key poverty areas such as the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Taking the "14th Five-Year Plan" period as the transition period, formulate flexible and accurate identification standards for relative poverty population and areas, focus on the integration of various poverty alleviation policy tools and resources, and form a centralized, distributed, and mobile highquality infrastructure and public service guarantee system.

First page

895

Last Page

906

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

何秀荣.改革40年的农村反贫困认识与后脱贫战略前瞻.农村经济, 2018, (11):1-8.

汪三贵, 曾小溪.从区域扶贫开发到精准扶贫--改革开放40年中国扶贫政策的演进及脱贫攻坚的难点和对策.农业经济问题, 2018, 39(8):40-50.

李培林, 魏后凯, 黄承伟, 等.中国扶贫开发报告(2016).北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2016.

马文武, 杜辉.贫困瞄准机制演化视角的中国农村反贫困实践:1978~2018.当代经济研究, 2019, (5):32-42.

孙久文, 夏添.中国扶贫战略与2020年后相对贫困线划定--基于理论、政策和数据的分析.中国农村经济, 2019, (10):98-113.

杨骅骝, 周绍杰, 胡鞍钢.中国式扶贫:实践、成就、经验与展望.国家行政学院学报, 2018, (6):140-144.

樊杰, 王亚飞, 梁博.中国区域发展格局演变过程与调控.地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2437-2454.

樊杰.中国主体功能区划方案.地理学报, 2015, 70(2):186-201.

高培勇.理解、把握和推动经济高质量发展.经济学动态, 2019, (8):3-9.

樊杰, 王亚飞. 40年来中国经济地理格局变化及新时代区域协调发展.经济地理, 2019, 39(1):1-7.

汤青.可持续生计的研究现状及未来重点趋向.地球科学进展, 2015, 30(7):823-833

Roberts M G, 杨国安.可持续发展研究方法国际进展--脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较.地理科学进展, 2003, 22(1):11-21.

樊杰.地域功能-结构的空间组织途径--对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论.地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2373-2387.

徐勇, 张雪飞, 李丽娟, 等.我国资源环境承载约束地域分异及类型划分.中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(1):40-49.

周侃, 王传胜.中国贫困地区时空格局与差别化脱贫政策研究.中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(1):107-117.

周侃, 樊杰.中国欠发达地区资源环境承载力特征与影响因素--以宁夏西海固地区和云南怒江州为例.地理研究, 2016, 34(1):39-52.

赵雪雁.农户对气候变化的感知与适应研究综述.应用生态学报, 2014, 25(8):1-9.

Rodima T D, Olwig M F, Chhetri N. Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation:An institutional approach to climate change. Applied Geography, 2012, 33(1):107-118.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Urbanization Prospects:The 2018 Revision. New York:United Nations, 2019.

United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2019. New York:United Nations, 2019.

Share

COinS