"Input-Output-Policy" Analysis on Basic Research of Scientific and Technological Powers and Its Enlightenment to China

Authors

TIAN Qianfei, Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
ZHANG Zhiqiang, Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
REN Xiaoya, Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
ZHANG Xue, Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Keywords

basic research; scientific and technological power; intensity of investment; scientific output; innovation policies

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Basic research is the theoretical and knowledge source of all science and technology, the basis of applied research and experimental development, and plays an important role in national development and technological progress. This study takes five major scientific and technological powers (the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Japan) as the analysis object, "inputoutput-science and technology policy" as the analysis framework, compares from the intensity of scientific research input, especially the intensity of basic research input long-term time series trend analysis, to scientific research paper published, scientific research field international authoritative awards and the Nobel award, as well as the supportive policies and innovation policies of basic research of the scientific and technological powers. Analysis shows that the scientific and technological powers attach great importance to basic research, and its basic research investment intensity has been more than 10% in a long time. High investment in basic research has laid the foundation for major research outputs. Finally, this study puts forward some enlightenment suggestions for China to strengthen basic research and build a strong scientific and technological power.

First page

1406

Last Page

1420

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

Bush V. Science The Endless Frontier.[2019-03-26]. https://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm.

张志强, 田倩飞, 陈云伟.科技强国主要科技指标体系比较研究.中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(10):1052-1063.

陶诚, 张志强, 陈云伟.关于我国建设基础科学研究强国的若干思考.世界科技研究与发展, 2019, 41(1):1-15.

OECD. Basic Research.[2019-03-27]. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=192.

李菊英.创新型国家建设视角下强化基础研究路径探析.知识经济, 2018, 479(21):16-17.

中国科学技术信息研究所.中国科技论文统计结果-2018中国国际科技论文产出状况.[2019-03-15].

刘云, 安菁, 陈文君, 等.美国基础研究管理体系、经费投入与配置模式及对我国的启示.中国基础科学, 2013, 15(3):42-52.

国家统计局, 科技部, 国家发展和改革委, 等.第二次全国科学研究与试验发展(R&D)资源清查主要数据公报(第一号).[2019-03-25]. http://www.most.gov.cn/tztg/201011/P020101122398029257112.pdf.

耿庆申.自主创新背景下基础研究强度分析——基于典型创新型国家的实证研究.中国科技论坛, 2007, (12):21-25.

国家统计局, 科学技术部, 财政部. 2018年全国科技经费投入统计公报.[2019-08-30]. http://www.gov.cn/shuju/2019-08/30/content_5425835.htm.

吴啸浪.我国科技研发经费投入强度再创新高.[2019-03-27]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-10/10/content_5329105.htm.

贺德方.中国高影响力论文产出状况的国际比较研究.中国软科学, 2011, (9):94-99.

陈其荣.诺贝尔自然科学奖与基础研究.上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 30(6):80-104.

门伟莉, 张志强.机构属性的诺贝尔科学奖获奖规律研究.情报学报, 2019, 38(9):907-920.

邱举良, 方晓东.建设独立自主的国家科技创新体系——法国成为世界科技强国的路径.中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(5):493-501.

周家伦.德国科研体制与科技队伍的建设.德国研究, 2001, 16(1):51-54.

喻明.英国基础研究方面的重大政策调整和优先发展领域.中国基础科学, 2002, (2):53-58.

贺德方, 唐玉立, 周华东.科技创新政策体系构建及实践.科学学研究, 2019, 37(1):3-10.

中国科学技术发展战略研究院课题组, 孙福全.国内外科技治理比较研究.科学发展, 2017, (6):34-44.

刘云, 陶斯宇.基础科学优势为创新发展注入新动力——英国成为世界科技强国之路.中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(5):484-492.

黄群.德国最新科学政策和发展战略重点.科学学研究, 1998, 16(3):67-71.

黄斌.德国建立新的"未来部"——寻求将教育与科学联系起来.世界科技研究与发展, 1995, 17(1):61.

翁锦玉, 李金惠.德国近期科技创新战略举措分析及对广东的启示.特区经济, 2017, (8):42-46.

王绍祺.法国的科技政策及主要科技领域.国际科技交流, 1990, (9):3-8.

周晓芳.法国国家研究与创新战略要点(上).科技政策与发展战略新材料产业, 2010, (11):62-64.

张家治, 毛建儒.我国需要加强基础科学研究.科学学研究, 1991, (3):72-80.

胡智慧, 王溯."科技立国"战略与"诺贝尔奖计划"——日本建设世界科技强国之路.中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(5):520-526.

李宁.发达国家基础研究策略对我国的启示.市场研究, 2018, 470(6):18-19.

邓元慧.日本建立科技强国的轨迹和发展战略.今日科苑, 2018, (2):35-46.

耿殿明, 张兆响, 边士东.美、英、德、韩四国基础研究体系的比较与启示.研究与发展管理, 1998, (5):57-60.

US Domestic Policy Council. American Competitiveness Initiative: Leading the World in Innovation[EB/OL].[2019-03-25]. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/stateoftheunion/2006/aci/aci06-booklet.pdf.

Executive Office of the President, National Economic Council, Office of Science and Technology Policy. a strategy for american innovation: driving towards sustainable growth and quality jobs (2009).[2009-08-05]. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED511653.pdf.

吴波.英国国家科技创新政策的战略规划.世界科技研究与发展, 2009, 31(2):380-384.

陈强, 霍丹.德国创新驱动发展的路径及特征分析.德国研究, 2013, 28(4):86-100.

于慎澄.德国创新驱动战略的发展路径.政策瞭望, 2016, (10):49-50.

朱荪远.德国科技创新法律.[2019-03-01]. http://www.istis.sh.cn/list/list.aspx?id=10603.

黄宁燕, 孙玉明.法国创新历史对我国创新型国家创建的启示.中国软科学, 2009, (3):89-99.

邱丹逸, 袁永.日本科技创新战略与政策分析及其对我国的启示.科技管理研究, 2018, (10):59-66.

刘一鸣, 石海明.范内瓦·布什:奠定美国科技霸权的预言家.军事文摘, 2015, (19):76-79.

冉奥博, 王蒲生.英国皇家学会早期历史及其传统形成.自然辩证法研究, 2018, 34(6):75-79.

谷峻战, 姜桂兴.英国政府科学研究投入、布局与管理.全球科技经济瞭望, 2017, 32(Z1):33-42.

王洪奇.马克斯·普朗克学会的历史、结构及其功能.学会, 1990, (6):39-40.

卞松保, 柳卸林.国家实验室的模式、分类和比较——基于美国、德国和中国的创新发展实践研究.管理学报, 2011, 8(4):567-576.

朱崇开.德国基础科学研究的中坚力量——马普学会.学会, 2010, (3):56-62.

惠仲阳.日本新增2家世界顶级国际研究基地(WPI).[2019-03-25]. http://www.casisd.cn/zkcg/ydkb/kjzcyzxkb/kjzczxkb2019/kjzczxkb201901/201901/t20190111_5228103.html.

邓衢文, 刘敏, 黄敏聪, 等.我国及世界科技强国的基础研究经费投入特点与启示.世界科技研究与发展, 2019, 41(2):137-147.

Recommended Citation

Qianfei, TIAN; Zhiqiang, ZHANG; Xiaoya, REN; and Xue, ZHANG (2019) ""Input-Output-Policy" Analysis on Basic Research of Scientific and Technological Powers and Its Enlightenment to China," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 34 : Iss. 12 , Article 8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.12.010
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol34/iss12/8