•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

world science and technology center; characteristic analysis; transfer pattern; S&T revolution; five-element diamond model

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Since modern times, Italy-England-France-Germany-the United States have become the world scientific and technological centers. Social factors, such as economic development, ideological emancipation, education prosperity, government support, as well as the emergence period of scientific and technological achievements, have led to the formation and replacement of the world science and technology center, the five-element diamond model can be used for effective analysis. The future world science and technology center may not only be one center, but also present the trend of multi-center and accelerate the transfer to the Asia-Pacific region. It has the common characteristics of science and technology center in history, and has the new characteristics of networking, globalization and so on. The world scientific and technological innovation has entered an unprecedented period of intense activity, providing a rare "window of opportunity" for China to establish world science and technology center. The urgent task is to perfect the talent policy, construct a friendly environment for innovation, speed up the establishment of the world education center, and preempting frontier research and subversive technological innovation, realize the Chinese Dream of great rejuvenation and make greater contributions to peaceful development and sustainable prosperity of the world.

First page

10

Last Page

21

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

戴维斯.科学和科学家的一千年.袁江洋, 罗兴波, 译.科学文化评论, 2005, (2): 76-91.

冯烨, 梁立明.世界科学中心转移的时空特征及学科层次析因(上).科学学与科学技术管理, 2000, (5):6-8.

黄欣荣, 王英.技术中心及其活动规律的统计研究.科学学研究, 1990, (2):20-28.

Yuasa M. Center of scientific activity:Its shift from the 16th to the 20th century. Japanese Studies in the History of Science, 1962, 1(1):57-75.

王晓文.世界中心转移研究与我国科学发展状况分析, 天津:天津大学, 2003:8.

刘鹤玲.世界科学活动中心形成的经济-政治-文化前提.自然辩证法研究, 1998, (2):47-50.

R·K·默顿.十七世纪英国的科学、技术与社会.范岱年, 吴忠, 蒋效东, 译.成都: 四川人民出版社, 1986: 77-89.

Jacob M C. Commerce, industry, and the laws of newtonian science. Canadian Journal of History, 2000, (8):275-292.

小威廉·贝拉尼克, 古斯塔夫·拉尼斯.科学技术与经济发展: 几国的历史与比较研究.胡定, 译.北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1988: 43-46.

魏盛礼, 赖丽华.私有财产权法学论纲.南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006, (11):80-81.

周丽华.德国大学与国家的关系.北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2008:75-78.

Gutek G L. Philosophical, Ideological, and Theoretical Perspectives On Education. New Jersey:Pearson, 2014:76, 100.

王小燕, 贺兰英.自然辩证法概论.广州:华南理工大学出版社, 2007:76.

董光璧.五百年来科学技术发展的回顾与展望.自然科学史研究, 1997, (2):113-114.

刘则渊, 王海山.近代世界哲学高潮和科学中心关系的历史考察.科研管理, 1981, (1):7-21.

刘益东.开放式评价与学术市场:彻底解放学者的创造力.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, (1):17-26.

周寄中.美国科技大趋势.北京:科学出版社, 1991:11.

姜国钧.论教育中心转移与科技中心转移的关系.外国教育研究, 1999, (8):1-6.

和震.美国大学自治制度的形成与发展.北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2008:344.

蒋志.科学发现过程的统计理论.自然辩证法研究, 1994, (12):30-37.

潘教峰.中国加速迈向世界创新中心.中国战略新兴产业, 2017, (17):94.

杜德斌, 段德忠.全球科技创新中心的空间分布、发展类型及演化趋势.上海城市规划, 2015, (1):76-81.

潘教峰, 陈光华.加快构建新型创新组织模式.瞭望, 2017, (49):17-19.

上海市人民政府发展研究中心课题组, 肖林, 周国平, 等.上海建设具有全球影响力科技创新中心战略研究.科学发展, 2015, (4):63-81.

潘教峰, 谭宗颖, 朱相丽.国际科技竞争力研究报告.北京:科学出版社, 2010.

潘教峰.科技革命与我国战略选择.时事报告, 2017, (9):20-27.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS