Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


China; US; trade conflict; innovation; intellectual property

Document Type



The main reason of the US-China trade conflict lies in US economic and social structure problems. In fact, China does not have "forced" technology in the related laws and regulations implementation. To strengthen intellectual property protection is also an objective need for China to enhance its indigenous innovation capacity. In order to cope with US-China trade conflict, China should build a legal system and policy system for scientific and technological innovation that supports innovation-driven development, encourage scientific and technological innovation and major output, implement strict intellectual property protection, improve the scientific and technological achievement transformation and the intellectual property rights utilization policies, and actively develop the intellectual property economy, vigorously cultivate composite intellectual property talents and propose corresponding countermeasures.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


The White House. Presidential Memorandum on the Actions by the United States Related to the Section 301 Investigation.[2018-03-22]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidentialactions/presidential-memorandum-actions-united-statesrelated-section-301-investigation/.

冯俊新.从贸易理论和历史经验看待中美贸易摩擦.中央社会主义学院学报, 2018, (6):140-144.

宋磊.中美贸易争端的本质是生产组织方式之争.中央社会主义学院学报, 2018, (6):135-139.

Zhang D Y, Lei L, Ji Q, et al. Economic policy uncertainty in the US and China and their impact on the global markets. Economic Modelling, 2019, 79:47-56.

冯晓玲, 张雪.中美贸易摩擦背景下的中国知识产权战略.国际贸易, 2019, (1):44-51.

李稻葵.中美新格局.中央社会主义学院学报, 2019, (3):36-40.

Prud'homme D, von Zedtwitz M, Thraen J J, et al. "Forced technology transfer" policies:Workings in China and strategic implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 134:150-168.

Prud'homme D, Zhang T. China's Intellectual Property Regime for Innovation. Cham:Springer Press, 2018.

Morrison W M. China-U.S. Trade Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2008.

Prud'homme D, Von Zedtwitzd M. Managing "forced" technology transfer in emerging markets:The case of China. Journal of International Management, 2019, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00550.x.

Robert Z. Lawrence. Can the trading system survive US-China trade friction?. China & World Economy, 2018, 26(5):62-82.

吕炳斌.从中美贸易摩擦看我国知识产权法治的未来方向.人民论坛·学术前沿, 2018, (17):38-46.

单晓光.中美贸易战中的知识产权问题分析.人民论坛·学术前沿, 2018, (17):18-26.

中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.关于中美经贸摩擦的事实与中方立场.人民日报, 2018-09-25(10).

Wong D, Koty A C. The US-China trade war: A timeline.[2019-07-16]. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/the-uschina-trade-war-a-timeline/.

曹刚.中美知识产权贸易摩擦的主要表现及应对.对外经贸实务, 2018, (10):93-96.

沈国兵.霸权的操作技术特朗普政府"极限施压"策略剖析.人民论坛·学术前沿, 2019, (10):78-86.

岳健勇.中美贸易战: 问题与实质.[2019-07-16]. http://www.dunjiaodu.com/top/2018-11-14/3740.html.

Mullen J. China: Trade talks with the US are back on.[2018-08-16]. https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/15/news/economy/trade-war-china-us/index.html.

马治国.新时代如何更好完善中国知识产权保护体系——基于中美贸易摩擦背景的观察与思考.人民论坛·学术前沿, 2018, (17):6-17.

齐志明, 王珂.美方对华知识产权指责是无的放矢——访中国人民大学法学院教授刘春田.人民日报, 2018-04-03(2).

冯晓青.关于中国知识产权保护体系几个重要问题的思考-以中美贸易摩擦中的知识产权问题为考察对象.人民论坛·学术前沿, 2018, (17):27-37.

沈国兵, 张学建.行业知识产权保护对中国出口竞争力的影响——基于行业增加值市场渗透率的分析.浙江学刊, 2018, (2):151-161.

黄鹏, 汪建新, 孟雪.经济全球化再平衡与中美贸易摩擦.中国工业经济, 2018, (10):156-174.

新华社北京.国家知识产权局: 在知识产权领域, 中国有信心、有能力应对任何挑战.[2018-04-07].. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018-04/07/c_1122646262.htm.

中国信息通信研究院.通信企业5 G标准必要专利声明量最新排名.[2019-01-03]. http://www.sohu.com/a/286455151_505812.

国家知识产权局. 2018中国知识产权保护状况.[2019-07-16]. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/zscqgz/1123516.htm.

国家知识产权局发展规划司. 2018年中国专利调查报告. http://www.iprdaily.cn/article_20784.html.

宋河发, 李振兴.影响制约科技成果转化和知识产权运用的问题分析与对策研究.中国科学院院刊, 2014, 29(5):548-557.