Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


scientific poverty alleviation; rocky desertification; ecosystem services enhancement; realization pathways; karst

Document Type



On the basis of eliminating absolute poverty and resolving overall regional poverty, it is urgent to consolidate the achievement of poverty alleviation and promote the effective connection of comprehensive poverty alleviation and the strategy of rural vitalization after targeted poverty alleviation. Taking the ecological governance and scientific poverty alleviation in southwest karst region as an example, we firstly systematically reviewed the rocky desertification treatment and its effectiveness and benefits. Then we revealed the scientific poverty alleviation systems proposed by Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) with the combination and integration of ecological governance and poverty relief and regional development. These effective poverty alleviation methods include environmental migration, poor population relocation, ecological derivative industry cultivation, and ecosystem services enhancement. We also analyzed and discussed of the principal problems of current practices of ecological governance and poverty alleviation. To realize the integration of scientific poverty alleviation and ecosystem services enhancement, we suggest to explore available realization pathways, that is, we should pay more attention to coordinate the integrated regional governance and systematic restoration at regional scale, propose forest landscape restoration, develop sustainable ecological derivative industry, balance ecological restoration and local community development, and establish policies for the regionalization of important ecological function areas. The proposed realization pathways could promote the hematopoietic function of regional development and will also enhance the effectiveness and benefits of poverty alleviation and the implementation of the strategy of rural vitalization.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


王克林, 岳跃民, 陈洪松, 等.喀斯特石漠化综合治理及其区域恢复效应.生态学报, 2019, 39(20):7432-7440.

曾馥平, 张浩, 段瑞.重大需求促创新协同发展解贫困——广西壮族自治区环江县扶贫工作的实践与思考.中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(3):351-356.

何霄嘉, 王磊, 柯兵, 等.中国喀斯特生态保护与修复研究进展.生态学报, 2019, 39(18):6577-6585.

韩永滨, 王竑晟, 段瑞, 等.中国科学院科技扶贫创新举措及成效.中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(10):1176-1185.

袁道先, 蒋勇军, 沈立成.现代岩溶学.北京:科学出版社, 2016.

国家林业和草原局.中国·岩溶地区石漠化状况公报.[2018-12-14]. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/138/20181214/161609114737455.html.

曹建华, 邓艳, 杨慧, 等.喀斯特断陷盆地石漠化演变及治理技术与示范.生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7103-7108.

蒋勇军, 刘秀明, 何师意, 等.喀斯特槽谷区土地石漠化与综合治理技术研发.生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7092-7097.

蒋忠诚, 罗为群, 邓艳, 等.岩溶峰丛洼地水土漏失及防治研究.地球学报, 2014, 35(5):535-542.

王克林, 岳跃民, 马祖陆, 等.喀斯特峰丛洼地石漠化治理与生态服务提升技术研究.生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7098-7102.

熊康宁, 朱大运, 彭韬, 等.喀斯特高原石漠化综合治理生态产业技术与示范研究.生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7109-7113.

Tong X W, Brandt M, Yue Y M, et al. Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1(1):44-50.

Tong X W, Brandt M, Yue Y M, et al. Forest management in Southern China generates short term extensive carbon sequestration. Nature Communications, 2020, 11:129.

Brandt M, Yue Y M, Wigneron J P, et al. Satellite-observed major greening and biomass increase in South China karst during recent decade. Earth's Future, 2018, 6(7):1017-1028.

Macias-Fauria M. Satellite images show China going green. Nature, 2018, 553(7689):411-413.

Chen C, Park T, Wang X H, et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2(2), 122-129.

国务院扶贫办政策法规司, 国务院扶贫办全国扶贫宣传教育中心.脱贫攻坚前沿问题研究.北京:研究出版社, 2018.

Hua F Y, Wang X, Zheng X, et al. Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world's largest reforestation programme. Nature Communications, 2016, 7:12717.

Viña A, McConnell W J, Yang H B, et al. Effects of conservation policy on China's forest recovery. Science Advances, 2016, 2(3):e1500965.

Bryan B A, Gao L, Ye Y Q, et al. China's response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature, 2018, 559(7713):193-204.