Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


break the "Siwei"; Chinese Academy of Sciences; research institute evaluation; CAS mode; science evaluation

Document Type



In 2018, the state issued breaking the "Siwei" related document, while "Siwei" means only papers, only titles, only education back ground, and only awards, and five ministries and institutions, i.e., Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Chinese Academy of Engineering, collaboratedly started the special action of breaking "Siwei". Most researchers in universities and research institutions have both expectations and concerns. There are different opinions on how to break the "Siwei" into a hot topic. Based on the introduction and analysis of the development and evolution of more than 20-year research institute evaluation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), this study holds that the research institute evaluation of CAS has gone out a road of breaking the "Siwei" and formed the CAS mode, thus providing a way of thinking for how to break the "Siwei" from the perspective of practical cases.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


马强, 陈建新.同行评议方法在科学基金项目管理绩效评估中的应用.科技管理研究, 2001, 21(4):37-41.

中国科学院科技评价研究组.关于我院科技评价工作的若干思考.中国科学院院刊, 2007, 22(2):104-114.

徐芳, 龚旭, 李晓轩.科研评价改革与发展40年——以基金委同行评议和中科院研究所综合评价为例.科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(12):17-27.

白春礼.以重大成果产出为导向改革科技评价.中国科学院院刊, 2012, 27(4):407-410.

Xu F, Li X X. The changing role of metrics in research institute evaluations undertaken by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Palgrave Communications, 2016, 2: 16078.

徐芳, 李晓轩, 李超平, 等.关于"三评"改革效果的调查分析.科学与社会, 2019, 9(3):22-33.

Cheng J P, Li X X, Xu F. Science-evaluation reform on the road in China. National Science Review, 2018, 5(5):605.

徐芳, 李晓轩.跨越科技评价的"马拉河".中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(8):879-886.