•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

fiscal performance evaluation; comprehensive scoring method (CSM); thoughts

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Having practiced for more than 20 years, China has basically established the framework of fiscal performance evaluation system and method. As one of the majorly applied fiscal performance evaluation methods in China, Comprehensive Scoring Method (CSM) has played a critical role in the rapid promotion of performance evaluation practice due to its standardization, transparency, and operability. However, CSM is also challenged by certain problems, such as multi-dimensional hybrid evaluation, progress-focused evaluation, and poor reflection of the actual performance, and even it faced with severer challenges for its application in science and technology field. Based on the aforementioned problems, this study aims to systemically analyze the issues and disputes of CSM, and to bring up new options and ideas in the CSM reform based on the new demands of state full promotion of budget performance evaluation in the new era and related international practices.

First page

1439

Last Page

1447

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

王云峰.统计学原理——理论与方法.上海:复旦大学出版社, 2013.

财政部预算评审中心.中国财政支出政策绩效评价体系研究.北京: 经济科学出版社, 2017.

湖北省财政科学研究所课题组.建立财政支农支出绩效评价体系研究.经济研究参考, 2008, (38): 47-60.

White J. Playing the wrong PART:The program assessment rating tool and the functions of the president's budget. Public Administration Review, 2012, 72(1):112-121.

施青军.政府绩效评价概念、方法与结果运用.北京:北京大学出版社, 2016.

徐芳, 龚旭, 李晓轩.科研评价改革与发展40年——以基金委同行评议和中科院研究所综合评价为例.科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(12):17-27.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS