•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

environmental regulation; resource endowment; path creation; high-quality development

Document Type

Article

Abstract

More than half of the cities in the Yellow River Basin are resource-based cities. The coordinated development of such cities in ecology and industry is of great significance to promote high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. This study takes environmental regulation and industrial enterprise data as samples, uses panel threshold model, entropy method, and other methods to classify resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin based on resource endowment differentiation, analyzes resource endowment, environmental regulation, and industrial pathways to create multi-element interaction, the role relationship, scientific summary of the impact of environmental regulations on the creation of industrial pathways under high-, middle-, and low-level resource endowments, and then put forward high-quality development recommendations for resource-based cities under different levels of resource endowment. The results show that the level of urban environmental regulation in the Yellow River Basin increased significantly from 2003 to 2016, and the gap between regions continued to shrink, generally showing a gradual increase in the upstream, middle, and lower reaches. The resource-based (non-resource) industry in the resource-based cities of the Yellow River Basin from 2003 to 2013, the level of path creation has improved significantly but the regional differences are significant. Under different resource endowment conditions, the impact of environmental regulations on the path creation of resource industries and non-resource industry is significantly different. Therefore, the formulation and selection of environmental policies must consider the local resource endowment conditions and the degree of dependence of economic development on the resource industry, scientifically design the environmental regulatory policy system, and give full play to the role of environmental regulation in promoting ecological protection and industrial transformation of resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin.

First page

73

Last Page

85

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

习近平.在黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会上的讲话.求是, 2019, (20):1-5.

张文忠, 余建辉, 王岱, 等.中国资源型城市可持续发展研究.北京:科学出版社, 2014.

金凤君.黄河流域生态保护与高质量发展的协调推进策略.改革, 2019, (11):33-39.

张文忠, 王岱, 余建辉.资源型城市接续替代产业发展路径与模式研究.中国科学院院刊, 2011, 26(2):134-141.

Wang Z, Liang L, Sun Z, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and the factors influencing urbanization and ecological environment synergistic effects within the Beijing-TianjinHebei urban agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 243:227-239.

柴志贤.利用外资、环境约束与中国工业全要素生产率的增长——基于Malmquist指数与Malmquist-Luenberger指数的比较研究.技术经济, 2013, 32(1):64-70.

钟茂初, 李梦洁, 杜威剑.环境规制能否倒逼产业结构调整——基于中国省际面板数据的实证检验.中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(8):107-115.

Porter M E, Linde C V D. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(4):97-118.

Mohr R D. Technical change, External economies, and the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2002, 43(1):158-168.

王锋正, 郭晓川.环境规制强度对资源型产业绿色技术创新的影响——基于2003-2011年面板数据的实证检验.中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(S1):143-146.

Walker, Reed W. Environmental regulation and labor reallocation:Evidence from the clean air act. American Economic Review, 2011, 101(3):442-447.

Liu M, Shadbegian R, Zhang B. Does environmental regulation affect labor demand in China? Evidence from the textile printing and dyeing industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2017:S0095069617303182.

于峰, 齐建国, 田晓林.经济发展对环境质量影响的实证分析——基于1999-2004年间各省市的面板数据.中国工业经济, 2006, (8):38-46.

郑金铃.分权视角下的环境规制竞争与产业结构调整.当代经济科学, 2016, (1):77-85.

李敏纳, 蔡舒, 覃成林.黄河流域经济空间分异态势分析.经济地理, 2011, (3):29-33.

国务院.全国资源型城市可持续发展规划(2013-2020年).[2013-12-03]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-12/03/content_2540070.htm.

Aiken D V, Färe R, Grosskopf S, et al. Pollution abatement and productivity growth:Evidence from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 44(1):11-28.

李虹, 邹庆.环境规制、资源禀赋与城市产业转型研究——基于资源型城市与非资源型城市的对比分析.经济研究, 2018, 53(11):182-198.

van Beers C, van Den Bergh J. An empirical Multi-Country Analysis of the impact of environmental regulations on foreign trade flows. Kyklos, 1997, 50:29-46.

Liang L, Wang Z, Li J. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 237:117649.

Frenken K, Oort F, Verburg T. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 2007, 41(5):685-697.

苗长虹, 胡志强, 耿凤娟, 等.中国资源型城市经济演化特征与影响因素——路径依赖、脆弱性和路径创造的作用.地理研究, 2018, 37(7):1268-1281.

Hansen B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 93(2):345-368.

连玉君, 程建.不同成长机会下资本结构与经营绩效之关系研究.当代经济科学, 2006, 28(2):97-103.

Sachs J D, Warner A M. The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 2001, 45(4):827-838.

范玉波.环境规制的产业结构效应:历史、逻辑与实证.济南:山东大学, 2016.

余建辉, 张文忠, 王岱, 等.资源枯竭城市转型成效测度研究.资源科学, 2013, 35(9):1812-1820.

刘刚, 沈镭, 刘晓洁, 等.资源富集贫困地区经济发展与生态环境协调互动作用初探——以陕西省榆林市为例.资源科学, 2007, 29(4):18-24.

Wilcoxen J P J. Environmental regulation and U.S. economic growth. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1990, 21(2):314-340.

Gray W B, Shadbegian R J. Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 46(3):384-402.

2010CG00090.pdf (3218 kB)

Click link below to download English version.

2010CG00090.pdf (3218 kB)

Share

COinS