Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)


public research institutes; new revolution of science and technology; multiple institutional logic theory; classification model

Document Type



Although public research institutes are very important for the national innovation development, the theoretical and empirical research on the institutions has been neglected for a long time. Today, under the background that the United States, Germany, and other countries rethinking the development orientation and mode of their national laboratories while the Chinese starting the construction of national laboratories, it is particularly urgent to carry out relevant theoretical research. Based on the understanding of the evolution of national scientific research institutions' mission, it is worth of trying to construct the classification model of national scientific research institutions by using institutional logic theory, providing decision-making reference for advancing classified management of national research institutions.

First page


Last Page





Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences


杨庆余.法兰西科学院:欧洲近代科学建制的典范.自然辩证法研究, 2008, 6(24):81-87.

易红郡.现代研究型大学的产生及发展.学位与研究生教育, 2000, (3):70-74.

何正军.国外国立科研机构的发展、作用及启示.中国西部科技, 2004, (12):10-11.

曹效业, 叶小梁, 樊春良.国立科研机构的形成、演化及其在国家创新体系中的作用.科学新闻周刊, 2000, (43):8-10.

Bush V. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1945.

温珂, 苏宏宇, Scott Stern.走进巴斯德象限:中科院的论文发表与专利申请.中国软科学, 2016, (11):32-43.

Donald E. Stokes:Pasteur's Quadrant:Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press, 1997.

温珂, 郭雯, 何宏.变革中发展的德国亥姆霍兹联合会.光明日报, 2017-12-07.

夏清泉.科研机构与高等院校联合培养研究生的机制研究.合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2013. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10358-1014139703.htm

U.S. Department of Energy. Annual report on the State of the DOE national laboratories. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. 2017.

Friedland R, Alford R. Bringing society back//Powell W, Dimaggio P. Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

Thornton P H, Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations:Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 1999, 105(3):801-843.

Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms:A multilevel model. Organization Science, 2001, 22(1):60-80.

Jay J. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(1):137-159.

Besharov M L, Smith W K. Multiple institutional logics in organizations:Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 2014, 39(3):364-381.